Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T01:27:20.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TTe Predictive Power of the Wisconsin Scales of Schizophrenia Proneness in Patients of an Early Detection Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

R. Flückiger
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
S.J. Schmidt
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
C. Michel
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
J. Klosterkötter
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
B.G. Schimmelmann
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
S. Ruhrmann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Bern, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Schizotypy is regarded as a subthreshold expression or precursor of schizophrenia spectrum psychosis.

Objectives

Schizotypal personality disorder is a risk factor of the ‘genetic risk and functional decline’ criterion of the ultra-high risk (UHR) criteria for psychosis; and its positive features are part of attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS) of the UHR criteria. Furthermore, schizotypy as assessed with the Wisconsin Scales of Schizophrenia Proneness (WSSP) 'Perceptual Aberration”, 'Magical Ideation”, and 'Social Anhedonia” but not 'Physical Anhedonia” was predictive of psychosis in the community.

Aims/Methods

Thus, we examined the psychosis-predictive value of the for WSSP in 128 patients seeking help at an early detection service (23+/-7 yrs; 56% male; 81% at-risk for UHR and/or basic symptom criteria) with a median follow-up of 24 (1-101) months by Cox regression.

Results

Within 48 months; 36 patients converted to psychosis. Unexpectedly, none of the four WSSP was a significant predictor of conversion. This negative finding was replicated when the positive (Perceptual Aberration and Magical Ideation) and negative (both Anhedonia scales) dimension were examined. Thus, although schizotypy scales might be able to identify a more extreme range of the psychotic continuum in the community, they lack the ability to further separate ‘true’ from ‘false’ risk cases in a clinical sample already representing this more extreme range of the psychotic continuum.

Conclusions

This indicates that WSSP might be useful rather as an initial screening for persons potentially at-risk for current criteria in the community than as additional predictors in already identified risk patients.

Type
Article: 0922
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.