Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T13:33:00.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet: II. Nutrient concentration and uptake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmund's, Suffolk
M. J. Durrant
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmund's, Suffolk

Summary

The concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, calcium and magnesium was measured in the dry matter of sugar beet from four field experiments (1966–9). All combinations of four amounts of nitrogen fertilizer (0–1·8 cwt/acre), four plant populations (8800–54000 plants/acre) and irrigation were tested, which gave a wide range of plant size and yield. Nutrient concentration and uptake by the crop were also greatly affected by the treatments.

Nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation increased uptake of nitrogen by the crop but increasing the plant population had little effect on uptake and decreased the concentration of nitrogen. Sugar yield was related to the total nitrogen concentration in tops and roots and to uptake. There were optimal values of nitrogen concentration for maximal sugar yield, but the optima were greatly affected by plant population. Leaf colour was a good guide to nitrogen concentration.

Phosphorus concentration was affected little by the treatments but cation concentrations were greatly affected. In general, uptake of all the elements was increased by all treatments – the exception was sodium, which decreased as the plant population increased but this was balanced to somo extent by increased potassium uptake.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bremner, P. M., El Saaed, E. A. K. & Scott, R. K. (1967). Some aspects of competitition for light in potatoes and sugar beet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 283–90.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Marsh, J. A. P. & Tinker, P. B. H. (1970). Sodium and potassium relationships in sugar beet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74, 567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Webb, D. J. (1971). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. Part I. Yields. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 76, 261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. M. (1970). The interaction between plant density and irrigation in the sugar beet crop. XXXIIIrd Wint. Congr. Inst. Int. Rech. Betteravier, Brussels.Google Scholar
Heathcote, G. D. (1970). Effect of plant spacing and time of sowing of sugar beet on aphid infestation and spread of virus yellows. Pl. Path. 19, 3239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar