Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T18:22:21.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Educational Programs, Rigid Sharps Containers, and Universal Precautions on Reported Needlestick Injuries in Healthcare Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Calvin C. Linnemann Jr. ,
Constance Cannon ,
Martha DeRonde  and
Bruce Lanphear
Calvin C. Linnemann Jr.*
Affiliation:
Infection Control Department, University of Cincinnati Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio Departments of Internal Medicine, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
Constance Cannon
Affiliation:
Infection Control Department, University of Cincinnati Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
Martha DeRonde
Affiliation:
Medical Center Health Services, University of Cincinnati Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
Bruce Lanphear
Affiliation:
Medical Center Health Services, University of Cincinnati Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio Departments of Internal Medicine, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
*
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Bethesda Avenue, Mail Location 560, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0560
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the effect of infection control programs on reported needlestick injuries in a general hospital.

Design:

Surveillance of all reported needlestick injuries at the University of Cincinnati Hospital was maintained by the infection control department for five years, from 1985 through 1989. Data on individual workers were collected, tabulated on a monthly basis, and reviewed continually to monitor trends in injuries. During this time, the effects of each of three new infection control programs on reported injuries were evaluated sequentially.

Setting:

A 700-bed general hospital that serves as the main teaching hospital of the University of cincinnati.

Participants:

All employees of University Hospital who reported to personnel health for management of needlestick injuries.

Interventions:

In 1986, an educational program to prevent injuries was initiated and continued throughout the surveillance period. In 1987, rigid sharps disposal containers were placed in all hospital rooms. In 1988, universal precautions were introduced with an intensive inservice.

Results:

Surveillance identified 1,602 needlestick injuries (320/year) or 104/1 ,000/ year. After the educational program began, reported injuries increased rather than decreased, and this was attributed to increased reporting. Subsequently, after installation of the new disposal containers, reported injuries returned to the levels seen prior to the educational program, but recapping injuries showed a significant decrease from 63/year to 30, or 20/1,000/year to 10. This decrease was observed in nurses but not in other healthcare workers. After universal precautions were instituted, total injuries increased slightly, but recapping injuries remained at 50% of the levels reported prior to the use of rigid sharps disposal containers.

Conclusions:

The three infection control programs failed to produce a major reduction in reported needlestick injuries, except for a decrease in recapping injuries associated with the placement of rigid sharps disposal containers in all patient rooms. These observations indicate that new approaches are needed to reduce needlestick injuries.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , April 1991 , pp. 214 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McCormick, RD, Maki, DG. Epidemiology of needlestick injuries in hospital personnel. Am J Med. 1981;70:928–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Centers for Disease Control. Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in healthcare settings. MMWR. 1987;36(suppl):S1–S18.Google Scholar
3. Reed, JS, Anderson, AC, Hodges, GR. Needlestick and puncture wounds: definition of the problem. Am I Infect Control. 1980;8:101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Jacobson, JT, Burke, JP, Conti, MT. Injuries of hospital employees from needles and sharp objects. Infect Control. 1983;4:100–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Ruben, FL, Norden, CW, Rockwell, K, Hruska, E. Epidemiology of accidental needle-puncture wounds in hospital workers. Am J Med Sci. 1983;286:26–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Neuberger, JS, Harris, JA, Kundin, D, Bischone, A, Chin, TDY. Incidence of needlestick injuries in hospital personnel: implications for prevention. Am J Infect Control. 1984;12:171–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Jackson, MM, Dechairo, DC, Gardner, DE. Perceptions and beliefs of nursing and medical personnel about needle-handling practices and needlestick injuries. Am J Infect Control. 1986;14:1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Seto, WH, Ching, TY, Chu, YB, Fielding, F. Reduction of the frequency of needle recapping by effective education: a need for conceptual alteration. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990;11:194–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Krasinski, K, LaCouture, R, Holzman, RS. Effect of changing needle disposal systems on needle puncture injuries. Infect Control. 1987;8:59–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Ribner, BS, Landry, MN, Gholson, GL, Linden, LA. Impact of a rigid, puncture resistant container system upon needlestick injuries. Infect Control. 1987;8:63–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Edmond, M, Khakoo, R, McTaggart, B, Solomon, R. Effect of bedside needle disposal units on needle recapping frequency and needlestick injury. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988;9:114–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Hamory, BH. Underreporting of needlestick injuries in a university hospital. Am J Infect Control. 1983;11:174–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Jagger, J, Hunt, EH, Pearson, RD. Recapping used needles: is it worse than the alternative? J Infect Dis. 1990;162:784–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Jagger, J, Pearson, RD. A view from the cutting edge. Infect Control. 1987;8:51–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Jagger, J, Hunt, EH. Brand-Elenaggar, J, Pearson, RD. Rates of needlestick injury caused by various devices in a university hospital. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Goldwater, PN, Law, R, Nixon, AD, Officer, JA, Cleland, JE Impact of a recapping device on venepuncture-related needlestick injury. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:21–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed