Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T17:00:10.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Economic, Hydrologic, and Environmental Assessment of Water Management Alternative Plans for the South Central Texas Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Dhazn Gillig
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Bruce A. McCarl
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Frederick Boadu
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

Abstract

Regional water scarcity has motivated the South Central Texas Regional Water Planning Group to actively develop water management plans to address long-/short-term regional water needs. This study, therefore, develops an integrated Edwards Aquifer groundwater and river system simulation model to determine the “best” choice of regional water management plans using mixed-integer linear programming. The economic, hydrologic, and environmental consequences of the “best” choice of regional and other water management plans and options are evaluated and compared. Results indicate a tradeoff between the economic and environmental benefits. A slight decrease in economic benefit results in a substantial increase in environmental benefit.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A.GAMS: A user's guide release 2.25. Scientific Press, Redwood City, California, 1992.Google Scholar
Dantzig, G. B.Linear Programming Under Uncertainty.” Management Science 1(1955): 197206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorenbos, J., and Praitt, W. O.. Guidelines for Predicting Crop Water Requirements. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, Rome, 1977.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, G. A.The Edwards Aquifer Home Page. http://www.txdirect.net/users/eckhardt. 1998.Google Scholar
Griffin, R. C., and Chang, C.Seasonality in Community Water Demand.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 16(1991):207217.Google Scholar
HDR Engineering, Inc., and Geraghty & Miller, Inc. Nueces River Basin Regional Water Supply Planning Study, Phase I, Vols. 1–3. Report prepared for the Nueces River Authority, Uvalde, Texas, 1991.Google Scholar
HDR Engineering, Inc., and Espey, Huston and Association, Inc. Guadalupe-San Antonio River Basin Recharge Enhancement Study, Vols. 1–3. Technical report prepared for the Edwards Aquifer Underground Water District, San Antonio, Texas, 1993.Google Scholar
HDR Engineering, Inc. Water Supply Update for City of Corpus Christi Service Area. Report prepared for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, 1999.Google Scholar
Heimes, F. J., and Luckey, R. R.. Estimating 1980 Groundwater Pumpage for Irrigation on the High Plains in Parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. USGS, Water Resources Investigation Report 83-4123, Denver, Colorado, 1983.Google Scholar
Longley, G.The Subterranean Aquatic Ecosystem of the Balcones Fault Zone Edwards Aquifer in Texas—Threats from Overpumping.” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Ground Water Ecology, Ed. Stanford, J. A. and Simons, J.J., Tampa, Florida, April 26-29, 291300, 1992.Google Scholar
McCarl, B. A., Keplinger, K. O., Dillon, C., and Williams, R. L.Limiting Pumping from the Edwards Aquifer: An Economic Investigation of Proposals, Water Markets and Springflow Guar antees.” Water Resources Research, 35(1999): 1257-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzetti, S.An Economic Study of Industrial Water Demands in British Columbia, Canada.” Water Resources Research, 24(1988): 15691573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
South Central Texas Regional Water Planning Group web-page http://www.watershedexperience.com/plans/. 2000.Google Scholar
Texas Water Development Board, Austin, Texas. Surveys of Irrigation in Texas 1958, 1964, 1969, 1974, 1979, 1984, 1989, and 1994. Report 347. 1996.Google Scholar
USGS, United States Geological Survey, Austin, Texas. Recharge to and Discharge from the Edwards Aquifer in the San Antonio Area, Texas. various issues, the 1997 report is on http://tx.usgs.gov/reports/district/98/01/index.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Water News Online. editor@uswaternews.com. November 1998.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R., Jones, C. A., Kiniry, J. R., and Spaniel, D. A.The EPIC Crop Growth Model.” Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 32(1989):497511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L., and Associates, Inc. “The Programmatic Assessment: Proposed Rules 31 TAC Chapters 701, 702, 703, 705, 707, 709, and 711.” Final draft prepared for The Edwards Aquifer Authority, Texas, 2000.Google Scholar