Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T17:10:29.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Salmonellas on pig farms and in abattoirs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. A. Lee
Affiliation:
Epidemiological Research Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5HT
A. C. Ghosh
Affiliation:
Food Hygiene Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5HT
P. G. Mann
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath
G. H. Tee
Affiliation:
The Public Health Laboratory, Glyde Path Road, Dorchester
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Salmonella infection on two pig farms and its relation to infection in pigs at slaughter was studied. On the first farm feed ingredients were mixed on the farm, and these included fish meal which was found to be contaminated with salmonellas. The feed was pumped to pigs in liquid form. There was a high salmonella isolation rate at slaughter when the contaminated fish meal was fed hi liquid feed, but it was significantly lower when no fish meal was fed to the pigs examined at slaughter. In some instances the same serotypes were found in fish meal and pig excreta on the farm and in caecal contents of the pigs at slaughter. No serotype was repeatedly isolated from any source and it appeared that the serotypes were not able to establish themselves in the pigs. It is concluded that infection found at slaughter originated on the farm where fish meal introduced and maintained infection. There was an opportunity for salmonellas to have multiplied in the liquid feed for several hours each day.

On a second farm environmental conditions were similar, but feed was given in the form of ready-made pellets and nuts. Salmonellas were not isolated from the feed. At slaughter there was a significantly lower isolation rate than on the first farm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

References

REFERENCES

Angelotti, R., Foter, M. J. & Lewis, K. H. (1961). Time-temperature effects on salmonellae and staphylococci in foods. I. Behaviour in refrigerated foods. II. Behaviour at warm holding temperatures. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation's Health 51, 7688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bevan Jones, H., Farkas, G., Ghosh, A. & Hobbs, Betty C. (1964). Salmonella brandenburg: an epidemiological study. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 23, 162–77.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. C. (1972). An epidemiological study of salmonellas in pigs. Journal of Hygiene 70, 151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Thomson, S. (1953). The optimum temperature of incubation for isolation of salmonellae. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 12, 149–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Linton, A. H., Jennett, Nada E. & Heard, T. W. (1970). Multiplication of Salmonella in liquid feed and its influence on the duration of excretion in pigs. Research in Veterinary Science 11, No. 5, September.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, K. W., McClarin, R., Murdock, C. R., MacDonald, W. N. & Hutchinson, H. L. (1959). Salmonellosis in Northern Ireland, with special reference to pigs and salmonella- contaminated pig meal. Journal of Hygiene 57, 92105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
P.H.L.S. Working Group, Skovgaard, N. & Nielson, B. B. (1972). Salmonellas in pigs and animal feeding stuffs in England and Wales and in Denmark. Journal of Hygiene 70, 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. W. (1960). The effect of feeding pigs on food naturally contaminated with salmonellae. Journal of Hygiene 58, 381–9.Google ScholarPubMed