Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T16:35:47.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On certain Anthracomyas from the Similis-Pulchra Zone of the Coal Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Summary

(1) Reasons are given for believing that the holotype of Anthracomya adamsi Salter (the genotype of Anthracomya) has been correctly identified.

(2) It is shown that the horizon of this presumed holotype is near the middle of the Similis-Pulchra Zone, and is near if not identical with the horizon of A. hindi Wright.

(3) Anthracomya adamsi at that horizon has no close connection with A. modiolaris (from which it may, however, have been derived at a lower horizon). The distinction of these two forms is discussed, and it is suggested that among well preserved specimens only very occasional variants cause any difficulty in identification. The shells referred to A. adamsi. s. lat. by Weir and Leitch from the base of the Similis-Pulchra Zone (1936) are not considered in this paper.

(4) The relations of A. adamsi, A. hindi and A. warei are briefly discussed: in view of the limited distribution of the various species it is thought best for the present to retain the three specific names.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Davies, J. H., and Trueman, A. E., 1927. “A Revision of the Non-Marine Lamellibranchs of the Coal Measures,” etc., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxiii, p. 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dix, E., and Trueman, A. E., 1931. “Some Non-Marine Lamellibranchs from the Upper Part of the Coal Measures. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxvii, p. 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, W. H., and Simpson, B., 1934. “The Coal Measures of the Maesteg District, South Wales,“ Proc. S. Wales Inst. Eng., xlix, p. 447.Google Scholar
Hind, Wheelton., 1894–1896. “A Monograph on Carbonicola, Anthracomya and Naiadites,” Palaeont. Soc. London.Google Scholar
Robertson, T., 1927. “Geology of the South Wales Coalfields.” Part II, Abergavenny. 2nd edit., Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
Robertson, T., 1933. “Geology of the South Wales Coalfields.” Part V, Merthyr Tydfil. 2nd edit., Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W., 1861. “On the Fossils of the South Wales Coalfield: Part I—Ironstones of the North Crop.Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
Trueman, A. E., 1933. “A Suggested Correlation of the Coal Measures of England and Wales,” Proc. S. Wales Inst. Eng., xlix, p. 63.Google Scholar
Ware, W. D., 1930. “An Account of the Geology of the Cefn Coed Sinkings.” Proc. S. Wales Inst., xlvi, p. 453.Google Scholar
Weir, J., and Leitch, D., 1936. “The Zonal Distribution of the Non-Marine Lamellibranchs in the Coal Measures of Scotland,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., lviii, p. 697.Google Scholar
Wright, W. B., 1929. “The Zonal Succession in the Coal Measures around Manchester,” Summ. Progress Geol. Surv. for 1928, pt. ii, p. 36.Google Scholar
Wright, W. B., 1930. “Additions to the Fauna of the Lancashire Coal Measures,” Mem. and Proc. Manch. Lit. and Phil. Soc., 74, p. 41.Google Scholar
Wright, W. B., 1931. In “The Geology of Manchester,” Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
Wright, W. B., 1938A. “The Anthracomyas of the Lancashire Coalfield,” etc., Summ. Progress Geol. Surv. for 1936, pt. ii, p. 10.Google Scholar
Wright, W. B., 1938B. In “The Geology of Wigan,” Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar