Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T05:56:39.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Wilkinson & Tepfer's “Fitness and beyond: preparing for the arrival of GM crops with ecologically important novel characters”. Fuzzy reasoning and unacceptable change: defining and assessing an ambiguous endpoint

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2009

Tom Harwood
Tom Harwood*
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK
*
t.harwood@imperial.ac.uk

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

fuzzy reasoningenvironmental risk assessmentgenetically modified cropfitness
Type
Research Article
Information
Environmental Biosafety Research , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 15 - 16
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2009

References

Cox E (1999) The Fuzzy Systems Handbook: a practitioner's guide to building, using and maintaining fuzzy systems, Academic Press Professional, Chappaqua, New York
Harwood, TD (2009) The circular definition of populations and its implication for biological sampling. Mol. Ecol. 18: 765–768 CrossRef
Zadeh, LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control 8: 338–353 CrossRef