Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T12:51:23.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

9.—On the Ecology and Sedimentation of the Cardium Shellsands and Transgressive Shellbanks of Traigh Mhor, Island of Barra, Outer Hebrides*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

George E. Farrow
George E. Farrow
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Holocene carbonates rest unconformably on Lewisian gneiss in an almost land-locked bay sheltered from Atlantic waves by sand dunes: frosts are rare and cockles, the dominant species, may reach 16 years of age. Five intertidal zones are recognised: algal mat, Arenicola sand, Cardium shell sand, Lanice sand, Ensis sand. Transgressive shellbanks composed solely of cockles and linguoid in form, are advancing over the Arenicola sand towards the shore, earlier seaward positions being indicated by hard-packed areas of shell pavement. Comparison of 1973 positions with those on aerial photographs taken in 1965 demonstrates a maximum transgression of 150 m over the past eight years, but in 1948 banks were smaller and most material was onshore as a chenier.

Different age-groups are dominant in different parts of the beach: young cockles high on the shore; older, partially epifaunal individuals towards low water. In any one age-group shell height is inversely related to distance from LWM. By analysing the age and growth of dead shells from the banks it is possible to estimate where they originated, and thus how much post-mortem transport they have suffered. In the centre of the bay banks receive 90 per cent of their shells from seaward, the maximum distance travelled being 400 m.

During westerly gales adult cockles living high on the shore are blown seawards, though young forms escape by speedier burrowing. This, together with the concentration of oystercatcher predation on small individuals from the more emergent parts of the bay, probably explains why older animals are more abundant on the lower reaches of the shore.

Feeding oystercatchers leave many conjoined valves of Cardium on the sediment surface which roll in easily with the tide and replenish the shellbanks. The valves are rarely damaged, though gulls shatter shells by dropping them onto hard areas of pavement. In calm conditions shoreward flotation of both fragments and single valves is important: banks are high and narrow, and accrete by avalanche co-sets of haphazardly arranged whole valves. In stormy conditions much comminuted shell sand is blown onto the beach from the dunes: banks are more spread out, and the shell fabric locally becomes vertically imbricate in response to directly opposed wave systems generated by refraction around the banks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 69 , Issue 9 , 1974 , pp. 203 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Baggerman, B., 1953. Spatfall and transport of Cardium edule L. Archs Néerl. Zool., 10, 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosellini, A., 1972. Paleoecologia dei Calcari a “Lithiotis” (Giurassico inferiore, Prealpi Venete). Riv. Ital. Paleont. Stratigr., 78, 441–464.Google Scholar
Craig, G. Y., 1967. Size-frequency distributions of living and dead populations of pelecypods from Bimini, Bahamas, B.W.I. J. Geol., 75, 34–45.Google Scholar
Craig, G. Y. and Oertel, G., 1966. Deterministic models of living and fossil populations of animals. Q. Jl Geol. Soc. Lond., 122, 315–355.Google Scholar
Drinnan, R. E., 1957. The winter feeding of the oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus) on the edible cockle (Cardium edule). J. Anim. Ecol., 26, 441–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrow, G. E., 1971. Periodicity structures in the bivalve shell: experiments to establish growth controls in Cerastoderma edule from the Thames Estuary. Palaeontology, 14, 571–588.Google Scholar
Farrow, G. E., 1971 a. Periodicity in shell growth. Spectrum, 88, 6–8.Google Scholar
Fullarton, J. H., 1890. Rep., Fishery Bd Scot., 8, p. 111.Google Scholar
Greensmith, J. T. and Tucker, E. V., 1966. Morphology and evolution of inshore shell ridges and mud-mounds on modern intertidal flats, near Bradwell, Essex. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 77, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greensmith, J. T. and Tucker, E. V., 1968. Imbricate structure in Essex offshore shell banks. Nature, Lond., 220, 1115–1116.Google Scholar
Greensmith, J. T. and Tucker, E. V., 1969. The origin of Holocene shell deposits in the chenier plain facies of Essex (Great Britain). Marine Geol., 7, 403–425.Google Scholar
Imbrie, J., 1956. Biometrical methods in the study of invertebrate fossils. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 108, 211–252.Google Scholar
Kristensen, I., 1957. Differences in density and growth in a cockle population in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Archs Néerl. Zool., 12, 351–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Gall, J. and Larsonnier, C., 1972. Séquences et environnements sédimentaires dans la Baie des Veys (Manche). Revue Géogr. Phys. Géol. Dyn., 14, 189–204.Google Scholar
Mason, J., 1970. Experimental transplanting of cockles Cardium edule Linnaeus. Proc. Symp. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, 3, 824–831.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. and Meischner, D., 1964. Fazies-Analyse im Paläozoikum des Oslo-Gebietes. Geol. Rdsch., 54, 596–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J., 1794. The statistical account of Scotland, 13, 664 pp.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1930. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna. Additional observations on the fauna of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 56, 521–535.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1957. Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). Mem. Geol. Soc. Am., 67, 461–534.Google Scholar
Walton, C. L., 1920. Notes on the shell of Cardium edule. Proc. Trans. L'pool Biol. Soc., 34, 143–146.Google Scholar
Weymouth, F. W. and Thompson, S. H., 1931. The age and growth of the Pacific cockle (Cardium corbis Martyn). Bull. Bur. Fish., Wash., 46, 633–641.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. B., 1967. Palaeoecological studies on shell-beds and associated sediments in the Solway Firth. Scott. J. Geol., 3, 329–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar