Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T10:19:02.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XVIII.—A Study of the Foliar Endodermis in the Plantaginaceae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

George Trapp
George Trapp
Affiliation:
Botany Department, University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While an endodermis in the leaf is a relatively rare occurrence amongst the Angiosperms, its presence has been noted as being fairly constant in a number of families; but it is only in the case of a few of these families that it has been treated in sufficient detail to indicate its representation generically. Mylius (8), in particular, has examined the foliar endodermis of the Myrtaceæ, the Onagraceæ, and the Rosaceæ; especially the latter family, in which he makes a comprehensive investigation of the genera Spiræa, Alchemilla, Fragaria, Potentilla, Rosa, Agrimonia, and Sanguisorba (Poterium) from this standpoint. An endodermis has also been recorded as present in the leaves of certain Monocotyledonous families of which the Bromeliaceæ, Orchidaceæ, and Gramineæ (tribe Festuceæ) are examples quoted by Haberlandt (4, p. 368 sqq.) from the work of Rimbach, Schwendener, and van Wisselingh.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , 1933 , pp. 523 - 546
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Bond, G., 1930. “The Occurrence of Cell Division in the Endodermis,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. i, pt. 1, pp. 38–50.Google Scholar
(2) Bond, G., 1931. “The Stem Endodermis in the Genus Piper,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvi, pt. 3, pp. 695–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Conn, H. J., 1931. Biological Stains, New York Agric. Exptl. Station, Geneva, N.Y., U.S.A.Google Scholar
(4) Haberlandt, G., 1914. Physiological Plant Anatomy, Eng. tr., London.Google Scholar
(5) Hosbach, O., 1928. “Beiträge zur Frage nach der Durchlässigkeit der Endodermiszellen,” Beitr. z. Biol. d. Pfl., Bd. xvi, Hft. 1, pp. 81–128.Google Scholar
(6) Kroemer, K., 1903. “Wurzelhaut, Hypodermis und Endodermis der Angiospermenwurzel,” Bibl. Bot., Bd. xii, Hft. 59.Google Scholar
(7) Molisch, H., 1913. Mikrochemie der Pflanze, Jena.Google Scholar
(8) Mylius, G. “Das Polyderm. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung über die physiologischen Scheiden Polyderm, Periderm und Endodermis,” Bibl. Bot., Bd. xviii, Hft. 79, p. 41et seq.Google Scholar
(9) Priestley, J. H., 1920. “The Mechanism of Root Pressure,” New Phyt., vol. xix, pp. 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10) Priestley, J. H., 1922. “Further Observations upon the Mechanism of Root Pressure,” New Phyt., vol. xxi, pp. 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11) Priestley, J. H., and Armstead, Dorothy, 1922. “Physiological Studies in Plant Anatomy. II. The Physiological Relation of the Surrounding Tissue to the Xylem and its Contents,” New Phyt., vol. xxi, pp. 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12) Priestley, J. H., and Ewing, J., 1923. “Physiological Studies in Plant Anatomy. VI. Etiolation,” New Phyt., vol. xxii, pp. 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13) Priestley, J. H., and North, Edith E., 1922. “Physiological Studies in Plant Anatomy. III. The Structure of the Endodermis in Relation to its Function,” New Phyt., vol. xxi, pp. 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14) Priestley, J. H., and Tupper-Carey, R. M., 1922. “Physiological Studies in Plant Anatomy. IV. The Water Relations of the Plant Growing Point,” New Phyt., vol. xxi, pp. 210–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15) Quastel, J. H., 1931. “The Action of Dyestuffs on Enzymes. II. Fumarase,” Biochem. Journ., vol. xxv (ci), pp. 898–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16) Quastel, J. H., and Wheatley, A. H. M., 1931. “The Action of Dyestuffs on Enzymes. I. Dyestuffs and Oxidations,” Biochem. Journ., vol. xxv (lxxii), pp. 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17) Rufz de Lavison, J., 1910. “Du Mode de Pénétration de quelques Sels dans la Plante Vivante. Rôle de l'Endoderme,” Rév. Gén. de Bot., vol. xxii, p. 225.Google Scholar
(18) Ruhland, W., 1912. “Studien über die Aufnahme von Kolloiden durch die pflanzliche Plasmahaut,” Jahrb. f. Wiss. Bot., Bd. li, p. 376et seq.Google Scholar
(19) Ruhland, W., 1924. “Vitalfarbung bei Pflanzen,” Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden, Abt. xi, T. 2, p. 187sqq.Google Scholar
(20) Scott, Lorna I., 1928. “The Delimitation of the Absorbing Zone in Roots,” New Phyt., vol. xxvii, pp. 141–174.Google Scholar
(21) Solereder, H., 1908. Systematic Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, vol. i, Eng. tr., Oxford.Google Scholar
(22) Wisselingh, C. van, 1925. “Die Zellmembran,” Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, Abt. i, T. 1.Google Scholar
(23) Zeigenspeck, H., 1921. “Über die Rolle des Caspary'schen Streifens der Endodermis und analoge Bildungen,” Ber. d. Dtsch. Bot. Ges., Bd. xxxix, pp. 302–310.Google Scholar