Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T00:19:43.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating Nebraska EMS Providers’ Ability and Willingness to Respond to Emergencies Resulting from Bioterrorist Attacks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

Ryan Houser*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
*
Corresponding author: Ryan Houser, Email: houser.ryanscott@gmail.com.

Abstract

Objective:

Previous studies have found that public health systems within the United States are inadequately prepared for an act of biological terrorism. As the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic continues, few studies have evaluated bioterrorism preparedness of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), even in the accelerating environment of biothreats.

Methods:

This study utilized an Internet-based survey to assess the level of preparedness and willingness to respond to a bioterrorism attack and identify factors that predict preparedness and willingness among Nebraska EMS providers. The survey was available for 1 month in 2021 during which 190 EMS providers responded to the survey.

Results:

Only 56.8% of providers were able to recognize an illness or injury as potentially resulting from exposure to a biological agent. The provider Clinical Competency levels ranged from a low of 13.6% (ability to initiate patient care within his/her professional scope of practice and arrange for prompt referral appropriate to the identified condition(s)) to a high of 74% (the ability to respond to an emergency within the emergency management system of his/her practice, institution, and community). Only 10% of the respondents were both willing and able to effectively function in a bioterror environment.

Conclusion:

To effectively prepare for and respond to a bioterrorist attack, all levels of the health care system need to have the clinical skills, knowledge, and abilities necessary to treat patients exposed to biological agents. Policy changes and increased focus on training and drills are needed to ensure a prepared EMS system, which is crucial to a resilient state. EMS entities need to be aware of the extent of their available workforce so that the country can be prepared for the increasing threat of bioterrorism or other novel emerging infectious disease outbreaks. A resilient nation relies on a prepared set of EMS providers who are willing to respond to biological terrorism events.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Vogel, KM. 9. Biodefense. In: Biosecurity Interventions. Columbia University Press; 2008:227-256. doi: 10.7312/lako14606-009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caves, JP Jr, Carus, WS. The Future of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Their Nature and Role in 2030. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, A, Nelson, C. Who should we fear more: biohackers, disgruntled postdocs, or bad governments? A simple risk chain model of biorisk. Health Secur. 2020;18(3):155-163. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0115 Google ScholarPubMed
Veenema, TG, Walden, B, Feinstein, N, Williams, JP. Factors affecting hospital-based nurses’ willingness to respond to a radiation emergency. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(4):224-229. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31818a2b7a CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiGiovanni, C. The spectrum of human reactions to terrorist attacks with weapons of mass destruction: early management considerations. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18(3):253-257. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X00001138 Google ScholarPubMed
Le, AB, Buehler, SA, Maniscalco, PM, et al. Determining training and education needs pertaining to highly infectious disease preparedness and response: a gap analysis survey of US emergency medical services practitioners. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46(3):246-252. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.09.024 Google ScholarPubMed
Qureshi, K. Health care workers’ ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters. J Urban Health Bull N Y Acad Med. 2005;82(3):378-388. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jti086 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cone, DC, Cummings, BA. Hospital disaster staffing: if you call, will they come? Am J Disaster Med. 2006;1(1):28-36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18274041 Google ScholarPubMed
Chaffee, M. Willingness of health care personnel to work in a disaster: an integrative review of the literature. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(1):42-56. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31818e8934 Google Scholar
Harbison, R, Crane, J, McCluskey, J, Johnson, G. Assessment of community healthcare providers ability and willingness to respond to emergencies resulting from bioterrorist attacks. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(1):13. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.55808 Google Scholar
Crane, J. Assessment of the Community Healthcare Providers’ Ability and Willingness to Respond to a Bioterrorist Attack in Florida [graduate thesis]. Tampa: University of South Florida; 2005.Google Scholar
Total Statewide EMS Providers, Services, Training Agencies and Instructors. Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services. Published 2021. Accessed November 10, 2021. https://dhhs.ne.gov/Pages/EHS-EMS-Licensing.aspx Google Scholar
Lyon, RF. The COVID-19 response has uncovered and increased our vulnerability to biological warfare. Mil Med. 2021;186(7-8):193-196. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab061 Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Houser et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Houser et al. supplementary material(File)
File 47.4 KB