Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T11:49:19.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Course of psychopathology in the at-risk mental state - outcomes beyond transition to psychosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

S. Ruhrmann
Affiliation:
Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
F. Schultze-Lutter
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
R.K.R. Salokangas
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland
D. Linszen
Affiliation:
Dept. of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
M. Birchwood
Affiliation:
Dept. of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
G. Juckel
Affiliation:
Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
A. Heinz
Affiliation:
Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
S. Lewis
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
J. Klosterkötter
Affiliation:
Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Research on at-risk states of psychosis has mainly aimed to predict conversion. Yet as a considerable number of patients does not to progress to this outcome during the investigated observation periods, the course of these non-converters (NC) is of major interest, particularly with regard to preventive interventions and treatment.

Aims

To analyze the psychopathological and functional in 18-month non-converters.

Methods

Data were derived from the prospective multicenter European Prediction of Psychosis Study with an 18-month follow-up period. Participants had to fulfill ultra-high risk criteria and/or the COGDIS criterion, which is based on a set of cognitive basic symptoms. Psychopathology was assessed with the Structure Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS), including the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) and a short version of the Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument (SPI-A).

Results

All total and subscale scores improved significantly during follow-up. However, a more detailed analysis revealed that a considerable part of the patients showed no improvement or even a worsening of psychopathology and function.

Conclusions

Our first analysis of course on non-converters shows that a high proportion of patients improved. In the light of results from retrospective studies, however, this improvement has to be interpreted with caution, as the observation period does not allow to determine the proportion of outpost syndromes, i.e. precursors of a later prodrome. Furthermore, a considerable portion of our sample worsened functionally and/or symptomatically. With regard to retrospective schizophrenia related results, very long observation periods may be needed to characterize the patterns of course in subpsychotic syndromes.

Type
S08-01
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.