Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T14:08:20.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wire mesh screening for the exclusion of houseflies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. R. Busvine
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Control of houseflies by modern insecticides is becoming unreliable owing to emergence of resistant strains, so that some older measures deserve reconsideration. Exclusion of mosquitoes by gauze has been studied experimentally but not, apparently, of houseflies.

Some simple tests show that a suitable gauze to exclude houseflies (and larger insects) would be 10 mesh 32 s.w.g. with an aperture 2·17 mm. square. This compares with a gauze recommended for excluding mosquitoes, 18 mesh and 32 s.w.g. with an aperture 1·16 mm. square.

The advantages of the wider gauze for flies are admission of more light and air and lower cost. Some simple experiments on the relative air resistance of mosquito ind fly gauze were made by a method involving retardation of a pendulum by a gauze circle. The results suggest that the obstruction to ventilation is roughly proportional to the percentage obstruction (as with light) which was 20 % for the fly gauze and 36 % with the mosquito gauze.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

References

Block, S. S. (1946). Insect tests of wire screening effectiveness. Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 36, 1279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croton, L. M. & Crowden, G. P. (1955). The measurement of the effects of mosquito nets on ventilation and thermal comfort. (A Demonstration.) J. Physiol. 127, 45P.Google Scholar
Davey, T. H. & Gordon, R. M. (1938). The size of aperture necessary in screen cloth intended for the protection of dwellings in West Africa. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 32, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, B. & Pflüger, F. (1941). Bestimmung der Widerstandsbeiwerte bei handelsüblicher Runddrahtsiebe. Luftfarhtforsch. 18, 142.Google Scholar
Lomax, J. (1945). The air permeability of mosquito netting. J. Text. Inst. 36, T60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, A. S. (1933). Dynamics, Part 1, 2nd ed.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
West, L. S. (1951). The Housefly. Ithaca, New York: Comstock Co.Google Scholar