Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T06:12:24.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III.—A Petrified Lower Carboniferous Lepidodendron showing Rooting Organs identified with Calamopsis Solms-Laubach*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Albert G. Long
Affiliation:
Berwickshire High School, Duns.

Synopsis

Lepidodendron calamopsoides sp. nov. is described from petrified protostelic stems formerly considered identical with Levicaulis arranensis Beck. The stems range from 2 to 20 mm. diameter and some possess leaf-cushions usually about 10 × 1 mm.

Three specimens are known showing the transition from stem to rooting organs. Secondary xylem has only been seen in the transition region and rooting organs. The latter resemble Calamopsis dubia Solms-Laubach now considered to be part of the closely related Lepidodendron saalfeldense.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Beck, C. B., 1958. “Levicaulis arranensis gen. et sp. nov., a Lycopsid Axis from the Lower Carboniferous of Scotland”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 63, 445457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, M. G., 1934. “Notes on the Kidston Collection of Fossil Plant Slides: No. VI, On the Structure of Two Lepidodendroid Stems from the Carboniferous Flora of Berwickshire”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 58, 118134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggert, D. A., 1961. “The Ontogeny of Carboniferous Arborescent Lycopsida”, Palœontographica, 108B, 4392.Google Scholar
Kidston, R., 1902. “Report on Fossil Plants from the Calciferous Sandstones of the Berwickshire Border”, Summ. Progr. Geol. Surv. Lond., 178, 1901.Google Scholar
Lang, W. H., 1923. “On the Apparently Endogenous Insertion of the Roots of Stigmaria”, Mem. Proc. Manchr. Lit. Phil. Soc., 67, 101106: Pl. 2, fig. 1.Google Scholar
Leclercq, S., 1925. “Introduction a l'Étude anatomique des Végétaux houillers de Belgique: Les Coal balls de la couche Bouxharmont des Charbonnages de Wérister”, Mém. Soc. Géol. Belg., 6, 47.Google Scholar
Leclercq, S., 1928. “Les Végétaux à structure conservée du Houiller Beige. Note II. Sur un Stigmaria à bois primaire centripète des Coal-Balls de la couche Bouxharmont”, Ann. Soc. Géol. Belg., 51, 37.Google Scholar
Leclercq, S., 1930. “A monograph of Stigmaria bacupensis Scott and Lang”, Ann. Bot., 49, 3154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lele, K. M., and Walton, J., 1962. “Fossil Flora of the Drybrook Sandstone in the Forest of Dean, Gloucestershire”, Bull. Brit. Mus., 7, 140.Google Scholar
Nathorst, A. G., 1914. Zur Fossilen Flora der Polarländer. Nachträge zur Paläozoischen Flora Spitzbergens, 44 and Pl. 14, fig. 3. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Scott, D. H., 1920. Studies in Fossil Botany. Part I, 233, fig. 114. 3rd ed. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seward, A. C., 1910. Fossil Plants. Part II, 173, fig. 185B. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Solms-Laubach, H. Grafzu, 1896. “Ueber die seinerzeit von Unger beschriebenen strukturbietenden Pflanzenreste des Unterculm von Saalfeld in Thüringen”, Abh. K. Preuss. Geol. Landesanstalt, 23, 1100.Google Scholar
Weiss, F. E., 1908. “A Stigmaria with Centripetal Wood”, Ann. Bot., 22, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, F. E., 1929. “On the Occurrence of Stigmaria Lohesti Suz. Lecl. in the British Coal Measures”, Mem. Proc. Manchr. Lit. Phil. Soc., 73, 129134.Google Scholar
Weiss, F. E., 1932. “A Re-examination of the Stigmarian Problem”, Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond., 144, 151166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, J., 1935. “Scottish Lower Carboniferous Plants: The fossil hollow trees of Arran and their branches (Lepidophloios wünschianus Carruthers)”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 58, 313337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, W. C., 1887. “A Monograph on the Morphology and Histology of Stigmaria ficoides”, Palœontog. Soc. (Monogr.), Pl. XI, fig. 63.Google Scholar