Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T17:46:23.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXVIII.—On the Distribution of Fossil Fish-remains in the Carboniferous Rocks of the Edinburgh District

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Ramsay H. Traquair
Ramsay H. Traquair
Affiliation:
Keeper of the Natural History Collection in the Museum of Science and Art, Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The district in which the city of Edinburgh is situated was one of the first in Britain from which fish-remains of Carboniferous age were collected. It is now sixty-seven years ago since Agassiz described the fossil fishes which were discovered by Lord Greenock at Wardie. Dr Hibbert at Burdiehouse, and Professor Jameson at Burntisland. The list given from this region in the “Tableau Générale” at the beginning of the Poissons Fossiles comprises twenty-nine names, of which eight were nomina nuda and are not now verifiable, the original specimens being lost; one, Diplodus minutus, was described, but insufficiently, and the original is also lost; six are synonyms of others in the list; leaving fourteen good species, of which one, Ptychacanthus sublævis, is a synonym of a Selachian spine (Tristychius arcuatus), described and figured from the Glasgow district.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , 1905 , pp. 687 - 707
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1905

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 687 note * Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xvii. 1890, pp. 385–400Google Scholar.

page 688 note * Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., vol. xii. 1893, p. 190et seqGoogle Scholar.

page 688 note † Loc. cit., p. 386, 387. Also, Geol. Mag. (3), vol. i. 1884, p. 121Google Scholar.

page 689 note * Trans. Geol. Soc. Edin. vol. iv. p. 34.

page 693 note * “The Geology of Central and Western Fife,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland, 1900, pp. 73, 74.

page 693 note † Trans. Geol. Soc. Edin., vol. iv. 1882, pp. 217, 218Google Scholar.

page 705 note * Proc. Yorks. Geol. and Polytechn. Soc. vol. xiv. pp. 159–174.

page 706 note * Geological Magazine (4), vol. viii., 1901, pp. 216–222Google Scholar. In this paper Mr Wellburn enumerates nineteen forms, of which four—Cladodus mirabilis, Pristodus falcatus, Pœcilodus Jonesii, Urodus elongatus—occur in the Lower Carboniferous marine beds; three—Acanthodes Wardi, Strapsodus sulcatus, Elonichthys Aitkeni—are Upper Carboniferous Estuarine species; one—Acrolepis Hopkinsi—is common to both divisions of the system. Psephodus minutus and Euctenodopsis tennis are described as new, but the remaining nine are not determined specifically.