Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T22:01:20.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterizing Pathways of Invasive Plant Spread to Alaska: II. Propagules from Imported Hay and Straw

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeffery S. Conn ,
Casie A. Stockdale ,
Nancy R. Werdin-Pfisterer  and
Jenny C. Morgan
Jeffery S. Conn*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Subarctic Agricultural Research Unit, 360 O'Neill Building, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775
Casie A. Stockdale
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Subarctic Agricultural Research Unit, 360 O'Neill Building, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775
Nancy R. Werdin-Pfisterer
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Subarctic Agricultural Research Unit, 360 O'Neill Building, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775
Jenny C. Morgan
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Subarctic Agricultural Research Unit, 360 O'Neill Building, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jeff.conn@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The extent and nature of spread of exotic plant species to and within Alaska by shipment of hay and straw was studied. The amounts of hay and straw imported into Alaska and the amounts and types of seed in imported and locally produced hay and straw was determined We purchased alfalfa hay, wheat straw, ryegrass straw, and timothy hay produced in Washington and Oregon (WA–OR) and locally produced straw and hay. The hay and straw were shaken over screens, and the remaining fines were mixed with sterile potting soil and incubated in the greenhouse. Forty-nine plant species were identified from hay and straw, nine of which are ranked as invasive in Alaska, including downy brome, foxtail barley, hare barley, narrowleaf hawksbeard, and quackgrass—a prohibited weed in Alaska. The number of seeds ranged from 0 to 6,205 seeds kg−1, with an average of 585 seeds kg−1, and the number of species ranged from 0 to 12, with an average of 4.2 species per bale. Crop seed comprised a large proportion of the germinated seeds in ryegrass straw, wheat straw, and timothy/brome hay (98, 78, and 62%, respectively), but was less prevalent (ranging from 0 to 38%) in the other three hay and straw crop types. Hay and straw from Alaska contained more total seeds and species than hay and straw from WA-OR, but the difference was not significant when only weed seed was used in the analysis. Alaska-grown timothy/brome hay contained significantly more total seed than alfalfa hay and wheat straw from WA–OR and Alaska-grown barley straw. The grower or distributor of the hay and straw also influenced the number of seeds and species among some crop types. Results of this study document that large numbers of alien plant species are transported by movements of hay and straw into and within Alaska.

Keywords

Alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.downy brome, Bromus tectorum L. foxtail barley, Hordeum jubatum L. hare barley, Hordeum murinum L. ssp. leporinum (Link) Arcangnarrowleaf hawksbeard, Crepis tectorum L. quackgrass, Elymus repens (L.) Gouldryegrass, Lolium spp.timothy, Phleum pratense L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Pathwayshaystrawinvasive plantsindicator species
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 276 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous 2007. Alaska Food and Farm Product Directory and Resource Guide. State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Agriculture. Online directory: http:/http://dnr.alaska.gov/ag/ag_FFPD.htm. Accessed May 19, 2010.Google Scholar
Benz, S., Lucero, G., and Garibay, R. 2005. Alaska Agricultural Statistics 2004. Palmer, AK USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. 31 p.Google Scholar
Benz, S., Lucero, G., and Messer, C. 2008. Alaska Agricultural Statistics 2007. Palmer, AK USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. 31 p.Google Scholar
Carlson, M. L., Lapina, I. V., Shephard, M., Conn, J. S., Densmore, R., Spencer, P., Heys, J., Riley, J., and Nielsen, J. 2008. Juneau, AK: Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska. USDA Forest Service, Region 10, R10 Technical Publication 143. 218 p.Google Scholar
Carlson, M. L. and Shephard, M. 2007. Is the spread of non-native plants in Alaska accelerating? 111–127. In Harrington, T. B. and Reichard, S. H. eds. Meeting the Challenge: Invasive Plants in Pacific Northwest Ecosystems. Portland, OR U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-694.Google Scholar
Clines, J. 2005. Preventing weed spread via contaminated hay and straw. Pages 4–6. In Skurka, G. ed. Proceedings of the California Invasive Plant Council Symposium. Volume 9. Berkeley, CA California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC).Google Scholar
Colautti, R. I., Grigorovich, I., and MacIsaac, H. J. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 8:1023–1037.Google Scholar
Cole, D. N. 1983. Monitoring the condition of wilderness campsites. Ogden, UT USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-302. 10 p.Google Scholar
Conn, J. S., Stockdale, C. A., and Morgan, J. C. 2008. Characterizing pathways of invasive plant spread to Alaska: I. Propagules from container-grown ornamentals. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 1:331–336.Google Scholar
Davies, K. W. and Sheley, R. L. 2007. A conceptual framework for preventing the spatial dispersal of invasive plants. Weed Sci 55:178–184.Google Scholar
Dewey, L. H. 1897. Migration of weeds. Pages 263–286. in. United States Department of Agriculture Yearbook. Washington DC Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 2000. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255–265.Google Scholar
Dufrêne, M. and Legendre, P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr 67:345–366.Google Scholar
Erkelenz, P. A., Carter, R. J., Phillips, C., and Honan, I. M. 1990. Drought feeding and control of yellow burweed (Amsinckia spp.). Pages 53–56. In Heap, J. W. ed. Australian Weed Conference. 9th ed. Adelaide, Australia Crop Science Society of South Australia.Google Scholar
Flagstad, L. A., Cortes-Burns, H., Roberts, T., and Wright, C. L. 2009. Tracking weeds along the Iditarod National Historic Trail. Ketchikan, Alaska 10th Annual CNIPM Workshop. October 27–28, 2009.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. and Harvey, S. J. 1983. Relative abundance in an alien weed flora. Oecologia 59:292–295.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. and Harvey, S. J. 1988. Patterns of weed migration in northwestern U.S.A. Weed Sci 36:194–201.Google Scholar
Gower, S. T. 2008. Are horses responsible for introducing non-native plants along forest trails in the eastern United States? For. Ecol. Manag 256:997–1003.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S. 2004. Principles of weed management in agroecosystems and wildlands. Weed Technol 18:1559–1562.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. M. 2005. Merck Veterinary Manual. 9th ed. Whitehouse Station, NJ Merck Publishing. 2700 p.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N. 2003. Global plant dispersal, naturalization and invasion: pathways, modes and circumstances. Pages 3–30. In Ruiz, G. M. and Carlton, J. T. eds. Invasive Species Vectors and Management Strategies. Washington, DC Island Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, W. A., Milner, G., and Maxwell, B. 1998. Spotted knapweed distribution in stock camps and trails of the Selway–Bitterroot Wilderness. Great Basin Nat 58:156–166.Google Scholar
Marion, J. L., Cole, D. N., and Bratton, S. P. 1986. Exotic vegetation in wilderness areas. Pages 114–120. In Lucas, R. C. ed. Proceedings of the National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research. Ogden, UT USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-212.Google Scholar
McCune, B. and Grace, J. B. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. Gleneden Beach, OR MjM Software Design. 300 p.Google Scholar
[NAWMA] North American Weed Management Association 2006. North American Weed Free Forage Program Minimum Certification Standards. http://www.nawma.org/WFF/WFFStandards. Accessed: May 19, 2010.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment of U.S. Congress 1993. Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States. Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office. 391 p.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Holt, J. S., and Ghersa, C. M. 1997. Weed Ecology. Implications for Management. 2nd ed. New York J. Wiley. 1-6, 335–395.Google Scholar
Reichard, S. E. 1997. Prevention of invasive plant introductions on national and local levels. Pages 215–227. In Luken, J. O. and Thieret, J. W. eds. Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. New York Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rejmanek, M. and Randall, J. M. 1994. Invasive alien plants in California: 1993 summary and comparison with other areas in North America. Madroño 41:161–177.Google Scholar
Ruiz, G. M. and Carlton, J. T. 2003. Invasion vectors: a conceptual framework for management. Pages 459–504. In Ruiz, G. M. and Carlton, J. T. eds. Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies. Washington, DC Island Press.Google Scholar
Secomb, N. 2006. Defining the distribution of branched broomerape (Orobanche ramosa L.) by tracing the movement of potential vectors for the spread of seed. Pages 614–617. In Preston, C., Watts, J. H., and Crossman, N. D. eds. 15th Australian Weed Conference. Weed Management Society of South Australia. Adelaide.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Gill, A. M., Moore, P. H. R., and Forcella, F. 1984. Drought feeding and the dispersal of weeds. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci 50:103–107.Google Scholar
Thomas, N., Steele, J., King, C., Hunt, T., and Weiss, J. 2007. Weed Pathway Risk Assessment—Stage 2. Melbourne, Australia Department of Primary Industries. 51 p.Google Scholar
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region 2009. Weed-Free Feed and Straw Questions and Answers. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/weeds/weed-free/documents/weed-free-Q-A-2009-final.pdf. Accessed September 21, 2009.Google Scholar
Van der Meulen, A. W. and Sindel, B. M. 2008. Pathway risk analysis for weed spread within Australia (UNE61). Appendix 3: Review of literature. Armidale, NSW, Australia University of New England. 72 p.Google Scholar