Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T14:48:13.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IX.—Stamnostoma huttonense gen. et sp. nov.—a Pteridosperm seed and cupule from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Berwickshire*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2017

Albert G. Long*
Affiliation:
Berwickshire High School, Duns

Synopsis

Stamnostoma huttonense is a petrified seed assigned to the Lagenostomales. The open upper part of its integument shows no lobes or chambers. The short wide salpinx is inserted within a relatively wide “micropyle” and is partly invaginated into the top of the lagenostome which usually contains pollen. The female gametophyte is known, it has a domed “tent-pole” and three archegonia.

The paired cupules had sixteen or more terminal segments. Abscission scars indicate that four seeds were borne in each cupule though some were abortive. The cupules if preserved as compressions would resemble the genus Calathiops Göpp.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was assisted in publication by a grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.

References

References to Literature

Arber, E. A. N., and Goode, R. H., 1915. “Some Fossil Plants from the Devonian Rocks of North Devon”, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 18, 9699.Google Scholar
Arnold, C. A., 1939. “ Lagenospermum imparirameum sp. nov., a Seed-bearing Fructification from the Mississippian of Pennsylvania and Virginia”, Bull. Torrey Bot. Cl, 66, 297303.Google Scholar
Arnold, C. A., 1948. “Palæozoic Seeds II”, Bot. Rev., 14, 450472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, W. T., 1941. “On Salpingostoma dasu; a new Carboniferous Seed from East Lothian”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 60, 427.Google Scholar
Göppert, H. R., 1865. Palœontographica, vol. 12, p. 269. Cassel.Google Scholar
Halle, T. G., 1937. “The Position and Arrangement of the Spore-producing Members of the Palæozoic Pteridosperms”, 2me Congr. Ét. Stratigr. Carbonif., I, Heerlen, 1935.Google Scholar
Krick, H. V., 1932. “Structure of Seed-like Fructifications found in Coal Balls from Harrisburg, Illinois”, Bot. Gaz., 93, 151172.Google Scholar
Nathorst, A. G., 1914. Zur Fossilien Flora der Polarlander, vol. 1, pt. 4.Google Scholar
Neely, F. E., 1951. “Small Petrified Seeds from the Pennsylvanian of Illinois”, Bot. Gaz., 113, 165179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, F. W., and Salisbury, E. J., 1911. “On the Structure and Affinities of the Palæozoic Seeds of the Conostoma Group”, Ann. Bot., 25, 150.Google Scholar
Reed, F. D., 1939. “Structure of some Carboniferous Seeds from American Coal Fields”, Bot. Gaz., 100, 769787.Google Scholar
Renault, B., 1885. Cours de Botanique Fossile. 4me an., Paris.Google Scholar
Stopes, M. C., 1914. Mem. Geol. Surv. Can., 41, 74.Google Scholar
Walton, J., 1940. An Introduction to the Study of Fossil Plants, p. 134, London.Google Scholar
Walton, J., 1949. “ Calathospermum scoticum—an Ovuliferous Fructification of Lower Carboniferous Age from Dunbartonshire”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 61, 719728. Google Scholar