Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-04T20:16:02.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavating the field of heritage law: support, renewal, and iconoclasm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2023

Lucas Lixinski Open the ORCID record for Lucas Lixinski [Opens in a new window]
Lucas Lixinski*
Affiliation:
Professor, Faculty of Law and Justice, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
*
Email: l.lixinski@unsw.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article maps the field of cultural heritage law, arguing for the need for its renewal, even if at the cost of some iconoclasm of notions we hold dear in our conceptual thinking about heritage. The article pursues this thesis by excavating a conceptual archaeology (broadly in the Foucauldian sense) of four key assumptions or conceptual pillars of cultural heritage law, which are the assumption of inherent value of cultural heritage; the pillar of authenticity; the assumption that human rights can work as a panacea for the renewal of the field; and the pillar of expertise. The archaeology of these ideas shows how much of what we take for granted in cultural heritage law is no longer fit for purpose, and the article shows those stakes by contrasting the work of these pillars and assumptions against some of the key challenges to the field: interdisciplinarity; the Anthropocene; enforcement; and the growing use of heritage as an ideological target in armed conflicts.

Keywords

cultural heritage lawauthenticitydiscourse analysisexpertiseAnthropocene
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , First View , pp. 1 - 16
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alatalu, Riin. 2021. “Dignity of the Heritage and the Heritage Communities.” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 11, no. 2: 146–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2019-0064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Giulio. 2020. “Cultural Heritage and Disasters.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, edited by Francioni, F. and Vrdoljak, A. F., 145–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198859871.003.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. (1935) 2010. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Scottsdale, AZ: Prism Key Press.Google Scholar
Bortolotto, Chiara. 2021. “Commercialization without Over-Commercialization: Normative Conundrums across Heritage Rationalities.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 27, no. 9: 857–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1858441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas. 2006. “The Evolving International Hu man Rights System.” American Journal of International Law 100, no. 4: 783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Christina, and Rössler, Mechtild. 2016. Many Voices, One Vision: The Early Years of the World Heritage Convention. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casaly, Paige. 2016. “Al Mahdi before the ICC: Cultural Property and World Heritage in International Criminal Law.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 14, no. 5: 1199–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 2008. The Human Dimension of International Law: Selected Papers of Antonio Cassese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Censer, Jack R., and Hunt, Lynn. 2001. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: Exploring the French Revolution. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Chaomei. 2003. Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0051-5_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristaudo, Wayne. 2012. Religion, Redemption and Revolution: The New Speech Thinking Revolution of Franz Rozenzweig and Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442695320-011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, Harriet, and Smeets, Rieks. 2013. “Authenticity, Value and Community Involvement in Heritage Management under the World Heritage and Intangible Heritage Conventions.” Heritage & Society 6, no. 2: 129–43. https://doi.org/ 10.1179/2159032X13Z.0000000009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, David. 2019. “The Poverty of Pessimism.” In Imperatives for Legal Education Research: Then, Now and Tomorrow, edited by Golder, B., Nehme, M, Steel, A and Vines, P, 49–73. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donders, Yvonne. 2020. “Cultural Heritage and Human Rights.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, edited by Francioni, F. and Vrdoljak, A. F., 379–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198859871.003.0017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doppelhofer, Christoph. 2016. “Will Palmyra Rise Again? War Crimes against Cultural Heritage and Post-war Reconstruction.” https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/CulturalRights/DestructionHeritage/NGOS/Ch.Doppelhofer.pdf.Google Scholar
Engle, Karen. 2001. “From Skepticism to Embrace: Human Rights and the American Anthropological Association from 1947–1999.” Human Rights Quarterly 23, no. 3: 536–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, Karen. 2010. The Elusive Promise of Indigenous Development. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les mots et les choses: une archeologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Francioni, Francesco. 2011. “The Human Dimension of International Cultural Heritage Law: An Introduction.” European Journal of International Law 22, no. 1: 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francioni, Francesco, and Lixinski, Lucas. 2017. “Opening the Toolbox of International Human Rights Law in the Safeguarding of Cultural Heritage.” In Heritage, Culture and Rights: Challenging Legal Discourses, edited by Durbach, A. and Lixinski, L., 11–34. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Francis-Lindsay, Janice. 2009. “The Intrinsic Value of Cultural Heritage and Its Relationship to Sustainable Tourism Development: The Contrasting Experiences of Jamaica and Japan.” Caribbean Quarterly 55, no. 2: 151–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00086495.2009.11829763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Beatriz, and Lixinski, Lucas. 2020. “Beyond Culture: Reimagining the Adjudication of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in International Law.” Intercultural Human Rights Law Review 15, no. 3: 127–69.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Beatrice. 2005. “Benjamin or Heidegger: Aesthetics and Politics in an Age of Technology.” In Walter Benjamin and Art, edited by Benjamin, Andrew, 73–92. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Harrison, Rodney. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harrison, Rodney, and Sterling, Colin, eds. 2020. Deterritorializing the Future: Heritage in, of and after the Anthropocene. London: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Hausler, Kristin. 2015. “Culture under Attack: The Destruction of Cultural Heritage by Non-State Armed Groups.” Santander Art and Culture Law Review 1, no. 2: 117–46.Google Scholar
Hicks, Dan. 2020. The British Museums: The Benin Bronzes, Colonial Violence and Cultural Restitution. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Immonen, Visa. 2012. “Heritageisation as a Material Process: The Bishop’s Crosier of Turku Cathedral, Finland.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 18, no. 2: 144–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.606821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Richard B. 2022. “Cultural Property Protection in the Ukraine Conflict.” Articles of War. <volume and page range or other publication information?> https://lieber.westpoint.edu/cultural-property-protection-ukraine-conflict/.+https://lieber.westpoint.edu/cultural-property-protection-ukraine-conflict/.>Google Scholar
Jenkins, Tiffany. 2018. Keeping Their Marbles: How the Treasures of the Past Ended Up in Museums – And Why They Should Stay There. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kapur, Ratna. 2017. “The (Im)possibility of Queering International Human Rights Law.” In Queering International Law, edited by Otto, D., 131–47. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David. 2016. A World of Struggle: How Power, Law and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Andrew. 2011. World Trade Law after Neoliberalism: Reimagining the Global Economic Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Stephen. 2011. Humanism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199553648.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenzerini, Federico. 2020. “Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, edited by Francioni, F. and Vrdoljak, A. F., 75–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198859871.003.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Ben. 2019. “‘Salvator Mundi’.” Times Literary Supplement 6078: 6–7.Google Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas. 2013. “International Cultural Heritage Regimes, International Law, and the Politics of Expertise.” International Journal of Cultural Property 20, no. 4: 407–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739113000210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas. 2015.” Between Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy: The Troubled Relationships between Heritage Studies and Heritage Law.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21, no. 3: 203–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2014.922113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas. 2019. International Heritage Law for Communities: Exclusion and Re-Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas. 2021. Legalized Identities: Cultural Heritage Law and the Shaping of Transitional Justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas. 2022. “Against Authenticity.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 28, no. 11–12: 1213–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2022.2134177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas, and Williams, Sarah. Forthcoming. “Cultural Heritage and the Conservation and Insecurity Paradigms: International Law in the Pursuit of Social Cohesion.” In Heritage in War and Peace: Legal and Political Perspectives for Future Protection, edited by Bonaviri, G. M. and Sadowski, M. M.. Springer (cited with permission).Google Scholar
Longman, Chia, and Bradley, Tamsin, eds. 2016. Interrogating Harmful Cultural Practices: Gender, Culture and Coercion. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenthal, David. 1998. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John H. 1985. “Thinking About the Elgin Marbles.” Michigan Law Review 83, no. 8: 1881–1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John H. 1992. “Counterfeit Art.” International Journal of Cultural Property 1, no. 127–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739192000055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Benjamin. 2014. “In Defence of Oblivion: The Case of Dunwich, Suffolk.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 20, no. 2: 196–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.746718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutua, Makau. 2001. “Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights.” Harvard International Law Journal 42, no. 1: 201–45.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Lynn H. 1995. The Rape of Europa: The Fate of Europe’s Treasures in the Third Reich and the Second World War. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Nickel, James W. 1999. “Intrinsic Value and Cultural Preservation.” Arizona State Law Journal 31, no. 2: 355–62.Google Scholar
Olsen, Bjørnar J., and Vinogradova, Svetlana. 2020. “(In)significantly Soviet: The Heritage of Teriberka.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 26, no. 9: 901–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1620831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichardt, Rolf, and Kohle, Hubertus. 2008. Visualizing the Revolution: Politics and the Pictorial Arts in Late Eighteenth-century France. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Robertson, Geoffrey. 2019. Who Owns History?: Elgin’s Loot and the Case for Returning Plundered Treasure. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
Sax, Joseph L. 1990. “Heritage Preservation as a Public Duty: The Abbé Grégoire and the Origins of an Idea.” Michigan Law Review 88, no. 5: 1142–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheffi, Na’ama. 2019. “Past Continuous: Archaeological Representations on Israeli Banknotes and Coins.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 25, no. 8: 808–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1544919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitra, Sebastian M. 2020. “Civilisation, Protection, Restitution: A Critical History of International Cultural Heritage Law in the 19th and 20th Century.” Journal of the History of International Law 22, no. 2–3: 329–54. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718050-12340154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauder, Jack. 1974. “The ‘Relevance’ of Anthropology to Colonialism and Imperialism.” Race 16, no. 1: 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troper, Michel. 1999. “French Secularism, or Laïcité.” Cardozo Law Review 21, no. 4: 1267–84.Google Scholar
Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa. 2006. International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wierczyńska, Karolina, and Jakubowski, Andrzej. 2020. “The Al Mahdi Case from Punishing Perpetrators to Repairing Cultural Heritage Harm.” In Intersections in International Cultural Heritage Law, edited by Carstens, A. and Varner, E., 133–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846291.003.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisner, David. 2000. “Painters and Public Patronage in the First French Republic: The Ministry of the Interior and the Art of the French Revolution.” In The French Experience from Republic to Monarchy, 1792–1824, edited by Cross, M. F. and Williams, D., 88–103. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar