Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T21:52:57.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The resemblance between the Lower Carboniferous cupules of Hydrasperma cf. tenuis Long and Sphenopteris bifida Lindley and Hutton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Albert G. Long
Albert G. Long
Affiliation:
Hancock Museum, Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Six new specimens of petrified cupules of Hydrasperma cf. tenuis from Oxroad Bay, East Lothian (Cementstone Group) have been examined. Sections of one show a close similarity in size and shape to compressed cupules of Sphenopteris bifida L. and H. from the Lewis Burn (Scremerston Coal Group or lower Viséan) of Northumberland. The conclusion reached is that cupules of Hydrasperma cf. tenuis Long are petrified equivalents of the compressed cupules of Sphenopteris bifida L. and H. The morphological significance of this identification is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 70 , Issue 5-9 , 1979 , pp. 129 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Day, J. B. W., 1970. Geology of the country around Bewcastle. Mem. Geol. Surv. Gt Br., p. 9. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Eggert, D. A. and Taylor, T. N., 1971. Telangiopsis gen. nov., an Upper Mississippian pollen organ from Arkansas. Bot. Gaz., 132, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A., 1966. The stratigraphy of the North Tyne basin around Kielder and Falstone, Northumberland. Bull. Geol. Surv. Gt Br., 24, IV, 57–104.Google Scholar
Kidston, R., 1887. On the fructification of some ferns from the Carboniferous formation. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 33, 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidston, R., 1903. The fossil plants of the Carboniferous rocks of Canonbie, Dumfriesshire, and of parts of Cumberland and Northumberland. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 40, 741–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidston, R., 1924. Fossil plants of the Carboniferous rocks of Great Britain. Mem. Geol. Surv. Gt Br. (Palaeontology), 2, 454–460.Google Scholar
Lindley, J. and Hutton, W., 1831–1833. Fossil Flora, vol. 1, pl. 53.Google Scholar
Long, A. G., 1960. Stamnostoma huttonense gen. et sp. nov.—a Pteridosperm seed and cupule from the Calciferous sandstone series of Berwickshire. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 64, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1962. Tristichia ovensi gen. et sp. nov., a protostelic Lower Carboniferous Pteridosperm from Berwickshire and East Lothian, with an account of some associated seeds and cupules. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 64, 477–489.Google Scholar
Long, A. G., 1963. Some specimens of Lyginorachis papilio Kidston associated with stems of Pitys. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 65, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1976. Calathopteris heterophylla gen. et sp. nov., a Lower Carboniferous Pteridosperm bearing two kinds of petioles. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 69, 327–336.Google Scholar
Long, A. G., 1977 a. Some Lower Carboniferous Pteridosperm cupules bearing ovules and microsporangia. Trans. Rov. Soc. Edinb., 70, 1–11.Google Scholar
Long, A. G., 1977 b. Lower Carboniferous Pteridosperm cupules and the origin of angiosperms. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 70, 13–35.Google Scholar
Miller, H., 1857. Testimony of the Rocks, p. 466. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Peach, C. W., 1878. On the cercinate vernation, fructification, and varieties of Sphenopteris affinis. Q. Jl Geol. Soc. Lond. 34, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, J., 1926. Contributions to the Knowledge of Lower Carboniferous plants. I and II. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, 215, 201–224.Google Scholar
Walton, J., 1931. Contributions to the Knowledge of Lower Carboniferous plants. III. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, 219, 347–379.Google Scholar