Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T17:06:27.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nosocomial Acquisition of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus During an Outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Susan M. Poutanen
Affiliation:
Toronto Medical Laboratories andMount Sinai Hospital, Ontario Canada University of Toronto, Ontario Canada
Mary Vearncombe
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Ontario Canada Sunnybrook andWomen's College Health Sciences Centre, Ontario Canada
Allison J. McGeer
Affiliation:
Toronto Medical Laboratories andMount Sinai Hospital, Ontario Canada University of Toronto, Ontario Canada
Michael Gardam
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Ontario Canada University Health Network, Ontario Canada
Grant Large
Affiliation:
Scarborough Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Andrew E. Simor*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Ontario Canada Sunnybrook andWomen's College Health Sciences Centre, Ontario Canada
*
Department of Microbiology, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, B121-2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5.andrew.simor@sw.ca

Abstract

Objective:

The four hospitals assessed in this study use active surveillance cultures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and contact precautions for MRSA-positive patients as part of routine infection control practices. The objective of this study was to determine whether nosocomial acquisition of MRSA decreased in these hospitals during an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) when barrier precautions were routinely used for all patients.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

Three tertiary-care hospitals (a 1,100-bed hospital; a 500-bed hospital; and an 823-bed hospital) and a 430-bed community hospital, each located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Patients:

All admitted patients were included.

Results:

The nosocomial rate of MRSA in all four hospitals combined during the SARS outbreak (3.7 per 10,000 patient-days) was not significantly different from that before (4.7 per 10,000 patient-days) or after (3.4 per 10,000 patient-days) the outbreak (P = .30 and P = .76, respectively). The nosocomial rate of MRSA after the outbreak was significantly lower than that before the outbreak (P = .003). Inappropriate reuse of gloves and gowns and failure to wash hands between patients on non-SARS wards were observed during the outbreak. Increased attention was paid to infection control education following the outbreak.

Conclusions:

Inappropriate reuse of gloves and gowns and failure to wash hands between patients may have contributed to transmission of MRSA during the SARS outbreak. Attention should be paid to training healthcare workers regarding the appropriate use of precautions as a means to protect themselves and patients.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Update, August 25, 2003. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2003. Available at www.health.gov.on.ca/english/public/updates/archives/hu_03/sars_stats/stat_082503.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2004.Google Scholar
2.Ofner, M, Lem, M, Sarwal, S, et al.Cluster of severe acute respiratory Syndrome cases among protected healthcare workers: Toronto, Canada, April 2003. MMWR 2003;52:433436.Google Scholar
3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection Control in Healthcare, Home, and Community Settings. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2004. Available at www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/guidance/I/index.htm. Accessed April 12, 2004.Google Scholar
4.Health Canada. SARS Outbreak Period: Infection Control Precautions. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Health Canada; 2003. Available at www.hc-sc.gc.ca/pphb-dgspsp/sars-sras/sars.html#control. Accessed April 12, 2004.Google Scholar
5.Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Notices and Directives. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2003. Available at www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/pubhealth/sars/sars_mn.html#l. Accessed April 12, 2004.Google Scholar
6.Arnold, MS, Dempsey, JM, Fishman, M, McAuley, PJ, Tibert, C, Vallande, NC. The best hospital practices for controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: on the cutting edge. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:6976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Muto, CA, Jernigan, JA, Ostrowsky, BE, et al.SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:362386.Google Scholar
8.Scales, D, Green, K, Chan, A, et al.Illness in intensive care staff after brief exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:12051210.Google Scholar
9.Patterson, JE, Vecchio, J, Pantelick, EL, et al.Association of contaminated gloves with transmission of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus var. anitra-tus in an intensive care unit. Am J Med 1991;91:479483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Manian, FA, Meyer, L, Jenne, J. Clostridium difficile contamination of blood pressure cuffs: a call for a closer look at gloving practices in the era of universal precautions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996; 17:180182.Google Scholar
11.Yap, FHY, Gomersall, CD, Fung, KSC, et al.Increase in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition rate and change in pathogen pattern associated with an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:511516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed