Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T16:23:33.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Change in urgent psychiatric consultations during the first lockdown in Venezia: a multicenter, retrospective study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

S. Rosson*
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS3 Serenissima, VENEZIA Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
A. Sanseverino
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS3 Serenissima, VENEZIA
F. Baggio
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS3 Serenissima, VENEZIA
G. Zanuttigh
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS3 Serenissima, VENEZIA
J. Tubini
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS3 Serenissima, VENEZIA
M. Bianco
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS3 Serenissima, VENEZIA
M. De Rossi
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS3 Serenissima, VENEZIA
E. Gallo
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the mental health of the global population (Dragioti et al. J Med Virol 2022;94(5):1935-49). The first lockdown brought the hardest and most sudden impact on work, educational, social, and recreational activities. Moreover, the fruition of mental health services was restricted, and non-urgent appointments were delayed or converted into telepsychiatry. Thus, it was reasonable to hypothesize different trends of urgent consultations regarding mental health.

Objectives

To detect quantitative and qualitative changes in patients presenting to our Emergency Departments (ED) during the early phase of the pandemic compared to the previous year.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study in Venezia (historical center, mainland) through systematically reviewing the psychiatric consultations in our ED, during the first 16 weeks since 8-Mar-2020 and the same period of 2019. The protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee as UPSI-19 (Urgent PSychiatric consultations In COVID-19). The statistical analysis was conducted with the software R; Interval Risk Ratio (IRR) with 95% CI was calculated for absolute frequency, primary diagnosis, leading symptoms, and outcomes of these consultations.

Results

In the early phase of the pandemic, in our ED we assisted to a significant decrease in psychiatric consultations: 372 vs 441, IRR=0.84(0.73-0.96). Data revealed a reduction of referral for suicidal behavior (IRR=0.52(0.33-0.80)) and anxiety symptoms (IRR=0.60(0.42-0.87)). Primary diagnoses of patients were not different between the two periods explored. There was a slight increase in admissions (150 vs 121), and a significant decrease in less severe clinical pictures.

Conclusions

In the timeframe considered, we assisted to a significant decrease in referrals from the ED, possibly related both to fewer non-locals and to less frequent non-severe presentations. Despite the type of patients (for underlying diagnoses) remained unmodified, an interesting reduction of anxiety symptoms and suicidal behavior was noticed. Literature from ED studies during the first wave are consistent with our finding regarding the number of visits; suicide attempts seemed unmodified or decreased elsewhere (Giner et al. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2022;24(1):1-10). Limitations of our study include peculiarities of the Venetian territory, limited sample and time of observation. Future directions encompass the integration with data from the community setting and later developments.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.