Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T09:37:02.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are Online Simulations for Radiation Emergency Medical Preparedness Less Effective in Teaching Than Face-to-Face Simulations?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2023

Toshiko Tomisawa*
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Shota Hosokawa
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University School of Health Sciences, Department of Radiation Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Hiromi Kudo
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Minoru Osanai
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University School of Health Sciences, Department of Radiation Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Kazuki Ota
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Naoya In
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Ayako Ohgino
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Takakiyo Tsujiguchi
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Education Center for Disaster & Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
Shizuka Takamagi
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Ryoko Tsuchiya
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Maiko Kitajima
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Shingo Terashima
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University School of Health Sciences, Department of Radiation Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Masaru Yamaguchi
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University School of Health Sciences, Department of Radiation Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Ryo Saga
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University School of Health Sciences, Department of Radiation Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Kasumi Mikami
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Mayumi Urushizaka
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Mioko Sakai
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Keiko Aizu
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Yoichiro Hosokawa
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University School of Health Sciences, Department of Radiation Sciences, Hirosaki, Japan
Hiroyuki Hanada
Affiliation:
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Toshiko Tomisawa; Email: tmtott@hirosaki-u.ac.jp

Abstract

Objective:

The study clarified differences in understanding and satisfaction between face-to-face and online training on radiation emergency medical preparedness (REMP) training.

Methods:

The training was held at Hirosaki University between 2018 and 2022, with 46 face-to-face participants and 25 online participants.

Results:

Face-to-face training was significantly more understandable than online for the use of the Geiger counter (P < 0.05), but the educational effect of virtual reality (VR) was not significantly different from the actual practice. For the team exercise of taking care of the victims, online resulted in a significantly higher understanding (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Interactive exercises can be done online with equipment sent to learners, and VR is also as effective. The use of videos was more effective for first-timers to learn the practical process from a bird’s-eye view, especially for team-based medical procedures.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alsoufi, A, Alsuyihili, A, Msherghi, A, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: medical students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242905 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nimavat, N, Singh, S, Fichadiya, N, et al. Online medical education in India—different challenges and probable solutions in the Age of COVID-19. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021;4(12):237-243. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S295728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odintsova, TA, Kopchak, OO, Bachinskaya, NY, et al. Pros and cons of remote medical education in Ukraine in terms of COVID-19 pandemics. Inform Med Unlocked. 2022;32:101051. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2022.101051 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomisawa, T, In, N, Ota, K, et al. Training of medical responders to nuclear disaster: hybrid program in the COVID-19 pandemic. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022;4(17):e147. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.59 Google Scholar
Nup:RI Survey. Imacreat YouTube official account. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://www.youtu.be/zunoVYA2m78 Google Scholar
Wong, LCK, Glauberman, GHR, Katz, AR, et al. Interprofessional disaster simulation during the COVID-19 pandemic: adapting to fully online learning. Clin Simul Nurs. 2022;63:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.11.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed