Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T05:26:19.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A morphological comparison of Bittner and influenza viruses*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

June D. Almeida
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, St Thomas's Hospital Medical School, London, S.E. 1
A. P. Waterson
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, St Thomas's Hospital Medical School, London, S.E. 1
J. Anne Drewe
Affiliation:
Department of Mycology, Charing Cross Hospital Medical School, Fulham Hospital, London, W. 6
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

By the negative staining technique both Bittner and influenza viruses are pleomorphic and have similar fringed surfaces. The present study revealed that Bittner virus had one characteristic form consisting of a head approximately 1000 Å. in diameter and a tail up to 3000 Å. long. On storage at −20° C. Bittner virus broke down to reveal a round internal component of 750 Å. diameter. Influenza virus did not break down on storage at −20° C. but a small number of spontaneously disrupted particles revealed that the internal component was in the form of a coil. The circular internal component of Bittner virus is presumed to be spherical and corresponds to the previously described type A particles as seen by negative staining. The complete enveloped particle corresponds to the type B particle of thin sectioning. It is suggested that the thinly sectioned mature type B particle may be a degenerate form of the so-called immature type B particle. In addition, it is suggested that certain murine RNA tumour viruses may have a morphology distinctive to them.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

References

REFERENCES

Almeida, J. D. (1963). A classification of virus particles based on morphology. Can. med. Ass. J. 89, 787.Google ScholarPubMed
Almeida, J. D. & Ham, A. W. (1965). The position of oncogenic viruses in a classification of viruses based on particle morphology. Prog. exp. Tumor Res. 6, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apostolov, K. & Flewett, T. H. (1965). Internal structure of influenza virus. Virology 26, 506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernhard, W. (1958). Electron microscopy of tumor cells and tumor viruses. A review. Cancer Res. 18, 491.Google ScholarPubMed
Caspar, D. L. D. & Klug, A. (1962). Physical principles in the construction of regular viruses. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 27, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De-Thé, G. & O'Connor, T. E. (1966). Structure of a murine leukemia virus after disruption with tween-ether and comparison with two myxoviruses. Virology 28, 713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horne, R. W., Waterson, A. P., Wildy, P. & Farnham, A. E. (1960). The structure and composition of the myxoviruses. I. Electron microscope studies of myxovirus particles by negative staining techniques. Virology 11, 79.Google Scholar
Howatson, A. F. (1962). Architecture and development of tumor viruses and their relation to viruses in general. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 21, 947.Google Scholar
Hoyle, L., Horne, R. W. & Waterson, A. P. (1961). The structure and composition of the myxoviruses. II. Components released from the influenza particle by ether. Virology 13, 448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klimenko, S. M., Selivanov, Y. M., Menshikh, L. K. & Glagolev, A. A. (1966). The structure of influenza virus. Vop. Virus. 3, 315.Google Scholar
Lovas, B. & Takatsy, G. (1965). Studies on the fine structure of the influenza virion. Arch. ges. Virusforsch. 17, 67.Google Scholar
Luft, J. H. (1961). Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 9, 409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, M. J. & Moore, D. H. (1962). Purification of the mouse mammary tumour virus. Nature, Lond. 194, 1141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, M. J. & Moore, D. H. (1965). Isolation of mouse mammary tumour virus. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 35, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. H. (1962). The milk agent. In ultrastructure of Tumors induced by Viruses, p. 113. Ed. Dalton, A. J. and Hagenau, F.. New York and London. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, C., Rose, H. M. & Moore, D. H. (1956). Structure and development of viruses observed in the electron microscope. III Influenza virus. J. exp. Med. 104, 171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padgett, F. & Levine, A. S. (1966). Fine structure of the Rauscher leukemia virus as revealed by incubation in snake venom. Virology 30, 623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, D. F. (1963 a). Structure of the Gross leukemia virus. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 30, 569.Google Scholar
Parsons, D. F. (1963 b). Negative staining of thinly spread cells and associated virus. J. Cell Biol. 16, 620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterson, A. P., Hurrell, J. M. W. & Jensen, K. E. (1962). The fine structure of influenza A, B and C viruses. Arch. ges. Virusforsch. 12, 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterson, A. P. & Almeida, J. D. (1966). Taxonomic implications of ‘myxovirus’. Nature, Lond. 210, 1138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed