Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T18:34:19.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer: V. Nutrition in late pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. H. Broster ,
Valerie J. Tuck  and
C. C. Balch
W. H. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Valerie J. Tuck
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
C. C. Balch
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A randomized block experiment has been carried out with 42 Friesian heifers over a 2-year period to examine the protein and energy requirements in late pregnancy. Rations were based on good quality hay fed to appetite plus various quantities and combinations of oats and decorticated groundnut meal. Minerals were given daily.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , August 1964 , pp. 51 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, G. L. & Broster, W. H. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 435.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Campling, R. C. (1962). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 32, 669.Google Scholar
Balch, Bartlett S. & Johnson, C. C., , V. W. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, S. & Broster, W. H. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 60.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1957). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 16, 52.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Mitchell, H. H. (1948). J. Anim. Sci. 7, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H. (1963). N.A.A.S. Quart. Rev. no. 62, 76.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Tuok, V. J. & Baloh, C. C. (1963). J. Agric. Sci. 60, 393.Google Scholar
Federer, W. T. (1955). Experimental Design. New York: Maomillan Co.Google Scholar
Gatnes, W. L. (1928). Bull. III. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 308, p. 403.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, P. E. (1961). Beretg, fra Forsogslab., Copenhagen, No. 299.Google Scholar
Lofgreen, G. P., Loosli, J. K. & Maynard, L. A. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 171.Google Scholar
Mubdoch, J. C. (1962). J. Brit. Orassl. Soc. 17, 133.Google Scholar
Ridier, B., Bkoster, W. H. & Foot, A. S. (1963). J. Agric. Sci. 61, 1.Google Scholar
Swanson, E. W. & Herman, H. A. (1943). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 372.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1957). Bull. Min. Agric. Lond. no. 48.Google Scholar