Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T04:36:00.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The potential role of wild rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus in the epidemiology of paratuberculosis in domestic ruminants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2003

M. J. DANIELS
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
D. HENDERSON
Affiliation:
Veterinary Science Division, Scottish Agricultural College, Cleeve Gardens, Oakbank Road, Perth PH1 1HF
A. GREIG
Affiliation:
Veterinary Science Division, Scottish Agricultural College, Cleeve Gardens, Oakbank Road, Perth PH1 1HF
K. STEVENSON
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, International Research Centre, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuick, Midlothian EH26 0PZ
J. M. SHARP
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, International Research Centre, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuick, Midlothian EH26 0PZ
M. R. HUTCHINGS
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis, the organism responsible for paratuberculosis in cattle and sheep has been found in wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in the east of Scotland. Few studies have investigated either the level of faecal contamination by rabbits on farms, or the potential infectivity of rabbit excreta. The rate of rabbit faecal contamination deposited and the numbers encountered were estimated for 21 fields on 4 farms with a paratuberculosis problem. 7357±2571 S.E.M. rabbit faecal pellets were deposited per hectare per day and up to 81000 pellets/ha (‘standing crop’) were encountered in October/November 1998. Where access to rabbits was restricted, the standing crop of faeces encountered fell to 22000 pellets/ha.

The prevalence of infection with M. a. paratuberculosis was assessed for 83 rabbits from the four farms. M. a. paratuberculosis was isolated from rabbits on all farms with an overall prevalence of 17%. Out of 17 rabbits from which urine was available, M. a. paratuberculosis was isolated from two – the first reported isolation from urine in wild rabbits. The mean number of colony-forming units per gram of infected rabbit faeces was 7·6×105±5·2×105.

A relative estimate of the input of M. a. paratuberculosis onto pasture, at the stocking levels found on the four farms, showed that sheep and cattle potentially contributed 4 and 125 times more organisms/ha per day respectively than rabbits. However, rabbits could still contribute millions of M. a. paratuberculosis organisms per ha per day. Existing rabbit control measures on farms may be inadequate in reducing the risk of transmission to livestock.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press