Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T14:44:51.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of soil type, crop management and weather on the recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to winter wheat in spring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. S. Powlson
Affiliation:
Soils and Crop Sciences Division, AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
P. B. S. Hart
Affiliation:
Soils and Crop Sciences Division, AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
P. R. Poulton
Affiliation:
Soils and Crop Sciences Division, AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
A. E. Johnston
Affiliation:
Soils and Crop Sciences Division, AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
D. S. Jenkinson
Affiliation:
Soils and Crop Sciences Division, AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK

Summary

15N-labelled fertilizer was applied, in spring, to winter wheat crops in nine experiments in eastern England over a period of 4 years. Five were on Batcombe Series silty clay loam, two on Beccles Series sandy clay loam (with a mole-drained clay subsoil) and two on Cottenham Series sandy loam. In three of the experiments, different rates of fertilizer N were applied (up to 234 kg N/ha); in the others, a single rate (between 140 and 230 kg/ha) was used.

Recovery of fertilizer N in the above-ground crop (grain, chaff, straw and stubble) ranged from 46 to 87% (mean 68%). The quantity of fertilizer N retained in the soil at harvest was remarkably constant between different experiments, averaging 18% where labelled N was applied as 15NH415NO3, but less (7–14%) where K16NO3 was applied. Of the labelled N present in soil to a depth of 70 cm, 84–88% was within the cultivated layer (0–23 cm).

L70 = 5(± 1 63) + 0·264(±00352) R3

accounted for 73% of the variation in the data where: L70 = percentage loss of fertilizer N from the crop: soil system, defined as percentage of labelled N not recovered in crop or in soil to a depth of 70 cm at the time of harvest; R3 = rainfall (in mm) in the 3 weeks following application of N fertilizer.

There was a tendency for percentage loss of fertilizer N to be greater when a quantity of N in excess of that required for maximum grain yield was applied. However, a multiple regression relating loss both to rainfall and to quantity of N applied accounted for no more variance than the regression involving rainfall alone. In one experiment, early and late sowing were compared on the first wheat crop that followed oats. The loss of N from the early-sown crop, given fertilizer N late in spring, was only 4% compared with 26 % from the later-sown crop given N at the same time, so that sowing date had a marked effect on the loss of spring-applied fertilizer N.

Uptake of unlabelled N, derived from mineralization of organic N in soil, autumn-applied N (where given) and from atmospheric inputs, was < 30 kg/ha on a low organic matter (0·08% total N) sandy soil but > 130 kg/ha when wheat followed potatoes or beans on soil containing c. 0·15 % total N. Unlabelled N accounted for 20–50% of the total N content of fertilized crops at harvest. About 50% of this unlabelled N had already been taken up by the time of fertilizer application in spring and the final quantity was closely correlated with the amount present in the crop at this time. Applications of labelled fertilizer N tended to increase uptake of unlabelled N by 10–20 kg/ha, compared to controls receiving no N fertilizer. This was probably due to pool substitution, i.e. labelled inorganic N standing proxy for unlabelled inorganic N that would otherwise have been immobilized or denitrified.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addiscott, T. M. & Powlson, D. S. (1989). Laying the ground rules for nitrate. New Scientist 1662, 2829.Google Scholar
Addiscott, T. M. & Powlson, D. S. (1992). Partitioning losses of nitrogen fertilizer between leaching and denitrification. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 118, 101107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, B. W. & Bullock, P. (1969). The soils of Broadbalk. Morphology and classification of Broadbalk soils. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1968, Part 2, pp. 6381.Google Scholar
Barraclough, P. B. & Leigh, R. A. (1984). The growth and activity of winter wheat roots in the field: the effect of sowing date and soil type on root growth of high-yielding crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 5974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catt, J. A., Weir, A. H., Norrish, R. E., Rayner, J. H., King, D. W., Hall, D. G. M. & Murphy, C. P. (1980). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. III. Stackyard. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1979, Part 2, pp. 539.Google Scholar
Chabrol, M., Powlson, D. S. & Hornby, D. (1988). Uptake by maize (Zea mays L.) of nitrogen from 15N-labelled dazomet, 15N-labelled fertilizer and from the soil microbial biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 20, 517523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colbourn, P. (1988). The influence of drainage and cultivation on denitrification losses from an arable clay soil. In Nitrogen Efficiency in Agricultural Soils (Eds Jenkinson, D. S. & Smith, K. A.), pp. 283294. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment Central Directorate of Environmental Protection (1986). Nitrate in Water. A Report by the Nitrate Coordination Group. Pollution Paper No. 26. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Destain, J. P., Guiot, J., Franķcois, E. & Riga, A. (1989). Fertilizer nitrogen budgets of two doses of Na15NO3 dressings split-applied to winter wheat in microplots on a loam soil. Plant and Soil 117, 177183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilz, K. (1988). Efficiency of uptake and utilization of fertilizer nitrogen by plants. In Nitrogen Efficiency in Agricultural Soils (Eds Jenkinson, D. S. & Smith, K. A.), pp. 126. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dowdell, R. J. & Webster, C. P. (1984). A lysimeter study of the fate of fertilizer nitrogen in spring barley crops grown on a shallow soil overlying chalk: denitrification losses and nitrogen balance. Journal of Soil Science 35, 183190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendining, M. J., Powlson, D. S. & Poulton, P. R. (1990). Some agricultural and environmental consequencesm of long-term applications of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer. In Fertilization and the Environment (Eds Merckx, R., Vereecken, H. & Vlassak, K.), pp. 189196. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Goss, M. J., Colbourn, P., Harris, G. L. & Howse, K. R. (1988). Leaching of nitrogen under autumn-sown crops and the effects of tillage. In Nitrogen Efficiency in Agricultural Soils (Eds Jenkinson, D. S. & Smith, K. A.), pp. 269282. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Goulding, K. W. T. & Johnston, A. E. (1989). Long-term atmospheric deposition and soil acidification at Rothamsted Experimental Station, England. In Acid Deposition – Sources, Effects and Controls (Ed. Longhurst, J. W. S.), pp. 213228. Letchworth, UK: British Library Technical Communications.Google Scholar
Harper, L. A., Sharpe, R. R., Langdale, G. W. & Giddens, J. E. (1987). Nitrogen cycling in a wheat crop: soil, plant and aerial nitrogen transport. Agronomy Journal 79, 965972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, P. B. S., Rayner, J. H. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1986). Influence of pool substitution on the interpretation of fertilizer experiments with 15N. Journal of Soil Science 37, 389403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, C. A. H. (1972). The soils of Saxmundham Experimental Station. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1971, Part 2, pp. 143148.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S. & Parry, L. C. (1989). The nitrogen cycle in the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment: a model for the turnover of nitrogen through the soil microbial biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 21, 535541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S., Fox, R. A. & Rayner, J. H. (1985). Interaction between fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen – the so-called ‘priming effect’. Journal of Soil Science 36, 425444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, A. E. (1975). Experiments made on Stackyard Field, Woburn, 1876–1974. I. History of the field, details of the cropping and manuring and the yields in continuous wheat and barley experiments. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1974, Part 2, pp. 2944.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. E. (1987). Saxmundham Experimental Station 1899–1986. A review of the achievements during 1965–1986. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1986, Part 2, pp. 265279.Google Scholar
Klemedtsson, L., Svensson, B. H. & Rosswall, T. (1988). Relationships between soil moisture content and nitrous oxide production during nitrification and denitrification. Biology and Fertility of Soils 6, 106111.Google Scholar
Macdonald, A. J., Powlson, D. S., Poulton, P. R. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1989). Unused fertilizer nitrogen in arable soils – its contribution to nitrate leaching. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 46, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mary, B., Recous, S. & Machet, J.-M. (1988). A comprehensive approach to the fertilization part of plant nitrogen uptake. In Nitrogen Efficiency in Agricultural Soils (Eds Jenkinson, D. S. & Smith, K. A.), pp. 8594. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mosier, A. R., Guenzi, W. D. & Schweizer, E. E. (1986). Soil losses of dinitrogen and nitrous oxide from irrigated crops in northeastern Colorado. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50, 344348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, W. J., Morgan, J. A., Altenhofen, J. M. & Harper, L. A. (1988). Ammonia volatilization from spring wheat plants. Agronomy Journal 50, 419425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powlson, D. S., Pruden, G., Johnston, A. E. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1986a). The nitrogen cycle in the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment: recovery and losses of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied in spring and inputs of nitrogen from the atmosphere. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 591609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powlson, D. S., Hart, P. B. S., Pruden, G. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1986b). Recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied in autumn to winter wheat at four sites in eastern England. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 611620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powlson, D. S., Poulton, P. R., Rodgers, G. A. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1986C). Recovery of early dressings of fertilizer N by oilseed rape. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1985, Part 1, p. 166.Google Scholar
Prew, R. D., Church, B. M., Dewar, A. M., Lacey, J., Magan, N., Penny, A., Plumb, R. T., Thorne, G. N., Todd, A. D. & Williams, T. D. (1985). Some factors limiting the growth and yield of winter wheat and their variation in two seasons. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104, 135162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prew, R. D., Beane, J., Carter, N., Church, B. M., Dewar, A. M., Lacey, J., Penny, A., Plumb, R. T., Thorne, G. N. & Todd, A. D. (1986). Some factors affecting the growth and yield of winter wheat grown as a third cereal with much or negligible take-all. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 639671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruden, G., Powlson, D. S. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1985a). The measurement of 15N in soil and plant material. Fertilizer Research 6, 205218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruden, G., Kalembasa, S. J. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1985b). Reduction of nitrate prior to Kjeldahl digestion. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36, 7173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riga, A., Francois, E., Destain, J. P., Guiot, J. & Oger, R. (1988). Fertilizer nitrogen budget of Na15NO3 and (15NH4)2SO4 split-applied to winter wheat in microplots on a loam soil. Plant and Soil 106, 201208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, G. P. & Tiedje, J. M. (1987). Nitrous oxide sources in aerobic soils: nitrification, denitrification and other biological processes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19, 187193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Society (1983). The Nitrogen Cycle in the United Kingdom. A Study Group Report. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
Sextone, A. J., Parkin, T. B. & Tiedje, J. M. (1985). Temporal response of soil denitrification rates to rainfall and irrigation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49, 99103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R., Addiscott, T. M., Vaidyanathan, L. V., Murray, A. W. A. & Whitmore, A. P. (1987). Nitrogen advice for cereals: present realities and future possibilities. Proceedings of the Fertilizer Society 263, 136.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N., Welbank, P. J., Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A., Todd, A. D. & Weir, A. H. (1988). Contrast between sandy and clay soils in the effects of various factors on the growth, nitrogen uptake and yield of winter wheat in three years. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 110, 119140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warneck, P. (1988). Chemistry of the Natural Atmosphere. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Webster, C. P. & Goulding, K. W. T. (1989). Influence of soil carbon content on denitrificalion from fallow land during autumn. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 49, 131142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, A. P. & Parry, L. C. (1988). Computer simulation of the behaviour of nitrogen in soil and crops in the Broadbalk Continuous Wheat Experiment. In Nitrogen Efficiency in Agricultural Soils (Eds Jenkinson, D. S. & Smith, K. A.), pp. 418432. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A., Darby, R. J., Bird, E. & Hewitt, M. V. (1987). Amounts of NO3-N and NH4-N in soil, from autumn to spring, under winter wheat and their relationship to soil type, sowing date, previous crop and N uptake at Rothamsted, Woburn and Saxmundham, 1979–85. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 7395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, T. M., Pruden, G., Powlson, D. S. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1982). Apparatus for applying 15N-labelled fertilizer uniformly to field micro-plots. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 27, 369372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar