Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T10:45:19.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why We Study Generations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2015

Yoshie Nakai
Yoshie Nakai*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Eastern Kentucky University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Yoshie Nakai, Department of Psychology, Eastern Kentucky University, 108 Cammack Building, 521 Lancaster Avenue, Richmond, KY 40475. E-mail: yoshie.nakai@eku.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The focal article by Costanza and Finkelstein (2015) shed a light on the current status of generational research at work that often treats generation as an age grouping variable. Although the authors primarily focused on the applicability of research findings to the current workforce, I believe the benefits of studying and understanding generations should not be limited to this purpose. The goal of this commentary is twofold. First, I would like to revisit the concept of generation and the purposes of studying generations at work. Second, given the problems with generational research presented by Costanza and Finkelstein, I would like to propose potential actions that we can take.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 331 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asao, Y. (2007). Outlook on the retirement process of dankai no sedai, or the Japanese baby-boom generation. Japan Labor Review, 4, 121–137.Google Scholar
Costanza, D. P., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2015). Generationally based differences in the workplace: Is there a there there? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8 (4), 308–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In Mannheim, K. (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–321). London, United Kingdom: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Schuman, H., & Scott, J. (1989). Generations and collective memories. American Sociological Review, 54, 359–381.Google Scholar
Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Rethinking “Generation Me”: A study of cohort effects from 1976–2006. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 58–75.Google Scholar