Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T13:02:00.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural neuroimaging differentiates between depressed bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder patients: a machine learning study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

F. Calesella*
Affiliation:
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
F. Colombo
Affiliation:
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
B. Bravi
Affiliation:
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
L. Fortaner-Uyà
Affiliation:
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
C. Monopoli
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
E. Tassi
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, IRCCS Fondazione Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
E. Maggioni
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, IRCCS Fondazione Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
I. Bollettini
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
S. Poletti
Affiliation:
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
F. Benedetti
Affiliation:
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
B. Vai
Affiliation:
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Depression is the predominant mood alteration in bipolar disorder (BD), leading to overlapping symptomatology with major depressive disorder (MDD). Consequently, in clinical assessment, almost 60% of BD patients are misdiagnosed as affected by MDD. This calls for the creation of a framework for the differentiation of BD and MDD patients based on reliable biomarkers. Since machine learning (ML) enables to make predictions at the single-subject level, it appears to be particularly suitable for this task.

Objectives

We implemented a ML pipeline for the differentiation between depressed BD and MDD patients based on structural neuroimaging features.

Methods

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were acquired for 282 depressed BD (n=180) and MDD (n=102) patients. Axial (AD), radial (RD), mean (MD) diffusivity, and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps were extracted from DTI images, and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) measures were obtained from T1-weighted images. Each feature was entered separately into a 5-fold nested cross-validated ML pipeline differentiating between BD and MDD patients, comprising: confound regression for nuisance variables removal (i.e., age and sex), feature standardization, principal component analysis, and an elastic-net penalized regression. The models underwent 5000 random permutations as a test for significance, and the McNemar’s test was used to assess whether there was any significant difference between the models (significance threshold was set to p<0.05).

Results

The performance of the models and the results of the permutation tests are summarized in Table 1. McNemar’s test showed that the AD-, RD-, MD-, and FA-based models did not differ between each other and were significantly different from the VBM.Table 1.Models’ performance and p-value at 5000 permutation test.

FeatureOverall accuracyMDD specifictiyBD sensitivityp-value
VBM0.610.380.740.058
AD0.780.650.86<0.001
FA0.790.610.89<0.001
MD0.790.630.88<0.001
RD0.790.630.88<0.001

Conclusions

In conclusion, our models differentiated between BD and MDD patients at the single-subject level with good accuracy using structural MRI data. Notably, the models based on white matter integrity measures relying on true information, rather than chance.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.