No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Entrepreneurial Philanthropy at Cromford, Quarry Bank, and Saltaire Mills during the Industrial Revolution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2024
Abstract
This article offers a spatial examination of entrepreneurial philanthropy at Cromford, Quarry Bank, and Saltaire mills during the industrial revolution. It argues that entrepreneurial philanthropy at these mills, with its new social relations, was influenced by both market competition and philanthropy, to the extent that active welfare provision was dependent on profitable enterprise and creation of wealth. It demonstrates that the extent and nature of philanthropy intended, implemented, and experienced at each of these entrepreneurial projects was determined by site-specific factors with unique effects in space and time. The article builds on existing research into the socially transformative impact of the industrial revolution by developing the concept of philanthropic space to enable a fresh assessment of the relationship between capital and welfare. It suggests that, within these communities, the development of philanthropic space addressed some of the causes and effects of discontent of the working classes associated with the ‘condition-of-England question’. In particular, the discipline of education became an increasingly important component of both enhanced philanthropic development by owners and the experience of workers, offering opportunities for self-improvement. At the same time, discipline and control were ostensibly paradoxical within, yet established and essential features of, philanthropic space.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
1 Shepherd, Alice and Toms, Steven, ‘Entrepreneurship, strategy, and business philanthropy: cotton textiles in the British industrial revolution’, Business History Review, 93 (2019), pp. 503–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 504.
2 Lefebvre, Henri, The production of space, trans. Nicholson-Smith, Donald (Oxford, 1991), pp. 38–9Google Scholar.
3 Kilian, Ted, ‘Public and private, power and space’, in Light, Andrew and Smith, Jonathan M., eds., The production of public space (Lanham, MD, 1998), pp. 115–34Google Scholar, at p. 129.
4 Massey, Doreen B., For space (London, 2005), p. 13Google Scholar.
5 Griffin, Emma, Liberty’s dawn: a people’s history of the industrial revolution (New Haven, CT, 2013), p. 247CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Honeyman, Katrina, ‘The Poor Law, the parish apprentice, and the textile industries in the north of England, 1780–1830’, Northern History, 44 (2007), pp. 115–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 123.
7 Thompson, Edward, The making of the English working class (2nd edn, Harmondsworth, 1968), p. 353Google Scholar.
8 Gray, Robert, The factory question and industrial England, 1830–1860 (Cambridge, 1996), p. 23Google Scholar.
9 Humphries, Jane, Childhood and child labour in the British industrial revolution (Cambridge, 2010), p. 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Ibid., p. 170.
11 Davidson, Lorna and Arnold, Jim, ‘The great experiment: New Lanark from Robert Owen to World Heritage site’, in Williams, Chris and Thompson, Noel W., eds., Robert Owen and his legacy (Cardiff, 2011), p. 57Google Scholar.
12 Emma Griffin, ‘Diets, hunger, and living standards during the British industrial revolution’, Past and Present, 239 (2018), pp. 71–111, at p. 110.
13 David Harvey, ‘Between space and time: reflections on the geographical imagination’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80 (1990), pp. 418–34, at p. 424.
14 Hugh Cunningham, ‘John Howard, dissent and the early years of philanthropy in Britain’, in Clyde Binfield, G. M. Ditchfield, and David L. Wykes, eds., Protestant dissent and philanthropy in Britain, 1660–1914 (Woodbridge, 2020), p. 67.
15 Cited in ibid., p. 60.
16 Sir Richard Arkwright to Jedediah Strutt, 2 Mar. 1772, Matlock, Derbyshire Record Office (DRO), Arkwright family papers, D6340/1.
17 R. S. Fitton, The Arkwrights: spinners of fortune (Matlock, 2012), p. 7.
18 Ibid., p. 17.
19 Ibid., p. 23.
20 Ibid., p. 27.
21 Ibid., p. 28.
22 Ibid.
23 Andy Wood, ‘Social conflict and change in the mining communities of north-west Derbyshire, c. 1600–1700’, International Review of Social History, 38 (1993), pp. 31–58, at p. 49.
24 Mary B. Rose, The Gregs of Quarry Bank Mill (Cambridge, 1986), p. 19.
25 Ibid., p. 15.
26 Ibid., p. 18.
27 David Sekers, A lady of cotton: Hannah Greg, mistress of Quarry Bank Mill (Stroud, 2013), p. 17.
28 David Sekers, ed., The diary of Hannah Lightbody, 1786–1790, supplement to Enlightenment and Dissent, 24 (2008), p. 26.
29 Sekers, Lady of cotton, p. 159.
30 Jack Reynolds, The great paternalist: Titus Salt and the growth of nineteenth-century Bradford (London, 1983), pp. 45–7.
31 Ibid., p. 70.
32 John Styles, Industry and virtue: Titus Salt and Saltaire (Bradford, 1990), p. 5.
33 Ibid., p. 7.
34 Thomas Carlyle, ‘Chartism’ (1839), in The collected works of Thomas Carlyle (16 vols., London, 1858), ix, pp. 3–4.
35 ‘The gigantic new factory at Saltaire’, Manchester Examiner and Times, 21 Sept. 1853, p. 5.
36 R. S. Fitton and A. P. Wadsworth, The Strutts and the Arkwrights, 1758–1830: a study of the early factory system (Manchester, 1958), p. 70.
37 Barbara Hahn, Technology in the industrial revolution (Cambridge, 2020), p. 103.
38 Rose, Gregs of Quarry Bank Mill, pp. 21–2.
39 Styles, Industry and virtue, p. 10.
40 Fitton and Wadsworth, The Strutts and the Arkwrights, p. 98.
41 ‘Manchester’, Sun, 12 Dec. 1795.
42 ‘Bradford United Reform Club’, Bradford Observer; and Halifax, Huddersfield, and Keighley Reporter, 12 May 1842, p. 6.
43 Fitton, Arkwrights, p. 2.
44 Massey, For space, p. 118.
45 Tables 1 and 2 are taken from a selection of tables attached to the ‘Minutes of evidence taken before the Select Committee on the State of Children Employed in the Manufactories of the United Kingdom’, 25 Apr. 1816, DRO, Arkwright family papers, D978/MB/16. However, on examination it is evident that these tables are almost certainly from 1819. Table no. 24, for example, is clearly dated 22 Apr. 1819. It seems likely that these were parliamentary papers compiled for consideration prior to the Cotton Mills and Factories Act, which was enacted on 22 June 1819.
46 Roger Osborne, Iron, steam, and money: the making of the industrial revolution (London, 2014), p. 321.
47 Thompson, Making of the English working class, pp. 394–5.
48 Honeyman, ‘Poor Law’, p. 128.
49 Arkwright to Strutt, 2 Mar. 1772, DRO, Arkwright family papers, D6340/1.
50 Fitton and Wadsworth, The Strutts and the Arkwrights, p. 50.
51 Ibid., p. 76.
52 ‘Minutes of evidence’.
53 Michel Foucault, ‘The subject and power’, Critical enquiry, 8 (1982), pp. 777–95, at p. 792.
54 Ibid., p. 789.
55 Fitton, Arkwrights, p. 187.
56 Cited in Fitton and Wadsworth, The Strutts and the Arkwrights, p. 102.
57 Derwent Valley Mills, ‘Communities’, http://www.derwentvalleymills.org/discover/derwent-valley-mills-history/derwent-valley-mills-communities/ (accessed 11 Mar. 2024).
58 Rose, Gregs of Quarry Bank Mill, p. 20.
59 David Hanson, Children of the mill: true stories from Quarry Bank (London, 2015), pp. 61–3.
60 Rose, Gregs of Quarry Bank Mill, p. 31.
61 Sekers, Lady of cotton, p. 121.
62 Ibid., p. 171.
63 Ibid., pp. 157–9.
64 Hannah Barker, ‘Historical guide to the apprentice house, Quarry Bank’, hannahbarkerhistory, 2019, https://web.archive.org/web/20221205024844/https://hannahbarker.net/2019/10/19/historical-guide-to-the-apprentice-house-quarry-bank/ (accessed 11 Mar. 2024).
65 Sekers, Lady of cotton, p. 176.
66 Ibid., p. 188.
67 Humphries, Childhood and child labour, p. 365.
68 Sekers, Lady of cotton, pp. 182–3.
69 Frances Collier, The family economy of the working classes in the cotton industry, 1784–1833, ed. R. S. Fitton (Manchester, 1964), p. 44.
70 Ibid., p. 21.
71 Sekers, Lady of cotton, pp. 192–3.
72 ‘The works at Saltaire’, Bradford Observer, 1 Mar. 1855, p. 8.
73 Styles, Industry and virtue, pp. 11–13.
74 Ibid., p. 15.
75 Reynolds, Great paternalist, p. 266.
76 Ibid., p. 270.
77 ‘The progress of Saltaire’, Bradford Observer, 7 Oct. 1868.
78 Reynolds, Great paternalist, p. 278.
79 Ibid., p. 279.
80 Styles, Industry and virtue, p. 22.
81 Reynolds, Great paternalist, p. 276.
82 Ibid., p. 272.
83 ‘The progress of Saltaire’.
84 Marco H. D. van Leeuwen, Elise van Nederveen Meerkirk, and Lex Heerma van Voss, ‘Provisions for the elderly in north-western Europe: an international comparison of almshouses, sixteenth–twentieth centuries’, Scandinavian Economic History Review, 62 (2014), pp. 1–16.
85 Styles, Industry and virtue, p. 23.
86 Lefebvre, Production of space, p. 110.
87 ‘Minutes of evidence’.
88 Thompson, Making of the English working class, p. 397.
89 Davidson and Arnold, ‘Great experiment’, p. 60.
90 Edward Royle, Modern Britain: a social history, 1750–2011 (3rd edn, London, 2012), p. 229.
91 Ibid., p. 451.
92 E. G. West, Education and the industrial revolution (London, 1975), p. 77.
93 Griffin, Liberty’s dawn, p. 17.
94 Massey, For space, p. 154.
95 Griffin, Liberty’s dawn, p. 19.
96 ‘Minutes of evidence’.
97 Francis Stanley to Richard Arkwright Jr, 1795, DRO, Arkwright family papers, D978/MB/12.
98 ‘Minutes of evidence’.
99 Fitton and Wadsworth, The Strutts and the Arkwrights, pp. 104–5.
100 Fitton, Arkwrights, p. 153.
101 Ibid., p. 57.
102 J. Farington, The Farington diary, ed. James Greig, vol. i (3rd edn, London, [1923]), p. 314, available at https://archive.org/details/faringtondiary01fariuoft/page/314/mode/2up.
103 Ibid.
104 Humphries, Childhood and child labour, p. 322.
105 Fitton and Wadsworth, The Strutts and the Arkwrights, p. 99.
106 Fitton, Arkwrights, p. 204.
107 Cited in ibid., p. 101.
108 Apprenticeship indenture of Mary, Ann, and Sarah Lea, 10 Jan. 1785, Manchester Central Library (MCL), Greg papers, GB127.C5/5/1/219.
109 Apprenticeship indenture of John Owen, 20 Oct. 1790, MCL, Greg papers, GB127.C5/5/1/45.
110 Ibid.
111 Statement to magistrates of Thomas Priestley, 2 Aug. 1806, MCL, Greg papers, GB127.C5/8/9/5.
112 Hanson, Children of the mill, p. 119.
113 Sekers, Lady of cotton, p. 178.
114 Kilian, ‘Public and private’, pp. 126–7.
115 Statement to magistrates of Joseph Sefton, 2 Aug. 1806, MCL, Greg papers, GB127.C5/8/9/4.
116 Ibid.
117 Massey, For space, p. 154.
118 Charles Dickens Jr, ‘A Yorkshire colony’, All the Year Round, 21 Jan. 1871, p. 187.
119 Ibid., p. 185.
120 Reynolds, Great paternalist, p. 296.
121 Annie Hall and others, Saltaire: our memories, our history (Leeds, 1984), p. 17.
122 Ibid., p. 20.
123 Ibid., p. 18.
124 Ibid., p. 24.
125 Reynolds, Great paternalist, p. 294.
126 Dickens, ‘Yorkshire colony’, p. 186.
127 ‘Saltaire Club and Institute: distribution of prizes’, Bradford Observer, 1 Nov. 1875, p. 4.
128 ‘Saltaire horticultural and pig show’, Bradford Observer, 27 Aug. 1863, p. 6.
129 ‘Saltaire: Glee and Madrigal Society’, Bradford Observer, 29 May 1869, p. 4.
130 Hall and others, Saltaire, p. 28.
131 Ibid.
132 ‘Park rules – issued in Saltaire’, July 1871, Shipley, Shipley College Learning Resource Centre, Saltaire collection, D3-075a–b.
133 Susie L. Steinbach, Understanding the Victorians: politics, culture and society in nineteenth-century Britain (London, 2012), pp. 23–4.
134 Hall and others, Saltaire, pp. 27–8.
135 Griffin, Liberty’s dawn, pp. 19–20.
136 Ibid., p. 17.
137 Thompson, Making of the English working class, p. 599.
138 Honeyman, ‘Poor Law’, pp. 133–4.
139 Nicola Whyte, ‘Spatial history’, in Sasha Handley, Rohan McWilliam, and Lucy Noakes, eds., New directions in social and cultural history (London, 2018), pp. 233–51, at p. 244.
140 Thompson, Making of the English working class, p. 599.
141 Whyte, ‘Spatial history’, p. 237.
142 Griffin, Liberty’s dawn, p. 19.
143 Carlyle, ‘Chartism’, p. 59.
144 Humphries, Childhood and child labour, p. 208.