Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T11:13:37.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Winning Title to Land but Not to Its Past: The Toledo Maya and Sites of pre-Hispanic Heritage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Shoshaunna Parks
Shoshaunna Parks
Affiliation:
Research Laboratories of Archaeology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Email: shoshiparks@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The struggle for indigenous rights to pre-Hispanic cultural heritage parallels the struggle for indigenous land rights in Belize. By Belizean law, material objects and sites of activity older than 100 years in age are the property of the state. Similarly, land inhabited by indigenous communities in southern Belize is held in trust by the government. In 2007 the community of Santa Cruz in southern Belize won customary land tenure over their lands for the first time from the Belizean government. This change in land ownership presents new challenges to the definition of ownership of ancient places in Maya territory. In particular, the transfer of land rights to the community has potential implications for the ownership and management of the local pre-Hispanic site of Uxbenká that may ultimately serve as a paradigm for the future relationship between Maya peoples and ancestral remains throughout the nation.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 111 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anaya, S. James. “Reparations for Neglect of Indigenous Land Rights at the Intersection of Domestic and International Law—The Maya Cases in the Supreme Court of Belize.” In Reparations for Indigenous People: International and Comparative Perspectives, edited by Lenzerini, Federico, 567–604. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Arias, Arturo. “The Maya Movement, Postcolonialism and Cultural Agency.” Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies 15, no. 2 (2006): 251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atalay, Sonya. “Indigenous Archaeology as Decolonizing Practice.” American Indian Quarterly 30, no. 3-4 (2006): 280–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atalay, Sonya. “Multivocality and Indigenous Archaeologies.” In Evaluating Multiple Narratives: Beyond Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist Archaeologies, edited by Habu, Junko, Fawcett, Clare, and Matsunaga, John M., 29–44. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolland, Nigel O.Formation of a Colonial Society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Fischer, Edward F.Cultural Logics and Global Economies: Maya Identity in Thought and Practice. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Garrett, Wilbur E. “La Ruta Maya.” National Geographic 176, no. 4 (1989): 424–79.Google Scholar
Gilgan, Elizabeth. “Looting and the Market for Maya Objects: A Belizean Perspective.” In Trade in Illicit Antiquities: The Destruction of the World's Archaeological Heritage, edited by Brodie, Neil., Doole, J., and Renfrew, Colin., 73–88. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs for Archaeological Research, 2001.Google Scholar
Grandia, Liza. k“Unsettling: Land Dispossession and Enduring Inequity for the Q'eqchi' Maya in the Guatemalan and Belizean Frontier Colonization Process.” PhD diss., Department of Anthropology, University of California-Berkeley, 2006.Google Scholar
Grandia, Liza. “Milpa Matters: Maya Communities of Toledo v. Government of Belize.” In Waging War, Making Peace: Reparations and Human Rights, edited by Johnston, Barbara Rose and Slyomovics, Susan, 153–82. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Harrison, Faye V., ed. Decolonizing Anthropology: Moving Further Toward an Anthropology for Liberation, 1–15. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association, 1991.Google Scholar
Houston, Stephen D., Robertson, John, and Stuart, David. 2000. The Language of Classic Maya Inscriptions. Current Anthropology 41:321–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Grant D.The Conquest of the Last Maya Kingdom. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Rosemary A. “Archaeology and Nation Building: A View from Central America.” In The Politics of Archaeology and Identity in a Global Context, edited by Kane, Susan, 79–100. Boston, MA: Colloquia and Conference Papers 7, Archaeological Institute of America, 2003.Google Scholar
Matsuda, David. “The Ethics of Archaeology, Subsistence Digging, and Artifact Looting in Latin America.” International Journal of Cultural Property 7, no. 1 (1998): 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, Laurie Kroshus. “History, Culture, and Place-Making: ‘Native’ Status and Maya Identity in Belize.” Journal of Latin American Anthropology 4, no. 1 (1998): 134–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, June C.Mayan Visions: The Quest for Autonomy in an Age of Globalization. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Nicholas, George, and Andrews, Thomas. “Indigenous Archaeology in a Post-Modern World.” In At A Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada, edited by Nicholas, George and Andrews, Thomas, 1–18. Burnaby: SFU Archaeology Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Parks, Shoshaunna. “Archaeological Ethics and the Struggle for Community Legitimacy in the Maya Archaeoscape.” PhD diss., Department of Archaeology, Boston University, 2009.Google Scholar
Parks, Shoshaunna, McAnany, Patricia A., and Murata, Satoru. “The Conservation of Maya Cultural Heritage: Searching for Solutions in a Troubled Region.” Journal of Field Archaeology 31, no. 4 (2006): 425–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Peter R. “A Human Right to a Cultural Heritage: African Expressions and Configurations.” In the East African Journal of Peace and Human Rights, vol. 2, no. 1, 1995, pp. 41–52.Google Scholar
Silverman, Helaine, and Ruggles, D. Fairchild, eds. Cultural Heritage and Human Rights. New York: Springer, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Claire, and Jackson, Gary. “Decolonizing Indigenous Archaeology: Developments from Down Under.” American Indian Quarterly 30, no. 3-4 (2006): 311–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Stone, Michael. “La Politica Cultura de la Identidad Maya en Belice.” Mesoamerica 29 (1995): 167–214.Google Scholar
Stone, Michael. “Becoming Belizean: Maya Identity and the Politics of a Nation.” The Maya Diaspora: Guatemalan Roots, New American Lives, edited by Loucky, James and Moors, Marilyn M., 119–40. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Swidler, Nina, Dongoske, Kurt E., Anyon, Roger, and Downer, Alan S., eds. Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Toledo Maya Cultural Council and Toledo Alcade Association. Maya Atlas: The Struggle to Preserve Maya Land in Southern Belize. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books, 1997.Google Scholar
Wainwright, Joel. Decolonizing Development: Colonial Power and the Maya. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilk, Richard R. “The Kekchi and the Settlement of Toledo District.” Belizean Studies 15, no. 3 (1987): 33–50.Google Scholar
Wilk, Richard R.Household Ecology: Economic Change and Domestic Life Among the Kekchi Maya of Belize. Arizona Studies in Human Ecology. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 1991.Google Scholar