Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:51:01.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparing a clinician-assisted and app-supported behavioral activation intervention to promote brain health and well-being in frontline care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2020

Keri-Leigh Cassidy*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
Michael Vallis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
David Conn
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
Ariane S. Massie
Affiliation:
Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health, Toronto, Canada School of Kinesiology & Health Science, York University, Toronto, Canada
Claire Checkland
Affiliation:
Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
Daria Parsons
Affiliation:
Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
Julie Spence Mitchell
Affiliation:
Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
Kiran Rabheru
Affiliation:
Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health, Toronto, Canada Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Keri-Leigh Cassidy, Geriatric Psychiatry Department, 6th floor Abbie Lane Building, 5909 Veterans’ Memorial Lane, Halifax, Nova ScotiaB3H 2E2, Canada. Phone: +1 902-472-2927; Fax: +1 902-473-5713. Email: Keri-Leigh.Cassidy@nshealth.ca.

Abstract

Background:

Positive psychiatry offers an unique approach to promote brain health and well-being in aging populations. Minimal interventions through behavioral activation to promote wellness are increasingly available using self-guided apps, yet little is known about the effectiveness of app technology or the difference between clinician-supported behavioral activation versus self-guided app methodologies.

Objectives:

Investigate the difference in users and outcomes between two methods of the Fountain of Health (FoH) positive psychiatry intervention for behavioral activation to promote brain health and well-being: (1) clinician-assisted and (2) independent app use for behavioral self-management.

Design and setting:

As part of a larger knowledge translation intervention in positive psychiatry, two specific methods of a behavioral activation intervention were retrospectively compared.

Participants:

Two subsets of patients were compared; 254 clinician-assisted patients; 333 independent app users.

Intervention:

A minimal positive psychiatry intervention in frontline care using the FoH health and behavior change clinical tools

Measurements:

Main outcomes were changes in psychological (health and resilience, well-being scores) and behavioral indices (goal attainment, items of goal SMART-ness). User profiles (age, sex and completion rates) were also compared.

Results:

Clinician-assisted patients were more likely to be male, older, and have lower health and resilience scores at baseline. Clinician-assisted patients had notably higher completion rates (99.2% vs. 10.8%). Psychological outcomes (improved health and resilience, and well-being) were similar regardless of intervention method for those who completed the intervention. Behavioral outcomes revealed clinician-assisted patients set goals that better adhered to key goal-setting items.

Conclusions:

Clinician–patient relationships appear to be an important factor for intervention completion and behavioral outcomes, while further exploration of best practices for intervention completion using health apps in clinical practice is needed. A preliminary goal-setting methodology for effective behavioral activation, to promote brain health and wellness, is given.

Type
Original Research Article
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carroll, J. K., Moorhead, A., Bond, R., Leblanc, W. G., Petrella, R. J. and Fiscella, K. (2017). Who uses mobile phone health apps and does use matter? A secondary data analytic approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19, 113. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, K. -L. and Cassidy, B. (2019). Advances in psychiatry. In: K. Fountoulakis and A. Javed. (Eds.), Positive Psychiatry: Neuroscience and Brain Health and Resilience (pp. 329–345). New York: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Delgado, D. A. et al. (2018). Validation of digital visual analog scale pain scoring with a traditional paper-based visual analog scale in adults. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 3, e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088 Google Scholar
Depp, C. A. and Jeste, D. V. (2006). Definitions and predictors of successful aging: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 620. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000192501.03069.bc CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70, 3536.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, S. (2010). Rising tide: the impact of dementia on Canadian society. Alzheimer Society of Canada Report No.: 978-0-9733522-2-1 [Online]. Available at: https://alzheimer.ca/sites/default/files/files/national/advocacy/asc_rising_tide_full_report_e.pdf; last accessed 21 January 2019Google Scholar
Gough, A., Cassidy, B., Rabheru, K., Conn, D., Canales, D. D. and Cassidy, K.-L. (2018). The fountain of health: effective health promotion knowledge transfer in individual primary care and group community-based formats. International Psychogeriatrics, 31, 173180. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000480 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J., Hibbard, J. H., Alvarez, C. and Overton, V. (2016). Supporting patient behavior change: approaches used by primary care clinicians whose patients have an increase in activation levels. The Annals of Family Medicine, 14, 148154. doi: 10.1370/afm.1904 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeste, D. V. and Palmer, B. W. (Eds.) (2015). Positive Psychiatry: A Clinical Handbook. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyworth, C., Epton, T., Godlthorpe, J., Calam, R. and Armitage, C. J. (2019). ‘It’s difficult, I think it’s complicated’: Healthcare professionals’ barriers and enablers to providing opportunistic behaviour change interventions during routine medical consultation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 571592. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12368 Google Scholar
Krasny-Pacini, A., Hiebel, J., Pauly, F., Godon, S. and Chevignard, M. (2013). Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation: a literature-based update. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 56, 212230. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2013.02.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livingston, G. et al. (2017). Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. The Lancet Commissions, 390, 26732734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705717. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poppes, P., Vlaskamp, C., De Geeter, K. I. and Nakken, H. (2002). The importance of setting goals: the effect of instruction and training on the technical and instrinsic quality of goals. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 241250. doi: 10.1080/08856250210162149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabheru, K. et al. (2020). Behaviour activation for brain health in frontline care: a national knowledge translation project. Under review.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. E. and de Bruijn, G. J. (2013). How big is the physical activity intention–behaviour gap? A meta-analysis using the action control framework. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 296309. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockwood, K., Joyce, B. and Stolee, P. (1997). Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in cognitive rehabilitation patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 581588. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00014-0 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoeppe, S. et al. (2016). Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13, 126. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0454-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheeran, P. and Webb, T. L. (2016). The intention–behavior gap. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 503518. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoner, C. R. (2019). Positive psychiatry/psychology for older adults: a new and important movement but robust methodology is essential. International Psychogeriatrics Association, 31, 163165. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218002223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, Y.-T. and Wu, J.-S. (2018). The visual analogue scale for rating, ranking and paired-comparison (VAS-RRP): a new technique for psychological measurement. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 16941715. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoo, V., Freer, J. and Cassidy, K.-L. (2015). The fountain of health: bringing seniors’ mental health promotion into clinical practice. Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 18, 217224. doi: 10.5770/cgj.18.197 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, L. and McCabe, R. (2012). The effect of clinician-patient alliance and communication on treatment adherence in mental health care: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 12, 112. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-87 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valenzuela, M. and Sachdev, P. (2009). Can cognitive exercise prevent the onset of dementia? Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with longitudinal follow-up. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 179187. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181953b57 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voutilainen, A., Saaranen, T. and Sormunen, M. (2016). Conventional vs. e-learning in nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72, 946959. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R. et al. (2019). Clinically meaningful use of mental health apps and its effects on depression: mixed methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21, 112. doi: 10.2196/15644 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed