Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T08:55:10.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transcendence between Expression and Secrecy: A Critical Cognitive Perspective on the Metaphorical Discourse of Yārsān Religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2022

Rahman Veisi Hasar Open the ORCID record for Rahman Veisi Hasar [Opens in a new window]  and
Kianoosh Rezania Open the ORCID record for Kianoosh Rezania [Opens in a new window]
Rahman Veisi Hasar*
Affiliation:
English Language and Linguistics, University of Kurdistan–Sanandaj, Sanandaj, Kurdistan, Iran
Kianoosh Rezania
Affiliation:
Center for Religious Studies, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
*
Corresponding author E-mail: veisirahman@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper seeks to shed light on the metaphorical discourse of the secretive minority religion of Yārsān. Metaphor is demonstrated as a central rhetorical device, applied as a linguistic apparatus that serves the ideology of concealment. To express heterodox concepts, Yārsān texts principally employ two rhetorical devices, metaphor and lexical substitution. The metaphorical models objectively conceptualize highly abstract religious notions and serve to obscure heretical concepts that strongly vary from established orthodox beliefs. As for lexical substitution, the most frequent metaphorical models are verbalized using foreign loanwords that are not common in Kurdish dialects. Together, these strategies construct a highly puzzling and mysterious discourse that is too difficult for outsiders to unravel. It can be argued that the metaphorical discourse of Yārsān functions as an anti-language that effectively challenges the limitations of expression imposed by the orthodox mainstream in the medieval era. Yārsān followers are able to express non-expressible ideas and disguise them within complicated imageries.

Keywords

Ahl-i Ḥaqqideologymetaphorical discoursesecrecyYārsān
Type
Article
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 55 , Special Issue 3: Persianate Pasts; National Presents: Persian Literary and Cultural Production in the Twentieth Century , July 2022 , pp. 791 - 811
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Iranian Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dīwān-i Gawra (unpublished manuscript, n.d.).Google Scholar
al-Baghdādī, ʾAbū Manṣūr ʿAbd-al-Qāhir b. Ṭāhir b. Muḥammad. Al-Farq bayn al-firaq wa-bayān al-firqa al-nājīya minhum. Edited by Badr., Muḥammad Qāhira: al-Maʿārif, 1328.Google Scholar
Bruinessen, Martin van. “Haji Bektash, Sultan Sahak, Shah Mina Sahib and Various Avatars of a Running Wall.” Turcica 21–23 (1991): 55–69.10.2143/TURC.23.0.2014188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruinessen, Martin van. “When Haji Bektash Still Bore the Name of Sultan Sahak: Notes on the Ahl-I Haqq of the Guran District.” In Mullas, Sufis and Heretics: The Role of Religion in Kurdish Society, edited by van Bruinessen, Martin, 245–69. Istanbul: Isis Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bruinessen, Martin van. “Between Dersim and Dâlahû: Reflections on Kurdish Alevism and the Ahl-i Haqq Religion.” In Islamic Alternatives: Non-Mainstream Religion in Persianate Societies, [Göttinger Orientforschungen, III. Reihe: Iranica, N.F.16], edited by Raei, Shahrokh, 65–93. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2017.10.2307/j.ctvckq47b.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, Henry. History of Islamic Philosophy. Translated by Sherrard, Liadain and Sherrard, Philip. London: Kegan Paul, 1993.Google Scholar
Crone, Patricia. The Nativist Prophets of Early Islamic Iran: Rural Revolt and Local Zoroastrianism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dakkiʾī, Fażlullāh. Dīwān-i Hażrat-i Bābā Nāʾus. Tehran: S̱ālis̱, 1394.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun A van. Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sharif, Ahmad. “Metaphors We Believe By: Islamic Doctrine as Evoked by the Prophet Muhammad's Metaphors.” Critical Discourse Studies 9, no. 3 (2012): 231–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. Language and Power. Language in Social Life Series. Harlow, UK: Longman, 1989.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman, 1995.Google Scholar
Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad. Kitāb ārāʾ ahl al-madīna al-fāẓila. Edited by Naṣrī, Nādir Albīr. Beirut: Dār Mashriq, 1995.Google Scholar
Gomola, Aleksander. “From GOD IS FATHER to GOD IS A FRIEND: Conceptual Integration in Metaphors for God in Christian Discourse.” In Cognitive Linguistics in Action, edited by Tabakowska, Elżbieta, Choinski, Michal, and Wiraszka, Lukasz, 387–407. Applications of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2010.Google Scholar
Group, Pragglejaz. “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 22, no. 1 (2007): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Metaphor: Toward a Theoretical Framework.” Critical Discourse Studies 5, no. 2 (May 2008): 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, Keith James, and Thagard, Paul. Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Ḥusainī, Muḥammad, ed. Dīwān-i Gawra. Kirmānshāh: Bāgh-i Nay, 1387.Google Scholar
Ḥusainī, Muḥammad, ed. Rohtāw. 2 vols. Sulaimānīya: Kurdish Cultural Institute, 2010–11.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīnā, Abū ʿAlī Ḥusain. Ḥayy b. Yaqẓān va Salāmān va ʾAbsāl. Edited by Ḍiyāʾ-al-dīn Sajjādī, . Tehran: Surūsh, 1374. https://www.noorlib.ir/View/fa/Book/BookView/Image/17951.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīnā, Abū ʿAlī Ḥusain. Al-Nafs min kitāb al-shafāʾ. Edited by Ḥasan Ḥasanzādi Āmulī, . Qum: al-Maktab al-iʿlām al-islāmī, 1375.Google Scholar
Jayḥūn-ābādī, Niʿmat-allāh. Shāhnāmi-yi ḥaqīqat. Edited by Mukrī, Muḥammad. Tehran: Ṭahūrī, 1361.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Philip G. “Mithra and Ahreman, Binyāmīn and Malak Ṭāwūs: Traces of an Ancient Myth in the Cosmogonies of Two Modern Sects.” In Recurrent Patterns in Iranian Religions: From Mazdaism to Sufism, edited by Gignoux, Philippe, 57–79. Paris: Association pour l'avancement des Études Iraniennes, 1992.Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Philip G. “Modern Sects with Ancient Roots: The Yezidis and Ahle-Haqq of Kurdistan.” In A Zoroastrian Tapestry: Art, Religion and Culture, edited by Godrej, P. and Mistree, F., 260–77. Ahmedabad, India: Mapin, 2002.Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Philip G. “The Yezidi and Yarsan Traditions.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Zoroastrianism, edited by Michael Stausberg, Yuhan Sohrab-Dinshaw Vevaina, and Anna Tessmann, 499–504. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785539.ch32.Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Philip, and Chamanara, Behrooz. “Literary Gurāni: Koinè or Continuum?” In Joyce Blau l’éternelle chez les Kurdes, edited by Bozarslan, Hamit and Scalbert-Yücel, Clémence, 151–69. Istanbul: Institut français d’études anatoliennes, 2013.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. “Conceptual Metaphor: The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Reading, 185–238. Berlin: Mouton, 2006.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. N. “Some Gorānī Lyric Verse.” BSOAS 28, no. 2 (1965): 255–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Maqdisī, Muṭahhar b. Ṭāhir. Al-Badʾ wa-l-tārīkh. Edited by Huart, Clement. Paris: Leroux, 1899–1916.Google Scholar
Minorski, Vladimir F. “Notes sur la secte des Ahlé Haqq.” Revue du monde musulman 40, 45 (1920, 1921): 20–97, 205–302.Google Scholar
Minorski, Vladimir F. “Études sur les Ahl-i Haqq, I Toumari.” Revue de l'histoire des religions 97, no. 1 (1928): 90–105.Google Scholar
Minorski, Vladimir F. “The Gūrān.” BSOAS 11, no. 1 (1943): 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukrī, Muḥammad. Gawrani: La grande assémblée des fidéles de vérité au tribunal sur le mont Zagros en Iran (Dawra-y Diwana-gawra): étude d'hérésiologie islamique et de thèmes mythico-religieux iraniens; livre secret et inédit en gourani ancien. Paris: Klincksieck, 1977.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 9, no. 3 (2012): 301–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omarkhali, Khanna, and Rezania, Kianoosh. “Some Reflections on Concepts of Time in Yezidism.” In From Daēnā to Dîn: Religion, Kultur Und Sprache in Der Iranischen Welt: Festschrift Für Philip Kreyenbroek Zum 60. Geburtstag, edited by Allison, Christine, Joisten-Pruschke, Anke, and Wendtland, Antje, 337–52. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2009.Google Scholar
Quṭb al-dīn Shīrāzī, Maḥmūd b. Masʿūd. Sharḥ ḥikmat al-ishrāq. Edited by ʿNūrānī, Abdallāh and Muḥaqqiq, Mihdī. Tehran: Anjuman-i āthār va mafākhir-i farhangī, 1384.Google Scholar
Ṣafīzadih, Ṣiddīq. Dānishnāmi-yi nāmāvarān-i yārsān. Tehran: Hirmand, 1376.Google Scholar
Ṣafīzadih, Ṣiddīq. Mezhuy wezhay kordi. Hawler: Aras, 2008.Google Scholar
Shabistarī, Maḥmūd. Gulshan-i rāz. Edited by Khunjī, Amīr Ḥusain. Tehran: electronic publication, 2013.Google Scholar
al-Shahristānī, Abū al-Fatḥ Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Karīm. Al-Milal wa-l-niḥal. Edited by Cureton, William. 2 vols. London: Society for the Publication of Oriental Texts, 1842–1846.Google Scholar
Suhravardī, Yaḥyā Habash. Ḥikmat al-ishrāq. Translated by Jaʿfar Sajjādī. Tehran: Tehran University, 1384.Google Scholar
Suhravardī, Yaḥyā Habash. Qiṣṣi-hā-yi shaykh-i ishrāq. Edited by Ṣādiqī, Jaʿfar Mudarris. Tehran: Markaz, 1375.Google Scholar
Tabrīzī, Sām-al-dīn, ed. Dīwān-i Rohtāw (unpublished manuscript, n.d.).Google Scholar
Ṭāhirī, Ṭayyib, ed. Nāma-y saranjām. Erbil, Kurdistan: Ārās, 2007.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar