No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Scandal and Secrecy in the History of the Nineteenth-Century British Empire
Part of:
Historiographical Reviews
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2021
Abstract
For historians of empire, scandals provide a useful starting point for investigating how the operations of imperial power were contested and reworked in moments of crisis. Yet, existing scholarship on imperial scandal consists mostly of case-studies that do not always reflect on the larger trend of which they are a part. This review draws on six accounts of imperial scandals to produce a general picture of the characteristics and functions of scandals in the historiography of the nineteenth-century British empire. What this comparison suggests is that imperial scandals possessed distinctive stakes and seem, as a result, to have represented periodic ruptures in longer-term patterns of local silence and complicity. Scandals, if used cautiously, can therefore provide evidence to support ongoing discussions about the logic of colonial concealment. At the same time, scandals also remind us that publicity is not a simple cure-all. By including a wider range of actors and non-governmental sources, future studies of scandal might elucidate the political limits of transparency, as well as exploring how imperial subjects negotiated gendered and racialized access to public and political platforms.
- Type
- Historiographical Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.
References
1 For this definition, see Adut, Ari, On scandal: moral disturbances in society, politics, and art (Cambridge, 2008), p. 11Google Scholar.
2 Gluckman, Max, ‘Gossip and scandal’, Current Anthropology, 4 (1963), pp. 307–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a review of the place of scandal within anthropological theory, see Merry, Sally Engle, ‘Rethinking gossip and scandal’, in Black, Donald, ed., Toward a general theory of social control (2 vols., London 1984), I, pp. 271–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Schudson, Michael, ‘Notes on scandal and the Watergate legacy’, American Behavioral Scientist, 47 (2004), pp. 1231–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Clark, Anna, Scandal: the sexual politics of the British constitution (Princeton, NJ, 2006), pp. 1–2Google Scholar.
5 On ‘mediated scandals’, see John B. Thompson, Political scandal: power and visibility in the media age (Cambridge, 2000), p. 31.
6 Turner, Oliver, ‘Global Britain and the narrative of empire’, Political Quarterly, 90 (2019), p. 727CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 John M. MacKenzie, Propaganda and empire: the manipulation of British public opinion, 1880–1960 (Manchester, 1984); Bernard Porter, The absent-minded imperialists: empire, society, and culture in Britain (Oxford, 2004); Catherine Hall and Sonya O. Rose, eds., At home with the empire: metropolitan culture and the imperial world (Cambridge, 2006).
8 Alan Lester, Imperial networks: creating identities in nineteenth-century South Africa and Britain (London, 2001), p. 5. For more on the idea of imperial networks, see Alan Lester, ‘Imperial circuits and networks: geographies of the British empire’, History Compass, 4 (2006), pp. 124–41.
9 Ballantyne, Tony, ‘The changing shape of the modern British empire and its historiography’, Historical Journal, 53 (2010), p. 451Google Scholar.
10 Adut, On scandal, p. 9.
11 Robert Darnton, The great cat massacre and other episodes in French cultural history (New York, NY, 1984). For more on the use of incidents as ‘social texts’, see Maza, Sarah, ‘Stories in history: cultural narratives in recent works in European history’, American Historical Review, 101 (1996), p. 1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Cyril Lemieux, ‘A quoi sert l'analyse des controverses’, Mil neuf cent, 25 (2007), pp. 2–3.
13 Nicholas Dirks, The scandal of empire: India and the creation of imperial Britain (Cambridge, MA, 2006).
14 Ibid., p. 297.
15 Ibid., p. 336.
16 Victor Turner, Dramas, fields, and metaphors: symbolic action in human society (Ithaca, NY, 1974), pp. 37–41.
17 Maza, ‘Stories in history’, p. 1498.
18 Turner, Dramas, fields, and metaphors, p. 43.
19 Dirks, Scandal of empire, p. 30.
20 Ibid.
21 Kirsten McKenzie, Scandal in the colonies: Sydney and Cape Town, 1820–1850 (Melbourne, 2004), p. 45.
22 Ibid., p. 180.
23 Kirsten McKenzie, Imperial underworld: an escaped convict and the transformation of the British colonial order (Cambridge, 2015), pp. 12–15.
24 Ibid., p. 284.
25 Lauren Benton and Lisa Ford, Rage for order: the British empire and the origins of international law, 1800–1850 (Cambridge, MA, 2016).
26 Ibid., p. 14.
27 Ibid., pp. 40–1.
28 Ibid., p. 49.
29 Ibid., p. 60.
30 Ibid., p. 70.
31 Ibid., p. 79.
32 James Epstein, Scandal of colonial rule: power and subversion in the British Atlantic during the age of revolution (Cambridge, 2012). For Benton and Ford's interpretation of the Picton scandal, see Benton and Ford, Rage for order, pp. 28–9.
33 Epstein, Scandal of colonial rule, pp. 267–70, 42.
34 Ibid., p. 4.
35 Emily Manktelow, Gender, power, and sexual abuse in the Pacific: Rev. Simpson's ‘improper liberties’ (London, 2018).
36 Ibid., p. 7.
37 Ibid., p. 33.
38 Ibid., p. 5.
39 Hayden White, Metahistory: the historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe (Baltimore, MD, 1973).
40 Epstein, Scandal of colonial rule, p. 110.
41 Ibid., p. 90.
42 Elizabeth Kolsky, Colonial justice in British India (Cambridge, 2010); Bailkin, Jordanna, ‘The boot and the spleen: when was murder possible in British India?’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 48 (2006), pp. 462–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Martin Wiener, An empire on trial: race, murder, and justice under British rule, 1870–1935 (Cambridge, 2008); Taylor C. Sherman, State violence and punishment in India (Abingdon, 2010).
43 J. A. Sharpe, Judicial punishment in England (London, 1990), p. 47; V. A. C. Gatrell, The hanging tree: execution and the English people, 1770–1868 (Oxford, 1994), p. 328; Michael Ignatieff, A just measure of pain: the penitentiary in the industrial revolution, 1750–1850 (London, 1978), p. 210.
44 Ibid., pp. 148, 152–4.
45 Ibid., p. 172.
46 Clark, Scandal, pp. 4–5.
47 Thompson, Political scandal, p. 245.
48 Ibid., p. 127.
49 McKenzie, Imperial underworld, p. 41.
50 Benton and Ford, Rage for order, p. 48.
51 Ibid., p. 64.
52 Adut, Ari, ‘A theory of scandal: Victorians, homosexuality, and the fall of Oscar Wilde’, American Journal of Sociology, 111 (2005), p. 218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
53 Manktelow, Gender, power, and sexual abuse, p. 168.
54 Ibid.
55 Epstein, Scandal of colonial rule, p. 10.
56 Kathleen Wilson, The island race: Englishness, empire and gender in the eighteenth century (London, 2003), p. 8.
57 Epstein, Scandal of colonial rule, p. 174.
58 McKenzie, Scandal in the colonies, p. 184.
59 McKenzie, Imperial underworld, p. 121.
60 Ibid., p. 70.
61 Epstein, Scandal of colonial rule, p. 121.
62 Ibid., p. 46.
63 Benton and Ford, Rage for order, p. 49.
64 Manktelow, Gender, power, and sexual abuse, p. 23.
65 This account is based on Anderson, David M., ‘Guilty secrets: deceit, denial, and the discovery of Kenya's “migrated archive”’, History Workshop Journal, 80 (2015), pp. 142–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
66 Elkins, Caroline, ‘Looking beyond Mau Mau: archiving violence in the era of decolonization’, American Historical Review, 120 (2015), p. 860CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
67 Banton, Mandy, ‘Destroy? “Migrate”? Conceal? British strategies for the disposal of sensitive records of colonial administrations at independence’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 40 (2012), pp. 321–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rawlings, Gregory, ‘Lost files, forgotten papers and colonial disclosures: the “migrated archives” and the Pacific, 1963–2013’, Journal of Pacific History, 50 (2015), pp. 189–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sato, Shohei, ‘“Operation legacy”: Britain's destruction and concealment of colonial records worldwide’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 45 (2017), pp. 697–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
68 Schwartz, Joan M. and Cook, Terry, ‘Archives, records, and power: the making of modern memory’, Archival Science, 2 (2002), pp. 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
69 Peter Burke, A social history of knowledge from Gutenberg to Diderot (Cambridge, 2000), pp. 116–35.
70 Tony Ballantyne, ‘Archive, discipline, state: power and knowledge in South Asian historiography’, New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 3 (2001), pp. 89–90; Thomas Richards, The imperial archive: knowledge and the fantasy of empire (London, 1993), p. 6.
71 Ann Laura Stoler, Along the archival grain: epistemic anxieties and colonial common sense (Princeton, NJ, 2009), p. 4; H. V. Bowen, The business of empire: the East India Company and imperial Britain, 1756–1833 (Cambridge, 2006), p. 180.
72 Ann Laura Stoler, ‘Colonial archives and the arts of governance’, Archival Science, 2 (2002), pp. 99–100.
73 Stoler, Along the archival grain, p. 3.
74 Ibid., p. 16.
75 Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a theory of practice, trans. Richard Nice (Cambridge, 1987), p. 171; Michael Taussig, Defacement (Stanford, CA, 1999), pp. 5–6.
76 Linstrum, Erik, ‘Facts about atrocity: reporting colonial violence in postwar Britain’, History Workshop Journal, 84 (2017), p. 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
77 For thoughts on how historians might think and write about denial, see Hall, Catherine and Pick, Daniel, ‘Thinking about denial’, History Workshop Journal, 84 (2017), pp. 1–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
78 Bratich, Jack Z., ‘Public secrecy and immanent security’, Cultural Studies, 20 (2006), p. 502CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
79 Birchall, Clare, ‘Secrecy and transparency: the politics of opacity and openness’, Theory, Culture & Society, 28 (2011), p. 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
80 Brian Rappert, How to look good in a war: justifying and challenging state violence (London, 2012), pp. 4–5.
81 David Shenk, Data smog: surviving the information glut (London, 1997).
82 Sissela Bok, Secrets: on the ethics of concealment and revelation (New York, NY, 1982), p. 8.
83 Bratich, Jack Z., ‘Adventures in the public secret sphere: police sovereign networks and communications warfare’, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14 (2014), p. 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
84 Alasdair Roberts, Blacked out: government secrecy in the Information Age (Cambridge, 2006), p. 20.
85 Bowen, The business of empire, pp. 113–14.
86 Epstein, Scandal of colonial rule, p. 271.
87 Lisa Ford, Settler sovereignty: jurisdiction and indigenous people in America and Australia, 1788–1836 (Cambridge, MA, 2010); McKenzie, Imperial underworld, p. 164.
88 Engle Merry, ‘Rethinking gossip and scandal’, p. 285.
89 McKenzie, Imperial underworld, p. 91.
90 Epstein, Scandal of colonial rule, p. 10.
91 Ibid., p. 132.
92 James C. Scott, Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance (New Haven, CT, 1987), p. 25.
93 Manktelow, Gender, power, and sexual abuse, p. 144.
94 Ibid., p. 148.
95 Benton and Ford, Rage for order, p. 29.
96 McKenzie, Scandal of colonial rule, p. 127.
97 Ibid., p. 122.
98 Ibid., pp. 133–4.
99 Manktelow, Gender, power, and sexual abuse, p. 114.
100 Saidiya Hartman, ‘Venus in two acts’, Small Axe, 12 (2008), pp. 2, 4.
101 Manktelow, Gender, power, and sexual abuse, p. 11.
102 Epstein, Scandal of colonial rule, p. 45.
103 Mar, Tracey Banivanua, ‘Shadowing imperial networks: indigenous mobility and Australia's Pacific past’, Australian Historical Studies, 46 (2015), pp. 340–4Google Scholar; Mar, Tracey Baniovanua and Rhook, Nadi, ‘Counter networks of empires: reading unexpected people in unexpected places’, Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History, 19 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, doi:10.1353/cch.2018.0009; Rachel Standfield, ed., Indigenous mobilities: across and beyond the antipodes (Acton, 2018).
104 Epstein, Scandal of colonial rule, p. 156. See also Peter Linebaugh and Marcus Rediker, The many-headed hydra: sailors, slaves, commoners, and the hidden history of the revolutionary Atlantic (Boston, MA, 2000).
105 Tony Ballantyne and Antoinette Burton, eds., Bodies in contact: rethinking colonial encounters in world history (Durham, NC, 2005), p. 5.
106 Zoe Laidlaw, ‘Indigenous interlocutors: networks of imperial protest and humanitarianism in the mid-nineteenth century’, in Jane Carey and Jane Lydon, eds., Indigenous networks: mobility, connections and exchange (New York, NY, 2014), p. 134.