1 Starr, C., ‘Social Benefit versus Technological Risk, Science, 165 (1969), pp. 1232–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

2 Douglas, M., ‘Environments at Risk’, in Benthall, J. (ed.), Ecology: The Shaping Enquiry, London, Longman, 1972, pp. 129–45Google Scholar (first published in The Times Literary Supplement, 1970).

3 For evidence of this switch see Royal Society, ‘Symposium on Science, Policy and Risk’, reported in the Times Higher Education Supplement, 14 March 1997, pp. 108–21; and Stern, P. C., and Fineberg, H. V. (eds), Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, Washington DC, National Academy Press, 1996.Google Scholar Also The Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy, Sustained Risk: A Lasting Phenomenon, Reports to the Government No. 44, The Hague, Scientific Council for Government Policy, 1995.

4 Royal Society, Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management, London, The Royal Society, 1992.Google Scholar

5 Royal Society, Risk Assessment: A Study Group Report, London, The Royal Society, 1983.Google Scholar

6 Douglas, M., ‘The Depoliticization of Risk, in Ellis, R. J. and Thompson, M. (eds), Culture Matters: Essays in Honor of Aaron Wildavsky, Boulder, Colo., Westview, 1997, pp. 121–32.Google Scholar

7 Royal Society, op. cit.

8 The research report, O’Riordan, T., Marris, C. and Langford, I., ‘No Cause for Alarm’, New Scientist, 28 09 1996 , pp. 36–9,Google Scholar which revealed that low esteem, provided much of the stimulus for the Royal Society’s meeting.

9 Beck, U., The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London, Sage, 1992.Google Scholar

10 Forester, F. Fischer, and J. (eds), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, London, UCL Press, 1993.Google Scholar

11 Habermas, J., Theory of Communicative Action, Boston, Beacon Press, 1981.Google Scholar

12 Hajer, M. A., The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

13 Harris, L., Tarrance, V. L. and Lake, C. C., The Rising Tide: Public Opinion, Policy and Politics, Washington DC, Americans for the Environment, 1989.Google Scholar

14 Hays, S. P., (in collaboration with B. D. Hays), Beauty, Health and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States 1955–1985, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 White, L., ‘The Historical Roots of our Ecological Crisis’, Science, 155:10 (1967), pp. 1203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Berry, T., The Dream of the Earth, San Francisco, Sierra Club, 1988.Google Scholar

17 Rolston, H., Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World, Philadelphia, Penn., Temple University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

18 Nash, R., The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.Google Scholar

19 Herberlein, T. A., ‘The Land Ethic Realized: Some Social‐Psychological Explanations for Changing Environmental Attitudes’, Journal of Social Issues, 28:4 (1972), pp. 79–87.Google Scholar

20 Leopold, A., A Sand County Almanac, with Essays in Conservation from Round River, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1949 Google Scholar (reprinted 1970 by Ballantine Books, New York).

21 Dunlap, R. E. and Van Liere, K. D., ‘Land Ethic or Golden Rule: Comment on “Land Ethic Realized” by Thomas A. Heberlein’, Journal of Social Issues 33:3 (1977), pp. 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 MacLean, D., ‘A Moral Requirement for Energy Policies’, in MacLean, D. and Brown, P. (eds), Energy and the Future, Totowa, NJ, Rowman & Littlefield, 1983.Google Scholar

23 Thompson, M. and Rayner, S., ‘Cultural Discourses’, in Rayner, S. and Malone, E. M. (eds), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 1: The Societal Framework, Columbus, Ohio, Battelle Press, 1998.Google Scholar

24 Whyte, A. V. T. and Harrison, M. R., Public Perception of Weather and Climate Change: Report on a Pilot Study in Ontario, Ottawa, Atmospheric Environment Service, 1981;Google Scholar Doble, J., Richardson, A. and Danks, A., Danks Science and the Public: A Report in Three Volumes, Vol. 3: Global Warming Caused by the Greenhouse Effect, New York, Public Agenda Fund, 1990;Google Scholar LÖfstedt, R. E., ‘Climate Change Perceptions and Energy Use Decisions in Northern Sweden’, Global Environmental Change, 4 (1991), pp. 321–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Henderson‐Sellers, A., ‘Australian Public Perception of the Greenhouse Issue’, Climatic Change: 1(1990), pp. 69–96;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Kempton, W., ‘Lay Perspectives on Global Climate Change’, Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 1:3 (1991), pp. 183–208;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Hedges, A., Attitudes to Energy Conservation in the Home, London, HMSO, 1991;Google Scholar LÖfstedt, R. E., ‘Lay Perspectives Concerning Global Climate Change in Vienna, Austria’, Energy and Environment, 4 (1993), pp. 140–54;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischoff, B. and Read, D., ‘What Do People Know about Climate Change? Part 1: Mental Models’, Risk Analysis, 14:6 (1994), pp. 959–70;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischoff, B. and Smuts, T., ‘What Do People Know about Climate Change? Part 2: Survey Studies of Educated Lay People’, Risk Analysis, 14 (1994), pp. 971–82;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Kempton, W., Boster, J. S. and Hartley, J. A., Environmental Values in American Culture, Boston, MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar

26 Ibid.

27 Morgan, M. G., Fischoff, B., Bostrom, A., Lave, L. and Atman, C. J., ‘Communicating Risk to the Public’, Environmental Science and Technology, 26 (1992), pp. 2048–56.Google Scholar

28 Bostrom, A., Fischoff, B. and Morgan, M. G., ‘Characterizing Mental Models of Hazardous Processes: A Methodology and an Application to Radon’, Journal of Social Issues, 48 (1992), pp. 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Read et al., op. cit.

30 Kempton, op. cit.

31 Kempton et al., op. cit.

32 McDaniels, T., Axelrod, L. J. and Slovic, P., Lay Perceptions of Ecological Risks from Global Climate Change, report, Westwater Research Center, University of British Columbia, 1995.Google Scholar

33 Weinberg, A. M., ‘Can Technology Replace Social Engineering?’, University of Chicago Magazine, LIX (10 1966), pp. 6–10 Google Scholar; Stern, P. C., ‘Blind Spots and Policy Analysis: What Economics Doesn’t Say about Energy Use’, journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5 (1986), pp. 200–27;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Schipper, L., Bartlett, S., Hawk, D. and Vine, E., ‘Linking Lifestyles and Energy Use: A Matter of Time’, Annual Review of Energy, 14 (1989), pp. 273–320;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Kempton, W., ‘Will Public Environmental Concern Lead to Action on Global Warming?’, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 18 (1993), pp. 217–45;CrossRefGoogle Scholar LÖfstedt, R. E., ‘Why are Public Perception Studies of the Environment Ignored?’, Global Environmental Change, 5:2 (1995), pp. 83–5;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Ludlum, D. M., ‘The Climythology of America’, Weatherwise, 40 (10 1987), pp. 255–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 LÖfstedt, ‘Why are Public Perception Studies of the Environment Ignored?’

35 Hedges, op. cit.

36 Kempton, op. cit.

37 Kempton et al., op. cit.

38 Farhar, B. C., ‘The Public Decides about Weather Modification’, Environment and Behaviour, 9:3 (1977), pp. 279–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 Ludlum, op. cit.

40 Williamson, H., ‘An Attempt to Account for the Change Observed in the Middle Colonies in North America’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 1 (1771), pp. 272–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 Houghton, J., ‘Me and My God’, London, Sunday Telegraph, 10 09 1995 .Google Scholar

42 Inglehart, R., The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1977;Google Scholar Inglehart, R., Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

43 Steger, M. A. E., Pierce, J. C., Steel, B. S. and Lovrich, N. P., ‘Political Culture, Postmaterial Values, and the New Environmental Paradigm: A Comparative Analysis of Canada and the United States’ Political Behavior, 3 (1989), pp. 233–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44 Steel, B. S., Soden, D. L. and Warner, R. L., ‘The Impact of Knowledge and Values on Perceptions of Environmental Risk to the Great Lakes, Society and Natural Resources, 4 (1990), pp. 331–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 Van Liere, K. D. and Dunlap, R. E., ‘The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 2 (1980), pp. 181–97;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Samdahl, D. and Robertson, R., ‘Social Determinants of Environmental Concern: Specification and Test of the Model, Environment and Behavior, 1 (1989), pp. 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46 Jaeger, C., Durrenger, G., Hastenholz, H. and Truffer, B., ‘Determinants of Environmental Action with regard to Climate Change’, Climatic Change, 23 (1993), pp. 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 Steger, M. A. E. and Witt, S. L., ‘Gender Differences in Environmental Orientations: A Comparison of Publics and Activists in Canada and the US’, Western Political Quarterly, 4 (1989), pp. 627–49.Google Scholar

48 Samdahl and Robertson, op. cit.

49 Ester, P. and van der Meer, F., ‘Determinants of Individual Environmental Behavior: An Outline of a Behavioral Model and Some Research Findings’, The Netherlands Journal of Sociology, 1 (1982), pp. 57–94;Google Scholar Gray, D. B., Borden, R. J. and Weigel, R. H., Ecological Beliefs and Behaviors, Assessment and Change, Westport, Conn., Greenwood Press, 1985;Google Scholar Diekmann, A. and Preisendorfer, R., ‘PersÖnliches Umweltverhalten: Diskrepanzen zwischen Anspruch and Wirklichkeit’, Kolner Zeitschrift für Sociologie and Sozialpsychologie, 44 (1992), pp. 169–93.Google Scholar

50 Cotgrove, S., Catastrophe or Cornucopia: The Environment, Politics and the Future, Chichester, John Wiley, 1982;Google Scholar Liere, Van et al., op. cit.; Dunlap, R. E., ‘Commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm and Concern for Environmental Quality’, Social Science Quarterly, 4 (1994), pp. 1013–28.Google Scholar

51 Jaeger et al., op. cit.

52 Van Liere and Dunlop, op. cit.

53 Samdahl and Robertson, op. cit.

54 Jaeger et at., op. cit.

55 Nash, R., Wilderness and the American Mind, New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

56 Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and Behrens III, W. W., The Limits to Growth, New York, Universe, 1972;Google Scholar Cotgrove, , op. cit.; Bloomfield, B. P., Modelling the World: The Social Constructions of Systems Analysts, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar

57 Cotgrove, op. cit.

58 Ibid.

59 Williamson, O., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York, Free Press, 1975;Google Scholar Lindblom, C., Politics and Markets: The World’s Political and Economic Systems, New York, Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar

60 Kempton et al., op. cit.

61 Ibid.

62 Holling, C. S., ‘The Resilience of Terrestrial Ecosystems’, in Clark, W. C. and Munn, R. (eds), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 292–388.Google Scholar

63 Cronon, W., ‘A Place for Stories: Nature, History and Narrative’, Journal of American History, 78 (1992), pp. 1347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64 Ibid.

65 Ibid.

66 Linderman, F., Plenty Coups: Chief of the Crows, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1930 (reprinted 1962).Google Scholar

67 Thompson, M., ‘Welche Gesellschaftsklassen sind potent genug, anderen ihre Zukunft aufzuoktroyieren?, in Burchardt, L. (ed.), Design der Zukunft, Cologne, Dumont 1987, pp. 58–87.Google Scholar

68 Timmerman, P., ‘Myths and Paradigms of Interactions between Development and Environment’, in Clark and Munn, 1986, pp. 435–52.Google Scholar

69 Holling, op. cit.

70 Ibid.