Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T16:47:00.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of the effect of weed competition on growth and yield attributes in sorghum (Sorghum vulgare), cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) and green gram (Vigna aureus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. A. C. Enyi
B. A. C. Enyi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Morogoro, W. Tanzania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In each of the crops studied, weeding increased grain yield, weeding 2 weeks after sowing being better than weeding either four or eight weeks after sowing and weeding two and four weeks after sowing being better than weeding either two and eight weeks or four and eight weeks aftersowing. Weeding thrice (two, four and eight weeks after sowing) was significantly superior to all the other weeding treatments. Weeding increased leaf area index, dry weight of side and mainstem and number of mature pods at harvest in green gram and cowpeas. In sorghum, apart from increasing leaf area index, it also increased the length of ears and grain weight per unit lengthof ear. The weeding treatments affected grain yield in cowpeas and green gram due totheir influence on leaf area development, development of the main and side stems and on the number of mature pods produced at harvest. The effect of the weeding treatments on grain yield of sorghum was due to their influence on leaf area development, length of ear and grain weight perunit length of ear.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , December 1973 , pp. 449 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archbold, H. K. (1942). Physiological studies in plant nutrition. XIII. Experiments with barley on defoliation and shading of the ear in. relation to sugar metabolism. Ann. Bot. 6, 487–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archbold, H. K. & Mukerjee, B. N. (1942). Physiological studies in plant nutrition. XII. Carbohydrate changes in the several organs of the barley during growth with special reference to the development and ripening of the ear. Ann. Bot. 6, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonstra, A. E. H. R. (1929). Involved van de verschillende assimileerende deelen op de korrelpoodutio bij wilhenlminatarwe Meded. Landhoogesch Wageningen 33, 21.Google Scholar
Enyi, B. A. C. (1960). M.Sc. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Goldson, J. R. (1967). Weeding requirements of groundnuts in Western Kenya. E. Afr. agric. For. J. 32, 246–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerton, J. L. (1967). Effect of weed control and nitrogen application on the yield and nitrogen content of kale. Weed Res. 7, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, J. R. & Brown, K. J. (1960). Effect of management on increasing crop yields in the Lake Province of Tanganyika. E. afr. agric. For. J. 26, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. K. & Burleigh, R. J. F. (1958). Experimental results of selective weed control in sorghum (Dura) with M.C.P.A. and 2,4.D in the Sudan. Proc. Afr. Weed Control Conf. pp. 86–91.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. H. (1965). Photosynthesis of ears and flag leaves of wheat and barley. Ann. Bot. 29, 317–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbank, P. J., French, S. A. W. & Witts, K. J. (1966). Dependence of yields of wheat varieties on their leaf area duration. Ann. Bot. 30, 291–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar