Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T06:27:36.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing Health Benefit from Hospitalization: Agreement Between Expert Panels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Bjørn O. Eriksen
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Tromsø
Sven M. Almdahl
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Tromsø
Anne Hensrud
Affiliation:
Kommunelegekontoret i Bardu
Steinar Jæger
Affiliation:
Nordland Central Hospital
Ivar S. Kristiansen
Affiliation:
University of Tromsø
Fred A. Mürer
Affiliation:
Rana Hospital
Erik Nord
Affiliation:
National Institute of Public Health, Norway
Jan Fr. Pape
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Tromsø
Reidar Robertsen
Affiliation:
Åsgård Psychiatric Hospital
Glen Thorsen
Affiliation:
Harstad sykehus

Abstract

Agreement between two expert panels in assessing gain in life expectancy and quality of life from unselected stays in a department of internal medicine was investigated. Weighted kappa statistics of 0.45 for gain in life expectancy and 0.63 for gain in quality of life were found.

Type
General Essays
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W.Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1975.Google Scholar
2.Buckingham, K.A note on HYE (healthy years equivalent). Journal of Health Economics 1993, 11, 301–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cohen, J.Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 213–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Culyer, A. J., & Wagstaff, A.QALYs versus HYEs. Journal of Health Economics, 1993, 11, 311–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Fleiss, J. L.Statistical methods of rates and proportions, 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1981.Google Scholar
6.Gafni, A., Birch, S., & Mehrez, A.Economics, health and health economics: HYEs versus QALYs. Journal of Health Economics, 11, 325–39.Google Scholar
7.Goldman, R. L.The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. JAMA, 1992, 267, 958–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Johannesson, M., Pliskin, J. S., & Weinstein, M. C.Are healthy-years equivalents an improvement over quality-adjusted life years? Medical Decision Making, 1993, 13, 281–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Koran, L. M.The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments. New England Journal of Medicine, 1975, 293, 642–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Mehrez, A., & Gafni, A.The healthy-years equivalents: How to measure them using the standard gamble approach. Medical Decision Making, 1991, 11, 140–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Nord, E.The QALY: A measure of social value rather than individual utility? Health Economics, 1994, 3, 8993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Pliskin, J. S., Shepard, D. S., & Weinstein, M. C.Utility functions for life years and health status. Operations Research, 1980, 28, 206–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Richardson, J.Cost utility analysis: What should be measured —Utility, value, or health equivalents? Social Science and Medicine, 1994, 39, 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Tanner, M. A., & Young, M. A.Modeling agreement among raters. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1985, 80, 175–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Torrance, G. W.Health status index models: A unified mathematical view. Management Science, 1976, 22, 9901001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Torrance, G. W.Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 1986, 5, 130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed