Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T09:51:49.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Alternative Payment Arrangements on the Performance of Florida Sugarcane Cooperatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Rigoberto A. Lopez  and
Thomas H. Spreen
Rigoberto A. Lopez
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, Cook College, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey
Thomas H. Spreen
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Payment arrangements among members of a cooperative play a critical role in the performance of the cooperative. The impact of three payment systems is assessed for Florida sugarcane cooperatives through a bi-level programming model which incorporates both individual and collective behavior.

Keywords

cooperativesmathematical programmingsugarcane
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , December 1984 , pp. 99 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsen, M. A. Cooperative Business Enterprise, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.Google Scholar
Aresvik, O. “Comments on ‘Economic Nature of the Cooperative Association.’” J. Farm Econ., 37(1955):140–144. Google Scholar
Alvarez, J., Crane, D. R., Spreen, T. H., and Kidder, G.. “A Yield Prediction Model for Florida Sugarcane.” Agr. Systems, 9(1982):161–179.Google Scholar
Bar, J. “A Mathematical Model of a Village Cooperative Based on the Decomposition Principle of Linear Programming.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 57(1975):353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, G. H., Brown, G. G., and Graves, G. W. “Design and Implementation of Large Scale Primal Transshipment Algorithms.” Management Science, 24(1977):1–34.Google Scholar
Buccola, S. and Subaei, A.. “Optimal Market Pools and Cooperative Income Distribution Policy.” Selected paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Meetings, West Lafayette, Indiana, July 31-August 3, 1983.Google Scholar
Candler, W., Fortuny-Amat, J., and McCarl, B.. “The Potential Role of Multilevel Programming in Agricultural Economics.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1981):521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, D. R., Spreen, T. H., Alvarez, J., and Kidder, G.. “An Analysis of the Stubble Replacement Decision for Florida Sugarcane Growers.” Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 822, 1982.Google Scholar
Hardie, I. W. “Shadow Prices as Member Returns for a Marketing Cooperative.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 51(1969):818–823.Google Scholar
Helmberger, P. G., Campbell, G. R., and Dobson, W. D. “Organization and Performance of Agricultural Markets.” In A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Vol. 3. Martin, Lee R., ed. University of Minnesota Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Helmberger, D. and Hoos, S.. “Cooperative Enterprise and Organization Theory.” J. Farm Econ., 44(1962):275–290.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Posson Smith, W. G., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909.Google Scholar
Knutson, R. D. “The Impact of Cooperatives on Market Performance, Subsector Coordination and the Organization of Agriculture.” In Agricultural Cooperatives and the Public Interest. Marion, B. W., ed. North Central Project 117, Monograph 4, 1978.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. W. “A Model of a Bargaining Cooperative.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 56(1974):509–519.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. W. “The Objective of the Cooperative Association.” In Development and Application of Cooperative Theory and Measurement of Performance. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Cooperative Service, Staff Report, 1982.Google Scholar
LeVay, C. “Agricultural Co-operative Theory: A Review.” J. Agr. Econ., 34(1983):1–44.Google Scholar
Lopez, R. A. “The Impact of Alternative Marketing Arrangements on the Performance of Processing Cooperatives.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, 1983.Google Scholar
Lopez, R. A. and Spreen, T. H. “A Conceptual Analysis of Processing Cooperatives.” Selected paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Meetings, West Lafayette, Indiana, July 31- August 3, 1983.Google Scholar
Meade, G. P. and Chen, J. C. P. Cane Sugar Handbook, 10th ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1977.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D. and James, N. I. “Maturity of Six Sugarcane Varieties in Florida.” Proceedings of the American Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 7(1978):107–111.Google Scholar
Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Shaffer, J. D. “On the Ownership and Control of Farmer Cooperatives.” In Agricultural Cooperatives and the Public Interest. Marion, B. W., ed. North Central Project 117, Monograph 4, 1978.Google Scholar
Trifon, R. “The Economics of Cooperative Ventures—Further Comments.” J. Farm Econ., 43(1961):215–235.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Cost of Producing and Processing Sugarcane and Sugarbeets in the United States, Economics and Statistics Service, ESS Staff Report AGE55810421, 1981.Google Scholar
Zepp, G. “The Florida Sugar Industry: Its Past, Present and Future Prospect.” Sugar and Sweetness Report. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1(1976):45–50.Google Scholar
Zusman, P. “Group Choice in an Agricultural Marketing Cooperative.” The Canadian J. Econ., 15(1982):220–234.Google Scholar