Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T20:01:13.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VII.—The Rotifera of the Scottish Lochs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

James Murray
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A necessary preliminary to the study of the complex problems involved in the biology of lakes is to ascertain the facts. The collection of the bathymetrical data was begun many years ago by Sir John Murray and Mr Pullar, and is nearing completion under the Lake Survey. The next thing is to take a census of the inhabitants. This we are now trying to do by compiling lists of the animals and plants living in the lakes. The study of the problems after the data are collected falls outside the province of a lake survey, and within that of some permanent biological station. This present compilation is one step in the accumulation of the facts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , 1906 , pp. 151 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 153 note * About half the known species of Floscularia were first discovered by Mr Hood in Scottish lochs, and of this genus alone he has found more species in the lochs than there are Rhizota in this list.

page 162 note * A mistaken identification, really an undescribed species.

page 170 note * Recently collected by Prof. Forel in the Lake of Geneva, the first record, to my knowledge, outside of Scotland.

page 172 note * While these notes are in press, P. flaviceps has been found in abundance among moss collected by Prof. Forel in the Lake of Geneva.

page 173 note * Mr Bryce thinks this has never been found on Gammarus anywhere.

page 182 note * Mr Rousselet has little doubt these are Rhizopod shells, into which Rotifers have somehow got; but they are quite different from the only Rhizopod (Euglypha alveolata), of similar form, known to me.