Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T10:24:15.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concentration and availability to sheep of N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Na in chickweed, dandelion, dock, ribwort and spurrey, compared with perennial ryegrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Wilman  and
R. W. Derrick
D. Wilman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
R. W. Derrick
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The concentrations of water-soluble carbohydrate, N, nitrate-N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Na were determined in six plant species: chickweed (Stellaria media (L.) Vill.), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Weber), dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.), ribwort (Plantago lanceolata L.), spurrey (Spergula arvensis L.) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Field crops of these species were grown at Aberystwyth in 1985,1986 and 1987. In 1985 and 1986 the rumen contents and faeces of lambs fed artificially dried diets of the different species were analysed for N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Na. The intake, apparent availability and, in 1986, retention of each element by the lambs on each diet were calculated.

The results illustrate the potential of dicotyledonous species to extend the range of concentration of some major elements beyond that normally found in temperate grasses. Chickweed was particularly high in P and K, dandelion in K and Mg, dock in Mg, ribwort in Ca and spurrey in Mg and Na. The apparent availability of the elements studied was as high in chickweed, dandelion and spurrey as in ryegrass. The apparent availability of N and P was lower in dock and ribwort than in ryegrass, possibly due to heat damage during drying. All five dicotyledonous species had a higher Mg concentration in herbage than ryegrass (c. 70% higher, on average) and all led to a higher Mg concentration in rumen contents than ryegrass (c. 70% higher, on average). Retention of Mg was three times as great, on average, in sheep fed dicotyledonous diets as in sheep fed ryegrass. The concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate was lower in the dicotyledonous species than in ryegrass. The concentration of nitrate-N was rather high in ribwort when harvested at a leafy stage in October. Dock was moderately low in nitrate-N, despite a rather high concentration of total N.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 122 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 217 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Technical review by an Agricultural Research Council Working Party. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Bergen, P., Mover, J. R. & Kozub, G. C. (1990). Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) use by cattle grazing on irrigated pasture. Weed Technology 4, 258–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrick, R. W., Moseley, G. & Wilman, D. (1993). Intake, By sheep, and digestibility of chickweed, dandelion, dock, ribwort and spurrey, compared with perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faithfull, N. T. (1971). Automated simultaneous determination of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and calcium on the same herbage digest solution. Laboratory Practice 20, 41–44.Google Scholar
Faithfull, N. T. (1974). The analysis of magnesium in herbage Kjeldahl digests by atomic absorption spectrophotometry with the nitrous oxide/acetylene flame. Laboratory Practice 23, 177–178.Google Scholar
Follett, M. J. & Ratcliff, P. W. (1963). Determination of nitrite and nitrate in meat products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 14, 138–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, L. (1988). Herbs in pastures. Development and research in Britain, 1850–1984. Biological Agriculture and Horticultures, 5 97–133.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1990). Forage in Ruminant Nutrition. San Diego, California: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Moseley, G. & Baker, D. H. (1991). The efficacy of a high magnesium grass cultivar in controlling hypomagnesaemia in grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 46, 375–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. M. (1977). Metabolic Diseases in Farm Animals. London: William Heinemann Medical Books.Google Scholar
Rudeforth, C. C. (1970). Soils of North Cardiganshire. Harpenden: Soil Survey of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W. & Diekmahns, E. C. (Eds) (1972). Grasses and Legumes in British Agriculture. Bulletin no. 49, Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. (1935). The Land Now and To-morrow. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Thomas, B., Thompson, A., Oyenuga, V. A. & Armstrong, R. H. (1952). The ash constituents of some herbage plants at different stages of maturity. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 20, 10–22.Google Scholar
Thomas, T. A. (1977). An automated procedure for the determination of soluble carbohydrates in herbage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 639–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, E. J. (1981). The Mineral Nutrition of Livestock, 2nd edn.Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Waghorn, G. C. & Jones, W. T. (1989). Bloat in cattle. 46. Potential of dock (Rumex obtusifolius) as an antibloat agent for cattle. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D. & Mzamane, N. (1982). The content and yield Of six elements in four grasses as affected by nitrogen application and interval between harvests. Fertilizer Research 3, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D. & Riley, J. A. (1993). Potential nutritive value of a wide range of grassland species. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120, 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar