Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T17:31:18.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of offering grass silage alone or in combination with lupin/triticale, lupin/wheat or pea/oat whole-crop silages on animal performance, meat quality and fatty acid composition of beef from cattle offered two levels of concentrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2019

P. C. Kennedy ,
L. E. R. Dawson ,
F. O. Lively ,
R. W. J. Steen ,
A. M. Fearon ,
B. W. Moss  and
D. J. Kilpatrick
P. C. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down, BT26 6DR, UK
L. E. R. Dawson
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down, BT26 6DR, UK
F. O. Lively*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down, BT26 6DR, UK
R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down, BT26 6DR, UK
A. M. Fearon
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, UK
B. W. Moss
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, UK
D. J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, UK
*
Author for correspondence: F.O. Lively, E-mail: francis.lively@afbini.gov.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to examine the effects of offering beef cattle five silage diets. These were perennial ryegrass silage (PRGS) as the sole forage, tall fescue/perennial ryegrass silage (FGS) as the sole forage, PRGS in a 50:50 ratio on a dry matter (DM) basis with lupin/triticale silage (LTS), lupin/wheat silage (LWS) and pea/oat silage (POS). Each of the five silage diets was supplemented with 4 and 7 kg of concentrates/head/day in a five silages × two concentrate intakes factorial design. A total of 90 cattle were used in the 121-day experiment. The grass silages were of medium digestibility and were well preserved. The legume/cereal silages had high ammonia N, high acetic acid, low lactic acid, low butyric acid and low digestible organic matter concentrations (542, 562 and 502 g/kg DM for LTS, LWS and POS, respectively). Silage treatment did not significantly affect liveweight gain, carcass gain, carcass characteristics, the instrumental assessment of meat quality or fatty acid composition of the M. longissimus dorsi muscle. In view of the low yields of the legume/cereal crops, it is concluded that the inclusion of spring-sown legume/cereal silages in the diets of beef cattle is unlikely to be advantageous.

Keywords

Beef cattlecereallegumesilagewholecrop
Type
Animal Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 8 , October 2018 , pp. 1017 - 1027
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965) Recommended Procedures for Use in the Measurement of Beef Cattle and Carcasses. London, UK: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Blaxter, KL and Clapperton, JL (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A, Harrington, G and Smith, RJ (1972) Tissue separation – to assess beef and lamb variation. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 1, 113–122.Google Scholar
Dawson, LER (2012) The effect of inclusion of lupins/triticale whole crop silage in the diet of winter finishing beef cattle on their performance and meat quality at two levels of concentrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology 171, 75–84.Google Scholar
Dewhurst, RJ, Scollan, ND, Youell, SJ, Tweed, JKS and Humphreys, MO (2001) Influence of species, cutting date and cutting interval on the fatty acid composition of grasses. Grass and Forage Science 56, 68–74.Google Scholar
Dewhurst, RJ, Fisher, WJ, Tweed, JKS and Wilkins, RJ (2003) Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 1. Production responses with different levels of concentrate. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2598–2611.Google Scholar
Dewhurst, RJ, Delaby, L, Moloney, A, Boland, T and Lewis, E (2009) Nutritive value of forage legumes used for grazing and silage. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 48, 167–187.Google Scholar
Drennan, MJ and Keane, MG (1987) Concentrate feeding levels for unimplanted and implanted finishing steers fed silage. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 129–137.Google Scholar
Elgersma, A, Ellen, G, Dekker, PR, van der Horst, H, Boer, H and Tamminga, S (2003) Effects of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) cultivars with different linolenic acid contents on milk fatty acid composition. Aspects of Applied Biology 70, 107–114.Google Scholar
Enser, M, Richardson, RI, Nute, GR, Fisher, AV, Scollan, ND and Wood, JD (2001) Effect of red and white clover on beef eating quality. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 26, 75–76.Google Scholar
Farmer, LJ, Moss, BW, Gault, NFS, Tolland, ELC and Tollerton, IJ (2005) Studies on beef eating quality in northern Ireland. In The Science of Beef Quality, 8th Annual Langford Food Industry Conference. Penicuik, UK: British Society of Animal Science, pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
Fraser, MD, Fychan, AR and Jones, R (2001) The effect of harvest date and inoculation on the yield, fermentation characteristics and feeding value of forage pea and field bean silages. Grass and Forage Science 56, 218–230.Google Scholar
Fraser, MD, Fychan, R and Jones, R (2005) The effect of harvest date and inoculation on the yield and fermentation characteristics of two varieties of white lupin (Lupinus albus) when ensiled as a whole-crop. Animal Feed Science and Technology 119, 307–322.Google Scholar
French, P, O'Riordan, EG, Monahan, FJ, Caffrey, PJ and Moloney, AP (2003) Fatty acid composition of intra-muscular triacylglycerols of steers fed autumn grass and concentrates. Livestock Production Science 81, 307–317.Google Scholar
Fychan, R, Marley, CL, Theobald, VJ, Roberts, JE and Jones, R (2009) The yield and chemical composition of three lupin varieties at harvest and ensiled as crimped grain. In British Grassland Society, Ninth Research Conference. Nantwich, UK: British Grassland Society, pp. 31–32.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ (2005) Ensiled maize and whole crop wheat forages for beef and dairy cattle: effects on animal performance. In Park, RS and Stronge, MD (eds), Silage Production and Utilisation. Proceedings of the XIVth International Silage Conference. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ and Kilpatrick, DJ (2005) Prediction of carcass weight from live weight. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 2005, 179.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ and Gordon, AW (2006) The effects of maturity of maize at harvest and level of maize in forage based diets on the performance of beef cattle. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 2006, 46.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Lively, FO, Kilpatrick, DJ and Moss, BW (2007) Effects of replacing grass silage with either maize or whole-crop wheat silages on the performance and meat quality of beef cattle offered two levels of concentrates. Animal: An International Journal of Animal Bioscience 1, 613–623.Google Scholar
Keane, MG, Drennan, MJ and Moloney, AP (2006) Comparison of supplementary concentrate levels with grass silage, separate or total mixed ration feeding, and duration of finishing in beef steers. Livestock Science 103, 169–180.Google Scholar
Kempster, AJ, Cook, GL and Smith, RJ (1980) The evaluation of a standardized cutting technique for determining breed differences in carcass composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 431–440.Google Scholar
Kempster, AJ, Cuthbertson, A and Harrington, G (1982) Beef carcass grading and classification. In Kempster, AJ, Cuthbertson, A and Harrington, G (eds), Carcase Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing. London, UK: Granada, pp. 163–201.Google Scholar
Kennedy, PC, Dawson, LER, Lively, FO, Steen, RWJ, Fearon, AM, Moss, BW and Kilpatrick, DJ (2018) Effects of offering lupins/triticale and vetch/barley silages alone or in combination with grass silage on animal performance, meat quality and the fatty acid composition of lean meat from beef cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 156, in press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859618000837Google Scholar
Lively, FO, Keady, TWJ, Moss, BW, Patterson, DC and Gordon, AW (2005) The effect of genotype and pelvic hanging technique on meat quality. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 2005, p. 59.Google Scholar
O'Kiely, P and Moloney, AP (1995) Performance of beef cattle offered whole-crop barley and wheat silage. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 34, 13–24.Google Scholar
O'Kiely, P and Moloney, AP (2002) Nutritive value of whole crop wheat and grass silage for beef cattle when offered alone or in mixtures. Proceedings of the Agricultural Research Forum 2002, 99–100.Google Scholar
Opitz, V, Boberfeld, W, Sterzenbach, M and Daniel, P (2004) Silage quality of tall fescue in comparison with other grass species. In Lüscher, A, Jeangros, B, Kessler, W, Huguenin, O, Lobsiger, M, Millar, N and Suter, D (eds), Land Use Systems in Grassland Dominated Regions. Proceedings of the 20th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation. Grassland Science in Europe vol. 9. Zurich, Switzerland: AGFF, pp. 972–974.Google Scholar
Payne, RW, Murray, DA, Harding, SA, Baird, DB and Souter, DM (2009) Genstat for Windows (12th Edition) Introduction. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International.Google Scholar
Scollan, ND, Choi, NJ, Kurt, E, Fisher, AV, Enser, M and Wood, JD (2001) Manipulating the fatty acid composition of muscle and adipose tissue in beef cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 85, 115–124.Google Scholar
Scollan, ND, Hocquette, J, Nuernberg, K, Dannenberger, D, Richardson, I and Moloney, A (2006) Innovations in beef production systems that enhance the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Science 74, 17–33.Google Scholar
Steen, RWJ and McIlmoyle, WA (1982) An evaluation of red-clover silage for beef production. Animal Production 34, 95–101.Google Scholar
Steen, RWJ and Porter, MG (2003) The effects of high-concentrate diets and pasture on the concentration of conjugated linoleic acid in beef muscle and subcutaneous fat. Grass and Forage Science 58, 50–57.Google Scholar
Steen, RWJ, Gordon, FJ, Dawson, LER, Park, RS, Mayne, CS, Agnew, RE, Kilpatrick, DJ and Porter, MG (1998) Factors affecting the intake of grass silage by cattle and prediction of silage intake. Animal Science 66, 115–127.Google Scholar
Steen, RWJ, Kilpatrick, DJ and Porter, MG (2002) Effects of the proportions of high or medium digestibility grass silage and concentrates in the diet of beef cattle on liveweight gain, carcass composition and fatty acid composition of muscle. Grass and Forage Science 57, 279–291.Google Scholar
Steen, RWJ, Lavery, NP, Kilpatrick, DJ and Porter, MG (2003) Effects of pasture and high-concentrate diets on the performance of beef cattle, carcass composition at equal growth rates, and the fatty acid composition of beef. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 69–81.Google Scholar
Walsh, K, O'Kiely, PO, Moloney, AP and Boland, TM (2008a) Intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and performance of beef cattle fed diets based on whole-crop wheat or barley harvested at two cutting heights relative to maize silage or ad libitum concentrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology 144, 257–278.Google Scholar
Walsh, K, O'Kiely, PO, Moloney, AP and Boland, TM (2008b) Intake, performance and carcass characteristics of beef cattle offered diets based on whole-crop wheat or forage maize relative to grass silage or ad libitum concentrates. Livestock Science 116, 223–236.Google Scholar