Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T14:49:38.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P01-208-Prevalence of hypomania in patients with diagnosis of affective disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

I. Garcia Del Castillo
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Hospital
L. Fernandez Mayo
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Hospital
R. Carmona Camacho
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Hospital
M.J. Martin Calvo
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Hospital
E. Serrano Drozdowskyj
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Hospital
S. Ovejero García
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
E. Baca García
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Recent epidemiological studies suggest that the prevalence of bipolar disorder might be misdiagnosed initially as unipolar depression due to the difficulty to detect episodes of hypomania. The Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32), validated in Spanish, is a self-report questionnaire with 32 hypomania items designed to screen for hypomanic episodes.

Objectives

To examine the prevalence of hypomania in patients with unipolar depression. Corroborate the efficacy of the HCL-32 to detect symptoms of hypomania.

Methods

The presence of hypomanic symptoms was assessed by the HCL-32 in a sample of 128 subjects diagnosed with bipolar I disorder (n = 30), bipolar II disorder (n = 1), unipolar depression (n = 57), and anxiety disorder (n = 15) according to DSM-IV-TR criteria. A control group of healthy subjects was selected (n = 25).

Results

The discriminative capacity was analyzed by the ROC curve. The AUC was 0.65 which did not indicate a good capacity. The sensitivity (S), specificity (E) and prevalence (P) of hypomania in unipolar patients for the following cut-off points were :14: S = 81.6%,95%CI(69.8, 93.5); E = 30.1%,95%CI(19.7,40.6); P = 74.1%; 15: S = 77.6%,95%CI(64.9,90.3); E = 37.4%,95%CI(26.3,48.4); P = 67.2%; 16: S = 59.2%,95%CI(44.4,73.9); E = 55.4%,95%CI(44.1,74.0); P = 51.7%; 17: S = 55.1%,95%CI(40.2,70.1); E = 57.8%,95%CI(46.6,69.1); P = 48.3%.

Conclusions

The HCL-32 has a high sensitivity but a low specificity as screening instrument. This might explain the high proportion of hypomania found in this study. The difference with previous studies is that our sample was heterogeneous, unstable and serious. This suggests that the HCL-32 is not valid for any psychiatric sample. Future research should develop more specific instruments with better external validity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.