Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Krueger, Joachim I.
Freestone, David
and
MacInnis, Mika L.M.
2013.
Comparisons in research and reasoning: Toward an integrative theory of social induction.
New Ideas in Psychology,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
73.
Räikkä, Juha
2014.
Social Justice in Practice.
Vol. 14,
Issue. ,
p.
61.
Quill, Lawrence
2016.
Technological Conspiracies: Comte, Technology, and Spiritual Despotism.
Critical Review,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
p.
89.
Titlestad, Michael Frank
2016.
Conspiracy, apocalypticism, and contingency in Smith Henderson’sFourth of July Creek.
Safundi,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 4,
p.
447.
Grzesiak-Feldman, Monika
2016.
Psychologia myślenia spiskowego.
Robertson, David G.
2017.
The hidden hand: Why religious studies need to take conspiracy theories seriously.
Religion Compass,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 3-4,
Dentith, Matthew R. X.
and
Orr, Martin
2018.
SECRECY AND CONSPIRACY.
Episteme,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 4,
p.
433.
Wagner-Egger, Pascal
Delouvée, Sylvain
Gauvrit, Nicolas
and
Dieguez, Sebastian
2018.
Creationism and conspiracism share a common teleological bias.
Current Biology,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 16,
p.
R867.
Douglas, Karen M.
and
Sutton, Robbie M.
2018.
Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis.
European Review of Social Psychology,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 1,
p.
256.
Dentith, M R. X.
2019.
Conspiracy theories on the basis of the evidence.
Synthese,
Vol. 196,
Issue. 6,
p.
2243.
Bezalel, Glenn Y.
2021.
Conspiracy Theories and Religion: Reframing Conspiracy Theories as Bliks.
Episteme,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
674.
Dieguez, Sebastian
and
Wagner-Egger, Pascal
2021.
L’irrationnel aujourd’hui.
p.
323.
Sturm, Tristan
and
Albrecht, Tom
2021.
‘Constituent Covid-19 apocalypses: contagious conspiracism, 5G, and viral vaccinations’.
Anthropology & Medicine,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
p.
122.
Smith, Nicholas
2022.
A Quasi-Fideist Approach to QAnon.
Social Epistemology,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 3,
p.
360.
Duetz, J. C. M.
2022.
Conspiracy Theories are Not Beliefs.
Erkenntnis,
Cíbik, Matej
and
Hardoš, Pavol
2022.
Conspiracy theories and reasonable pluralism.
European Journal of Political Theory,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 3,
p.
445.
Dentith, M R. X.
2022.
Suspicious conspiracy theories.
Synthese,
Vol. 200,
Issue. 3,
Hattersley, Michael
Brown, Gordon D.A.
Michael, John
and
Ludvig, Elliot A.
2022.
Of tinfoil hats and thinking caps: Reasoning is more strongly related to implausible than plausible conspiracy beliefs.
Cognition,
Vol. 218,
Issue. ,
p.
104956.
Tsapos, Melina
2023.
Who is a Conspiracy Theorist?.
Social Epistemology,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
454.
Dentith, M R. X.
2023.
The Future of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theory: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Conspiracy Theory Theory.
Social Epistemology,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
405.