Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T19:33:45.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prehospital Response Time of the Emergency Medical Service during Mass Casualty Incidents and the Effect of Triage: A Retrospective Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2021

Johan L. Heemskerk Open the ORCID record for Johan L. Heemskerk [Opens in a new window] ,
Kingsley O. Abode-Iyamah Open the ORCID record for Kingsley O. Abode-Iyamah [Opens in a new window] ,
Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa Open the ORCID record for Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa [Opens in a new window]  and
Eric S. Weinstein Open the ORCID record for Eric S. Weinstein [Opens in a new window]
Johan L. Heemskerk*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Kingsley O. Abode-Iyamah
Affiliation:
Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA
Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Affiliation:
Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA
Eric S. Weinstein
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
*
Corresponding author: Johan L Heemskerk, Email: J.L.Heemskerk.MD@gmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Prehospital time affects survival in trauma patients. Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) are overwhelming events where medical care exceeds available resources. This study aimed at evaluating the prehospital time during MCIs and investigating the effect of triage.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was performed using Florida’s Event Medical Services Tracking and Reporting System database. All patients involved in MCIs during 2018 were accessed, and prehospital time intervals were evaluated and compared to that of non-MCIs. The effect of MCI triage and field triage (Field Triage Criteria) on prehospital time was evaluated.

Results:

In 2018, it was estimated that 2236 unique MCIs occurred in Florida, with a crude incidence of 10.1-10.9/100000 people. 2180 EMS units arrived at the hospital for patient disposition with a median alarm-to-hospital time of 43.74 minutes, significantly longer than non-MCIs (39.15 min; P < 0.001). MCI triage and field triage were both associated with shorter alarm-to-hospital time (39.37 min and 37.55 min, respectively).

Conclusions:

MCIs resulted in longer prehospital time intervals than non-MCIs. This finding suggests that additional efforts are needed to reduce the prehospital time for MCI patients. MCI triage and field triage were both associated with shorter alarm-to-hospital times. Widespread use may improve prehospital MCI care.

Keywords

emergency medical servicemass casualty incidentsprehospital timeMCI triagefield triage
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 1091 - 1098
Copyright
© Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tomasich, FS, Marttos, A, Collaço, I, Abreu, P, Namias, N, Nasr, A. The Trauma Golden Hour: A Practical Guide. (Eds). New York: Springer; 2020.Google Scholar
Gauss, T, Ageron, FX, Devaud, ML, et al. Association of Prehospital Time to In-Hospital Trauma Mortality in a Physician-Staffed Emergency Medicine System. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(12):1117–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, BN, Rasnake, N, McNutt, K, McKnight, CL, Daley, BJ. Rapid Ground Transport of Trauma Patients: A Moderate Distance From Trauma Center Improves Survival. J Surg Res. 2018;232:318–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruelas, OS, Tschautscher, CF, Lohse, CM, Sztajnkrycer, MD. Analysis of Prehospital Scene Times and Interventions on Mortality Outcomes in a National Cohort of Penetrating and Blunt Trauma Patients. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018;22(6):691–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Ishay, O, Mitaritonno, M, Catena, F, Sartelli, M, Ansaloni, L, Kluger, Y. Mass casualty incidents-time to engage. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11(1):8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peleg, K, Michaelson, M, Shapira, SC, Aharonson-Daniel, L. Principles of emergency management in disasters. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2003;10(2):117–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, K, Aghababian, RV, Gans, L, Lewis, CP. Triage: Techniques and applications in decision making. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28(2):136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, M, Koenig, KL, Schultz, CH. Disaster triage: START, then SAVE--a new method of dynamic triage for victims of a catastrophic earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996;11(2):117–124.Google ScholarPubMed
SALT mass casualty triage: Concept endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, American Trauma Society, National Association of EMS Physicians, National Disaster Life Support Education Consortium, and State and Territorial Injury Prevention Directors Association. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(4):245–246.Google Scholar
Heemskerk, JL, Domingo, RA, Tawk, RG, et al. Time is brain: prehospital emergency medical services response times for suspected stroke and effects of prehospital interventions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.08.050.Google ScholarPubMed
von Elm, E, Altman, DG, Egger, M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies [published correction appears in Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 15;148(2):168]. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573–577.Google Scholar
Florida EMSTARS. Florida’s prehospital EMS tracking and reporting system. http://www.floridaemstars.com/docs/flemstarsdatastandardsvers34.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2021.Google Scholar
Dawson, DE. National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS). Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10(3):314–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasser, SM, Hunt, RC, Faul, M, et al. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011. MMWR: Recommendations and Reports. 2012;61(1):1–20.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau. County Population Totals: 2010-2019. https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-counties-total.html#par_textimage_739801612. Accessed March, 12, 2021.Google Scholar
Schenk, E, Wijetunge, G, Mann, NC, Lerner, EB, Longthorne, A, Dawson, D. Epidemiology of mass casualty incidents in the United States. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;18(3):408–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, HE, Mann, NC, Jacobson, KE, et al. National characteristics of emergency medical services responses in the United States. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013;17(1):8–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frykberg, ER. Triage: Principles and Practice. Scand J Surg. 2005;94(4):272–278.Google ScholarPubMed
MacKenzie, EJ, Rivara, FP, Jurkovich, GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brice, JH, Shofer, FS, Cowden, C, et al. Evaluation of the Implementation of the Trauma Triage and Destination Plan on the Field Triage of Injured Patients in North Carolina. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017;21(5):591–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newgard, CD, Schmicker, RH, Hedges, JR, et al. Emergency medical services intervals and survival in trauma: Assessment of the “golden hour” in a North American prospective cohort. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(3):235–246.e4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, TH, Kaufman, JS. Response time effectiveness: Comparison of response time and survival in an urban emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(4):288–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Heemskerk et al. supplementary material

Heemskerk et al. supplementary material 1

Download Heemskerk et al. supplementary material(File)
File 80.9 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Heemskerk et al. supplementary material

Heemskerk et al. supplementary material 2

Download Heemskerk et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 248.4 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Heemskerk et al. supplementary material

Heemskerk et al. supplementary material 3

Download Heemskerk et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 106.1 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Heemskerk et al. supplementary material

Heemskerk et al. supplementary material 4

Download Heemskerk et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 185 KB