Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T04:53:20.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diagnostic Assessment of Respiratory and Hemodynamic Changes Related to Prone Position in COVID-19 Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2023

Laura López-Viñas*
Affiliation:
Neurophysiology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Emilia Roy-Vallejo
Affiliation:
Internal Medicine Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Esmeralda Rocío-Martín
Affiliation:
Neurophysiology Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Elena de la Rosa Santiago
Affiliation:
Neurophysiology Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Enrique Zamora García
Affiliation:
Pneumology Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Jose María Galván-Román
Affiliation:
Internal Medicine Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Rybel Wix-Ramos
Affiliation:
Neurophysiology Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Laura López-Viñas, Email: lauralvinas@hotmail.com.

Abstract

Objective:

To study the respiratory patterns and the hemodynamic variations related to postural changes in inpatients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19).

Methods:

This report is a prospective study in a cohort of inpatients admitted with COVID-19. We recruited 10 patients admitted to the hospital with moderate or severe COVID-19 who showed improvement in oxygen saturation with prone positioning. We performed cardiorespiratory polygraphy and hemodynamic evaluations by thoracic electrical bioimpedance.

Results:

We observed a median minimum oxygen saturation of 85.00% (IQR: 7.00) in the supine position versus 91.00% (IQR: 8.00) (P = 0.173) in the prone position. The airflow restriction in the supine position was 2.70% (IQR: 6.55) versus 1.55% (IQR: 2.80) (P = 0.383) in the prone position. A total of 36.4% of patients were classified as having a normo-hemodynamic state in the supine position, whereas 54.5% were classified in this group in the prone position (P = 0.668). A decrease in vascular resistance was observed in the prone position (18.2% of vasoconstriction) compared to the supine position (36.4% of vasoconstriction) (P = 0.871).

Conclusion:

This brief report describes the effects of prone positioning on respiratory and hemodynamic variables in 10 patients with moderate or severe COVID-19.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ha, R, Sn, B. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:30-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433 Google ScholarPubMed
Alayash, AI. The impact of COVID-19 infection on oxygen homeostasis: a molecular perspective. Front Physiol. 2021;12:711976. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.711976 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joho, S, Oda, Y, Hirai, T, Inoue, H. Impact of sleeping position on central sleep apnea/Cheyne–Stokes respiration in patients with heart failure. Sleep Med. 2010;11(2):143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2009.05.014 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koulouras, V, Papathanakos, G, Papathanasiou, A, Nakos, G. Efficacy of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pathophysiology-based review. World J Crit Care Med. 2016;5(2):121. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.121 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pump, B, Talleruphuus, U, Christensen, NJ, et al. Effects of supine, prone, and lateral positions on cardiovascular and renal variables in humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002;283(1):R174-R180. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00619.2001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinical Spectrum. The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes of Health. Accessed August 24, 2022. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/overview/clinical-spectrum/.Google Scholar
Faini, A, Omboni, S, Tifrea, M, et al. Cardiac index assessment: validation of a new non-invasive very low current thoracic bioimpedance device by thermodilution. Blood Press. 2014;23(2):102-108. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2013.817121 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fadl Elmula, FEM, Rebora, P, Talvik, A, et al. A randomized and controlled study of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring as a guide to drug treatment of uncontrolled hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2015;33(12):2534-2545. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000749 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szollosi, I, BAppl, TR, Thompson, B, Naughton, MT. Lateral sleeping position reduces severity of central sleep apnea/Cheyne-Stokes respiration. Sleep. 2006;29(8):1045-1051. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.8.1045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altinay, M, Sayan, I, Turk, HS, et al. Effect of early awake prone positioning application on prognosis in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia: a retrospective observational study. Braz J Anesthesiol Elsevier. 2022;72(2):194-199. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.07.029 Google ScholarPubMed
Ehrmann, S, Li, J, Ibarra-Estrada, M, et al. Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(12):1387-1395. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00356-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gürün Kaya, A, Öz, M, Erol, S, et al. Prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19. Tuberk Ve Toraks. 2020;68(3):331-336. doi: 10.5578/tt.70164 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viveiros, A, Noyce, RS, Gheblawi, M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection downregulates myocardial ACE2 and potentiates cardiac inflammation in humans and hamsters. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. Published online November 11, 2022. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00578.2022 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scialo, F, Daniele, A, Amato, F, et al. ACE2: the major cell entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Lung. 2020;198(6):867-877. doi: 10.1007/s00408-020-00408-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

López-Viñas et al. supplementary material 1
Download undefined(File)
File 742 KB
Supplementary material: File

López-Viñas et al. supplementary material 2
Download undefined(File)
File 17.6 KB