Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T22:32:27.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The cost of presidential impeachment to politically connected firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2019

Ha Na Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioral Socioeconomics, Ewha Womans University, 203, Graduate School Building, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul03760, Korea
B. K. Song*
Affiliation:
Department of Policy Studies, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul04763, South Korea
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: bksong99@gmail.com

Abstract

This study examines the ways political events can affect the stock prices of politically connected firms by studying one of the biggest corruption scandals in modern South Korean history, which led to the first-ever impeachment of a sitting president. We analyzed the stock returns of firms that donated money to foundations allegedly controlled by the president's confidante. We found that the abnormal stock returns of politically connected firms decreased when the president was removed from office. Using tick-by-tick stock price data, we were able to pinpoint the exact moments when the stock prices of firms that donated money fluctuated, as the president's fate was determined by the justices of the Constitutional Court.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D, Johnson, S, Kermani, A, Kwak, J and Mitton, T (2016) The value of connections in turbulent times: evidence from the United States. Journal of Financial Economics 121, 368391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akey, P (2015) Valuing changes in political networks: evidence from campaign contributions to close congressional elections. The Review of Financial Studies 28, 31883223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S, De Figueiredo, JM and Snyder, JM Jr (2003) Why is there so little money in US politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17, 105130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S, Snyder, JM Jr and Ueda, M (2004) Did firms profit from soft money? Election Law Journal 3, 193198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, JY, Lo, AW-C and MacKinlay, AC (1997) The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H-s (2017) Park enquired about SK's Mir, K-Sports donations: SK chief. Korea Herald, 22 June 2017. Available at http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20170622000822 (accessed 27 November 2017).Google Scholar
Claessens, S, Feijen, E and Laeven, L (2008) Political connections and preferential access to finance: the role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics 88, 554580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulomb, R and Sangnier, M (2014) The impact of political majorities on firm value: do electoral promises or friendship connections matter? Journal of Public Economics 115, 158170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccio, M (2006) Politically connected firms. American Economic Review 96, 369386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccio, M and Parsley, DC (2009) Sudden deaths: taking stock of geographic ties. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 44, 683718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, R (2001) Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review 91, 10951102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, D, Fisman, RJ, Galef, J, Khurana, R and Wang, Y (2012) Estimating the value of connections to vice-president Cheney. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 12.Google Scholar
Gaikwad, N (2013) Presidential prospects, political support, and stock market performance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S and Mo, J (2000) The political economy of the Korean financial crisis. Review of International Political Economy 7, 197218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayachandran, S (2006) The Jeffords effect. Journal of Law and Economics 49, 397425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, DC (2002) Bad loans to good friends: money politics and the developmental state in South Korea. International Organization 56, 177207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, H-S (2017) A closer look at the Korean Constitutional Court's ruling on park Geun-hye's impeachment. Yale Journal of International Law, 18 May 2017. Available at http://www.yjil.yale.edu/a-closer-look-at-the-korean-constitutional-courts-ruling-on-park-geun-hyes-impeachment/ (accessed 27 November 2017).Google Scholar
Macfarlane, A and Lee, T (2017) South Korea's corruption scandal ensnares 2nd top boss. CNN Money, 18 April 2017. http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/17/news/companies/lotte-chairman-bribery-indictment/index.html (Accessed 27 November 2017).Google Scholar
McCurry, J (2017) South Korea prosecutors demand 12-year sentence for Samsung boss. CNN Money, August 7, 2017. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/07/south-korea-prosecutors-demand-12-year-sentence-samsung-boss (accessed 27 November 2017).Google Scholar
Ramalho, R (2007) The persistence of corruption: evidence from the 1992 presidential impeachment in Brazil. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Roberts, BE (1990) A dead senator tells no lies: seniority and the distribution of federal benefits. American Journal of Political Science 34, 3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenherr, D (2019) Political connections and allocative distortions. Journal of Finance 74, 543586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shon, JJ (2010) Do stock returns vary with campaign contributions? Bush vs. Gore: the Florida recount. Economics & Politics 22, 257281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, J (2007) Contingent political capital and international alliances: evidence from South Korea. Administrative Science Quarterly 52, 621666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratmann, T (2005) Some talk: money in politics. a (partial) review of the literature. Public Choice 124, 135156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, T (2011) The sound, the fury, and the nonevent: business power and market reactions to the citizens united decision. American Politics Research 39, 118141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar