Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:02:38.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preventing unnecessary urine cultures at a Veteran’s affairs healthcare system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2024

Chad D. Nix
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
William B. Messer
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA Program in Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University (OHSU-PSU) School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Amy Boda
Affiliation:
Division of Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
Kimberly T. MacKay
Affiliation:
Division of Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA Department of Pharmacy, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
Jennifer Holmquist
Affiliation:
Division of Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
La’Tonzia L. Adams
Affiliation:
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
Eric Gladwin
Affiliation:
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
Christopher D. Pfeiffer*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA Division of Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
*
Corresponding author: Christopher D. Pfeiffer; Email: Christopher.Pfeiffer2@va.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Research Brief
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Introduction

An overarching goal of diagnostic stewardship is to improve the value of care delivery while avoiding patient harm. Reference Fabre, Davis and Diekema1 One strategy to decrease unnecessary urine cultures (UCx) is to implement conditional urine reflex culture (CURCx) for routine urinary tract infection (UTI) diagnosis. Reference Morgan, Malani and Diekema2 Currently no single accepted set of criteria for CURCx exists, and recent surveys indicate significant heterogeneity in its use. Reference Ling, Seidelman and Dodds-Ashley3,Reference Sullivan, Morgan and Leekha4 CURCx protocols have previously demonstrated success, primarily in inpatient settings, without evidence of harm. Reference Claeys, Zhan and Pineles5,Reference Lynch, Appleby-Sigler and Bork6

In this report, we sought to quantify the impact of a quality improvement project aimed at reducing unnecessary urine testing across the care spectrum at our center using an education intervention followed by electronic medical record (EMR) order menu revisions including a CURCx option; we hypothesized that we would only attain decreased urine testing to the latter. We explored whether these interventions impacted catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) and ID e-Consult rates. This study was cleared by the VA Portland Institutional Review Board (#3301).

Methods

Setting

The VA Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS) serves ∼95,000 Veterans and is comprised of an acute care hospital with 160 licensed beds, a 76-bed community living center (CLC) providing inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing care, and 10 outpatient clinics.

Workgroup

We convened a multidisciplinary workgroup led by infection prevention which included stakeholders from infectious diseases (IDs), antibiotic stewardship, microbiology laboratory, and nephrology. In learning of insufficiently descriptive and haphazardly arranged EMR order menus in addition to that positive urinalyses (UAs) were always undergoing automatic reflex to UCx, the workgroup determined to implement an educational campaign coupled with revised EMR order menus and testing options; the interventions were separated primarily due to logistical challenges.

Interventions

Education (4/2018)

We disseminated a newly created VAPORHCS UTI testing algorithm, adapted from others’ published work. Reference Naik, Skelton, Amspoker, Glasgow and Trautner7 We distributed the algorithm to clinical staff via email, presented the project and algorithm to all clinicians at a Medical Staff Meeting, and placed the document on internal Sharepoint (Supplemental Figure 1).

EMR/Testing revisions (9/2019)

We revised the inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department (ED) urine section(s) of the order menus (Supplemental Figures 24). Revisions included improved clarity and organization, addition of UA-only and CURCx test options, and placement of an embedded link to the UTI algorithm on Sharepoint. The new CURCx criteria required a positive nitrite, leukocyte esterase, or ≥10 WBC/hpf to reflex to culture. These changes were also broadly communicated to clinicians.

Data analyses

We performed a retrospective, interrupted time-series analysis from 1/2017 to 5/2021 with two intervention time points (4/2018, 9/2019). We analyzed UCx results (beginning 1/2017) and the counts of all pertinent urine tests (beginning 6/2017) pre-, mid-, and postintervention and stratified by location: inpatient (including acute care and CLC), ED, and outpatient. Because growth of any amount could prompt antibiotic use, a positive UCx was defined as a culture that yielded any bacterial growth. We counted the number of ID e-Consults for bacteriuria and UTI and obtained the quarterly institutional CAUTI counts and rate. The intervention months (and quarters for CAUTI) were omitted. After initial data review, to account for the most obvious impact of the COVID-19 pandemic when clinical operations were curtailed, data from 3/2020–5/2020 were additionally excluded. One-way ANOVA with Tukey–Kramer honest significant difference (HSD) ordered differences was used to compare the three time periods for all variables using GraphPad Prism version 9.0 (San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

The average number of urine tests ordered per month decreased by 23% from pre- to postintervention (P < .001) and 17% from mid- to postintervention (P < .001) (see Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 5). Of 39,770 postintervention urine tests ordered, 24,558 (62%) were CURCx or direct UCx while 15,212 (38%) were UA-only. Postintervention, UA-only orders comprised 31% of inpatient, 13% of ED, and 41% of outpatient total urine testing orders.

Table 1. Monthly urine tests (cumulative), urine cultures, and percent positivity compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey–Kramer HSD ordered differences

a July 2017 to March 2018 (urine tests) and January 2017 to March 2018 (urine cultures and percent positivity), preintervention.

b May 2019 to August 2020, mid-intervention (ie, between interventions; March, April, and May 2020 excluded from analysis).

c October 2020 to May 2021, postintervention.

The monthly average number of UCx performed decreased by 33% from pre- to postintervention (P < .0001) and 28% mid- to postintervention (P < .0001). Notably, unlike the inpatient and outpatient settings, UCx orders increased 34% in the ED between the pre- to postintervention time periods (P = .01). Also, % positivity of UCx increased from pre- and mid-intervention (36%) to postintervention (47%; P < .0001) (see Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 6). The CAUTI rate and number of ID e-Consults were not statistically impacted (see Supplementary Tables 3 and 4).

Discussion

Our study was unique in that we were able to assess the impact of urine testing interventions to improve diagnostic stewardship across the care spectrum in a healthcare system. We found a clinically important 23% decrease in cumulative monthly urine tests and 33% decrease in the number of UCxs performed between pre- and postintervention periods. These changes were primarily driven by the bundled EMR/testing revisions, as nicely demonstrated by the UA-only option comprising 38% of postintervention urine test orders. In the stratified analyses, the decrease of monthly UCx was driven both by the inpatient (68% decrease) and outpatient settings (40% decrease); the reasons behind the unexpected 34% increase in the ED is a topic demanding further exploration. Additionally, while no identifiable change in CAUTI rate or ID e-Consults were seen, the absolute numbers of these events were small. Limitations of this study include its single-center, descriptive nature and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic beyond the initial shut-down on ordering patterns including the paradigm shift to virtual care. In summary, this study demonstrated a clinically relevant and statistically significant impact of a multidisciplinary diagnostic stewardship project to reduce unnecessary urine tests at a large VA healthcare system.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.44.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tonya Dirkx, MD, Nephrology, VAPORHCS, for assistance and advice in updating the UTI order menus.

Financial support

None reported.

Competing interests

Dr. Pfeiffer reports grants from Pfizer and Department of Defense/MedPace, outside the submitted work.

References

Fabre, V, Davis, A, Diekema, DJ, et al. Principles of diagnostic stewardship: A practical guide from the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Diagnostic Stewardship Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023;44:178185. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, DJ, Malani, P, Diekema, DJ. Diagnostic Stewardship-Leveraging the Laboratory to Improve Antimicrobial Use. JAMA 2017;318:607608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8531 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ling, D, Seidelman, J, Dodds-Ashley, E, et al. Navigating reflex urine culture practices in community hospitals: Need for a validated approach. Am J Infect Control 2020;48:15491551. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.218 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, KV, Morgan, DJ, Leekha, S. Use of diagnostic stewardship practices to improve urine culturing among SHEA Research Network hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:228231. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.325 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claeys, KC, Zhan, M, Pineles, L, et al. Conditional reflex to urine culture: Evaluation of a diagnostic stewardship intervention within the Veterans’ Affairs and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Practice-Based Research Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;42:176181. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.400 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, CS, Appleby-Sigler, A, Bork, JT, et al. Effect of urine reflex culturing on rates of cultures and infections in acute and long-term care. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020;9:96. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00762-1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naik, AD, Skelton, F, Amspoker, AB, Glasgow, RA, Trautner, BW. A fast and frugal algorithm to strengthen diagnosis and treatment decisions for catheter-associated bacteriuria. PLoS One 2017;12:e0174415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174415 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Monthly urine tests (cumulative), urine cultures, and percent positivity compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey–Kramer HSD ordered differences

Supplementary material: File

Nix et al. supplementary material

Nix et al. supplementary material
Download Nix et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.4 MB