Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T16:56:23.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of genotype and rainfall on yield and quality of forage barley and wheat varieties in a semi-arid region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Hadjichristodoulou
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus

Summary

The effect of rainfall on dry-matter (D.M.) yield, D.M. content and crude protein (CP) content of eight barley and three wheat varieties was studied under semi-arid conditions in Cyprus for 5 years. The best variety was 628 barley, which gave the highest mean yields (6·7 and 0·69 t/ha of D.M. and CP respectively), showed the highest response to annual rainfall (33 g D.M./mm rainfall) and gave high yields in all environments, D.M. yield was not affected significantly by earliness but late varieties had higher D.M. and lower CP contents than early varieties. All varieties showed around average stability. Regression coefficients between D.M. yield and mean yield of varieties for all environments ranged from 0·81 to 1·14 and were not related to D.M. yield of varieties.

The fraction of the variation in D.M. yield explained by the variation in annual rainfall varied with variety from 25% to 67%. Multiple regression analysis using the annual rainfall and the rainfall 1 and 2 months before harvesting produced a slightly, but not significantly, higher correlation over the simple correlation between D.M. yield and annual rainfall. Varietal response to annual rainfall, as expressed by the regression coefficient between D.M. yield and annual rainfall, was positively related to D.M. yield (r = 0·84, P < 0·01).

The correlation coefficients between D.M. content and annual rainfall ranged from −0·46 to −0·92 while that of CP content and annual rainfall, though not significant in most cases, also tended to be negative.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cannell, R. G. & Jobson, H. T. (1968). The relationship between yield and digestibility in spring varieties of barley, oats and wheat after ear emergence. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 71, 337–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della, A. & Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1976). Genetic variability in uptake of nitrogen at various growth stages of barley and wheat under dryland conditions. In: International Atomic Energy Agency (ed.), Nuclear Techniques for Seed Protein Improvement III, Proceedings of a Research Co-ordination meeting, Hahnenklee, F.R.G., 1975 (in the press).Google Scholar
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–54.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1973). Production of forage from cereals, legumes and their mixtures under rainfed conditions in Cyprus. Cyprus Agricultural Research Institute, Technical Bulletin 14, 18 pp.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1975). Effect of seed rate on forage production of cereals and legumes under rainfed conditions. Cyprus Agricultural Research Institute, Technical Bulletin 19, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1976). Effect of harvesting stage on cereal and legume forage production in low rainfall regions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 155–61.Google Scholar
Lomas, J. & Shashoua, Y. (1973). The effect of rainfall on wheat yields in an arid region In: Unesco (ed.), Plant Response to Climatic Factors, pp. 531–8. Proc. Uppsala Symp. 1970.Google Scholar
McNeal, F. H., Boatwright, G. O., Berg, M. A. & Watson, C. A. (1968). Nitrogen in plant parts of seven spring wheat varieties at successive stages of development. Crop Science 8, 535–7.Google Scholar
Sprague, M. A. (1962). Cereals as forage, p. 337–45. In Forages (ed. Hughes, H. D., Heath, M. E. and Metcalfe, D. S.), Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Wilsie, C. P. (1962). Crop Adaptation and Distribution. London: Freeman. 448 pp.Google Scholar