Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T18:26:39.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new post-early Cambrian archaeocyath from Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Rachel A. Wood ,
Kevin R. Evans  and
Andrey Yu. Zhuravlev
Rachel A. Wood
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, U.K.
Kevin R. Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 120 Lindley Hall, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, U.S.A.
Andrey Yu. Zhuravlev
Affiliation:
Palaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsuyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow B-321, Russian Federation
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new species of archaeocyath sponge, Dictyocyathus neptunensis, is described from the lower third of the Nelson Limestone of the Neptune Range, Antarctica. Based on the presence of the trilobites Nelsonia schesis and Amphoton oatesi, these strata are interpreted to be mid- to late middle Cambrian in age. D. neptunensis shows a branching, low integration modular form and a very simple skeletal type. Such an organization is predicted from known morphological trends within the early Cambrian Archaeocyatha. Specimens are not in life position, and probably form part of a storm deposit. The absence of Dictyocyathus from latest early Cambrian (Toyonian) strata worldwide suggests a convergent nature for this highly simplified skeletal type in archaeocyaths.

Type
Rapid Communications
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 129 , Issue 4 , July 1992 , pp. 491 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astashkin, V. A., Pegel, T. V., Repina, L. N., Rozanov, A. Yu., Shabanov, Yu. Ya., Zhuravlev, A. Yu., Sukhov, S. S. & Sundukov, V. M. 1991. CambrianSystem on the Siberian platform. International Union of Geological Sciences Publication 27, 1–133.Google Scholar
Bornemann, J. G. 1884. Berichtete über die Fortsetzung seiner Untersuchungen cambrischer Archaeocyathus – Formen und verwandler Organismen von der Insel Sardinien. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 36, 702–6.Google Scholar
Bornemann, J. G. 1886. Die Versteinerungen des Cambrischen Schichtensystemsder Insel Sardinien nebst vergleichenden Untersuchungen über analogie Vorko-mnisse aus andern Landern. Erste Abt. III. Archaeo-cyathinae. NovaActa Academia Caesar-Leopoldina-Carol 51, 28–78.Google Scholar
Bornemann, J. G. 1891. Zweite Abt. nachschrift, iii, Archaeocyathininae. Nova Acta Academia Caesar-Leopoldina-Carol 56, 495–500.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F., Rozanov, A. Yu. & Webers, G. F. 1984. Upper Cambrian Archaeocyatha from Antarctica. Geological Magazine 121, 291–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Kruse, P. D. 1989. Cambrian Antarctic archaeocyaths. In Origins and evolution of the Antarctic biota (ed. Crame, J. A.), pp. 15–28. Geological Society of London Special Publication no. 47.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Zhuravlev, A. Yu. (in press.) Irregular archaeocyaths. Cahiers de Paléontologie, CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I. & Savitskiy, V. E. 1969. Stratigrafiya i biofatsii kembriya sibirskoy platformy (Zapadnoe Prianabar'e). [Cambrian stratigraphyand biofacies of the Siberian Platform (Western Anabar area)]. Trudy Sibirskogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo Instituta Geologii, Geofiziki i Mineral'nogo Syr'ya 43, 3–408 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Evans, K. R., Rowell, A. J. & Rees, M. N. (in press.) Sea-level fluctuations and the evolution of a Middle Cambrian carbonate ramp, Neptune Range. Antarctic Journal of the United States, 1991 Review Volume.Google Scholar
Fonin, V. D. 1960. O novum semeystvye kembriyskikh metatsiatid – Prismocyathidae Fonin fam. n. [On a new family of Cambrian metacyathids –Prismocyathidae Fonin fam. n.] Doklady of the Academy of Sciences, USSR 135, 725–7 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Fonin, V. D. 1982. Archaeocyaths. In The Precambrian/Cambrian boundary in the geosynclinal areas (The reference section of Salany-Gol. M.P.R.) (eds. Rozanov, A. Yu. et al. ), pp. 83–109. The joint Soviet-Mongolian Palaeontological Expedition, Transaction 18.Google Scholar
Okulitch, V.J. 1935. Cyathospongia – A new class of Porifera to include the Archaeocyathinae. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada 3, 75–106.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. & Gatehouse, C. G. 1972. Early and Middle Cambrian trilobites from Antarctica. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 456-D, D1–D37.Google Scholar
Rowell, A. J., Rees, M. N. & Evans, K. R. 1992. Evidence of a major Middle Cambrian deformation in the Ross orogen, Antarctica. Geology 20, 31–4.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. L., Williams, P. L., Nelson, W. H. & Ege, J. R. 1965. UpperPrecambrian and Paleozoic stratigraphy and structure of the Neptune Range, Antarctica. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 525-D, D112–119.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 1990. Evolutionary diversification of echinoderms during the early Palaeozoic. In Major Evolutionary Radiations (eds Taylor, P. D. & Lar-wood, G. P.), pp. 265–86. Systematics Association Vol. 42, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Solov'ev, I. A. & Popov, L. E. 1984. Novye dannye o verkhnekembriyskoy faune gor Elsuert i Pensakola (zapadnaya Antarktika). [New data on theUpper Cambrian fauna of the Ellsworth and Pensacola Mountains (western Antarctica).] Antarktika 23, 46–71 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Taylor, T. G. 1910. The Archaeocyathinae from the Cambrian of South Australia. Memoirs of the Royal Society of South Australia 2, 1–188.Google Scholar
Troger, K. A. & Weber, W. 1985. Descriptions of a Cambrian fauna from the Neptune Range, Pensacola Mountains, Antarctica. Zeitschrift für geologischen Wissenschaften, Berlin 13, 359–67.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. L. 1950. An Upper Cambrian pleospongid(?). Journal of Paleontology 24, 591–3.Google Scholar
Wood, R. A., Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Debrenne, F. 1992. Functional biology and ecology of Archaeocyatha. Palaios 7, 131–56.Google Scholar