Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T19:29:57.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-0483 – Who expects What Influences What they Get: the Prediction of Therapy Outcome by Various Types of Expectancies and the Influence of Therapist Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

A. Visla
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania ; Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
T. Krieger
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland
C. Flückiger
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland ; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Switzerland
M. Grosse Holtforth
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland ; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Patients’expectancies have long been considered to contribute to treatment outcome. Whereas research has concentrated on different types of expectancies in predicting outcome, it has not examined their interactive contribution, therapist factors, nor the development of expectancies over time. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the independent as well as the interactive contributions of outcome expectancies (OE) and negative mood regulation expectancies (NMRE) to outcome. One hundred and fourty depressed outpatients in cognitive-behavior psychotherapy completed measures of OE and NMRE at pretreatment and midtreatment, as well as outcome measures at midtreatment and posttreatment. Patients’ OE were assessed using the Patients’ Therapy Expectation and Evaluation Questionnaire (PATHEV; Schulte, 2005), and the short form of the Negative Mood Regulation Scale (NMR; Backenstrass et al., 2010). Outcome was measured using the German version of the Beck Depression Inventory – II (BDI-II; Hautzinger, Keller, & Kühner, 2006), and the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated 30-item version (IDS-C; Rush, Carmody, & Reimitz, 2000). We will perform three-level multiple longitudinal hierarchical analysis, with different assessment time points as the first level, nested in patients (second level), which are nested in therapists (third level), controlling for comorbidities. We expect OE and NMRE to change significantly during therapy, and these changes to be related to outcome, both at midtreatment and posttreatment. We also expect to find a significant interaction between OE and NMRE in predicting outcome, as well as a significant influence of therapists on patients's expectancies. Theoretical and clinical implications of the results will be discussed.

Type
P29 - Psychotherapy
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.