Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T11:51:06.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Individual Psychological Assessment: The Poster Child of Blended Science and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Joy Fisher Hazucha*
Affiliation:
PDI Ninth House
Anuradha Ramesh
Affiliation:
PDI Ninth House
Maynard Goff
Affiliation:
PDI Ninth House
Stu Crandell
Affiliation:
PDI Ninth House
Charlotte Gerstner
Affiliation:
PDI Ninth House
Elaine Sloan
Affiliation:
PDI Ninth House
Jurgen Bank
Affiliation:
PDI Ninth House
Paul Van Katwyk
Affiliation:
PDI Ninth House
*
E-mail: joy.hazucha@pdininthhouse.com, Address: PDI Ninth House, 33 South 6th Street, Suite 4900, Minneapolis, MN 55402

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adverse Impact Analysis of PDI Ninth House Assessments. (2011). Internal technical summary. Minneapolis, MN: Personnel Decisions International.Google Scholar
Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., Ramesh, A., & Goff, M. (2008). A pragmatic view of assessment center exercises and dimensions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 121124. Google Scholar
DeCorte, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Combining predictors to achieve optimal trade-offs between selection quality and adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 13801393. Google Scholar
Dilchert, S., & Ones, D. S. (2009). Assessment center dimensions: Individual differences correlates and meta-analytic incremental validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 254270. Google Scholar
Gaugler, B., Rosenthal, D., Thornton, G., & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493511. Google Scholar
Goff, M., & Ramesh, A. (2011). The validity and value of PDI NH assessments 2011. Internal PDI NH white paper. Minneapolis, MN: PDI Ninth House. Google Scholar
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 1930. Google Scholar
Hausknecht, J., Day, D., & Thomas, S. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639683. Google Scholar
Hermelin, E., Lievens, F., & Robertson, I. T. (2007). The validity of assessment centres for the prediction of supervisory performance ratings: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 405411. Google Scholar
Oswald, F. L., & Hough, L. M. (2008). Personality testing and industrial-organizational psychology: A productive exchange and some future directions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 323332. Google Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., & Kabin, M. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing and higher education. American Psychologist, 56, 302318. Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Chan, D. (1998). Personnel selection: A theoretical approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Security and Exchange Commission. (2009, October). Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14E (CF). Retrieved from http://www.sec.gov/interps/legal/cfslb14e.htm.Google Scholar
Silzer, R. & Jeanneret, R. (2011). Individual psychological assessment: A practice and science in search of common ground. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 270296.Google Scholar
Thornton, G. C., & Gibbons, A. M. (2009). Validity of assessment centers for personnel selection. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 169187. Google Scholar