Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T23:51:32.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving the Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia (FM) in Europe: Identification of Factors that Aid in the Detection of FM [PW09-01]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

E. Serra
Affiliation:
Pain Unit, CHU Nord, Amiens, Paris
S. Perrot
Affiliation:
Internal Department and Pain Unit, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris
I. Guillemin
Affiliation:
Mapi Values, Lyon, France
C. Dias Barbosa
Affiliation:
Mapi Values, Lyon, France
B. Arnould
Affiliation:
Mapi Values, Lyon, France
R. Baron
Affiliation:
Department of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aim:

Prior to facing the challenges of FM management, an initial diagnosis must be made. To guide general practitioners (GPs) in the early detection of FM in Europe, we developed an easy-to-use screening tool specific to FM.

Method:

A European multidisciplinary expert group was constituted with the aim of providing clinical expertise, defining methodology, and identifying key issues around the detection of FM. Three conceptual models describing factors that may contribute to the identification of FM patients were derived from; a) a comprehensive literature review, 2) clinician focus groups (N=6), and 3) face-to-face interviews with German, French, and English-speaking patients (N=29) conducting by psychologists to explore their attitudes and perceptions of the disease. A FM screening tool was developed in all three languages and tested for comprehension and applicability in FM-diagnosed and FM-suspected patients.

Results:

The models derived from the literature, clinician focus groups, and FM patient interviews showed high consistency. The resulting FM screening tool is comprised of 14 questions that describe patients’ pain, fatigue, associated symptoms, impact on everyday life, personal history, and attitudes towards their FM.

Conclusion:

Based on this qualitative study, the detection of FM is likely to require the assessment of multiple psychological factors in addition to symptoms, including patient reporting of personal history and patient behaviour. The quantitative validation of these findings is currently underway.

Type
PW09-01
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2009
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.